The Home Office has finally confirmed it will collate and publish data on the use of police powers to restrict protests, following sustained pressure from Netpol and our supporters netpol.org/2023/06/20/pre…#DefendDissent
@JustStop_Oil@libertyhq This delay is three years after greater transparency was recommended by Parliament’s @HumanRightsCtte, and comes despite almost all usage of powers to restrict protests resulting from just one force – the Metropolitan Police.
@JustStop_Oil@libertyhq@HumanRightsCtte Frustratingly, the Home Office will require everyone to wait an entire year, until “the summer of 2024”, before protest data becomes publicly available – despite a significant portion of the data already made publicly available via the Metropolitan Police’s social media.
Based on data reported on a Met Twitter feed, Netpol has already identified over 125 instances of the police issuing Section 12 notices on @JustStop_Oil protesters since 1 May 2023. This number is rising daily. You can find the raw data here cryptpad.fr/sheet/#/3/shee…
In most cases we tracked, it took the Metropolitan Police less than 5 minutes to issue a Section 12 notice after arriving on the scene. Here's a visualization of this
The Met's figures for the use of section 12 powers to restrict protests are practically identical to Netpol's. So why does the Home Office need an entire year to gather and publish data when the consequences of these powers are happening right now? news.met.police.uk/news/update-86…
With so few forces outside of London ever using Section 12 and 14 powers, there is little justification for needing an entire year to gather data on restrictions that have a profound impact on the right to freedom of assembly.
The delay suggests the Home Office has had to hurriedly come up with a plan after facing unanticipated outside scrutiny. Our thanks to @CarolineLucas and others for helping us to force this into the public domain
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It has been 'subversive', 'agitator', then 'extremist'. Now the police are labelling campaigners demanding genuine alternatives to the mess Britain is in right now as "aggravated activists". On 15 February 2023, we are reclaiming that label as our own on #AggravatedActivism Day
Amidst a growing intolerance towards the right to protest, Netpol has been keen to remind everyone that protest is not illegal – not yet – but it has become a lot more uncertain. Together, we need to create the conditions to challenge the spread of uncertainty.
That’s why we have called on campaigners to avoid seeing themselves in isolation from others and to understand that the threat of oppressive policing falls on all of us – so we better start offering solidarity to each other.
🧵 COMMENT: police ‘not knowing’ whether protest is permitted is deliberate – and it has to end (1/10) netpol.org/2022/09/15/com…
The police response to anti-monarchy protests has been familiar: faced with demonstrators whose legitimacy officers reject, even the most innocuous demonstrations (like holding up a card or a few shouted words) have been quickly closed down (2/10)
These incidents have highlighted, once again, how public order policing relies heavily on creating uncertainty, with the intention that this stops people from exercising their rights to protest in any way because of a fear of arrest (3/10)
An unofficial strike by Metropolitan Police firearms officers forced the reinstatement in 2004 of their colleagues who gunned down an innocent man, Harry Stanley news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/l…
🧵 A short thread on the proposed new public order bill that the government will include in the Queen's Speech next Monday:
These new police powers were floated before by Boris Johnson in October 2021 as a knee-jerk reaction to what he called “illegitimate protests” involving civil disobedience against government inaction on the climate crisis
Rejecting the legitimacy of climate campaigners’ demands, whilst seeking an expansion of blanket stop and search powers, will lead to the relentless harassment of protesters by the police, simply for travelling to a protest whilst having an association with an “illegal” movement
🧵 With the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act about to become law, what's important now is not to panic or despair but to get ready to resist - a short thread on the new law's protest provisions
1. Many of the Act's new protest powers are poorly defined with the Home Secretary deciding the meaning of terms like “serious disruption”. In practice, the police will choose when and how to impose restrictions on protests, opening the door for widespread abuse. That means...
2. KNOWING YOUR RIGHTS: new police powers aim to further criminalise campaigners who use direct action or civil disobedience tactics, often something as simple as blocking a road, so we all need to know what new changes to the law mean. We will have new legal resources ready soon
Our 2015 campaign "Together Against Prevent" gets a mention in this Policy Exchange report. Not sure how we're part of a "raucous Islamist opposition" though: our campaign specifically argued that collectively campaigners must not leave Muslim communities to resist Prevent alone
Policy Exchange points the finger at Muslim opponents of Prevent and throws around accusations that "delegitimising counter terrorism risks enabling terrorism" because this means avoiding widespread condemnation of Prevent from a wide spectrum of human rights organisations
You can find out about our 'Together Against Prevent' campaign here - and decide for yourself if it's terrifying or entirely reasonable togetheragainstprevent.org