One June 19th, 1787, Sophie Hélène Béatrice, the fourth child born to Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI, died at just under one year old. Her loss is reflected in this portrait by Vigee-Lebrun, which includes an empty cradle where Sophie would have been painted.
Marie Antoinette wrote to her sister in law Elisabeth, asking her to visit the Trianon after her daughter's death, "... we are mourning the death of my poor little angel. Farewell dear heart, you know how much I love you and I need your whole heart to comfort mine."
Elisabeth wrote to her friend, "I have been to [Trianon] the last few days with [the queen] and there was no attention she did not show me. ... what we did most was to weep over the death of my poor little niece."
Again writing to Bombelles, Elisabeth wrote how she hoped that Sophie would pray well for her (intercession) and "If you only knew how pretty she was when she died! It’s incredible. The day before, she was white and the color of pink, not thin; finally charming."
And no, none of the lovely detailed pastel or sketch drawings said to be young Sophie are actually Sophie. More information on these depictions here: invitinghistory.com/2021/07/the-mi…
The only absolutely-positively-confirmed depiction of Sophie we have is this crop from an image depicting the royal family:
There is also this allegorical portrait attributed to Gautier-Dagoty, and the assumption is that the blurry profile on the left is perhaps meant to be Sophie. But Dagoty died in 1786 before Sophie's death and the artist & subject of the painting is unconfirmed.
The autopsy of young Sophie concluded that she had died from a bacterial infection, possibly but not necessarily related to tuberculosis." She had a simple funeral.
On June 15th of 1787, Louis XVI had written in his notes, 'My youngest daughter's illness prevents me from hunting." On the 19th, he wrote, "Death of my youngest daughter at 3 o'clock. Walk in Saint-Cyr."
Related note: Fersen mythologers who pounce on Louis XVI writing 'Birth of the duc of Normandie, same as that of my son' as evidence Louis Charles wasn't his still pretend that Sophie must have also been Fersen's, even though Louis XVI wrote repeatedly of her, "MY daughter."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The takes about Titanic being a ship "for the wealthy" have been popping up because of the submarine, and idk how to tell people that the vast majority of Titanic's passengers were third-class passengers traveling to/from America. It was a passenger liner, not a luxury yacht.
Third-class passengers had the highest capacity (around 1,100 top capacity for 3rd class--she wasn't full for her maiden voyage) as these types of passenger liners saw their bread and butter with the "average" person and families making these crossings to/from America.
Third class passengers also had the lowest passenger survival rate during the disaster. While there is no evidence for the full-size gates featured in Titanic films, and no evidence for any concentrated effort to keep third class passengers as a whole away from the boats--
"... the notion that [the 1999 revival of interest in Joseph Bologne] brought Saint-Georges back from two centuries of total oblivion, seems but a self-serving scenario meant to enhance the importance of his re-discoverers." Gabriel Banat in his 2006 biography.
Banat has a fairly lengthy passage towards the end of his biography where he contradicts the commonly accepted notion that Bologne had been entirely forgotten until recently (recent to his 2006 biography, that is) and this particular quote jumped out as relevant.
Little used in popular media like film and non-docudrama/documentary television? Yes, yes, and yes. But he appears in novels, biographies, recordings/performances, theater, opera, even an elaborate equestrian spectacle at Versailles.
All right, time to take a look at "Helpful Heart," the storybook that comes with the Civil War Nurse Barbie doll. Can you guess if this book is going to try to be "neutral" so as not to be unappealing to the "Lost Cause" demographic?
"Some thought it was about who owned the land, but others believed it was about freeing the slaves." Because you can't have a storybook for a Civil War Nurse doll include the primary reason why these states seceded: battlefields.org/learn/articles…
We get Barbie in her full glorious 90s hair, opining that gee whiz, we should all just help one another instead of fighting! I also love the vague blame the book gives to Lincoln here.
Moreau's work was not entirely in vain! I was curious to see what books were part of the 160 (or so) books he selected for Marie Antoinette's library as dauphine, and after looking one up, it also appears in her library at the Tuileries--this was the more "stately" library.
The book in question: "Histoire des Empereurs Romains" by M. Crevier, published in 1763 in 12 volumes. All 12 volumes can be accessed here: lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01:…
I wonder how many of the works Moreau collected did end up being in her library. And I wonder how many of these went unread. MA preferred novels and plays, though she did take a whack at David Hume's "History of England," which was Louis XVI's favorite book.