WATCH: During the Opening Keynote of the American Library Association's recent Library 2.0 conference Associate Professor in the School of Information Science at the University of Kentucky Dr. Shannon M. Oltmann, Ph.D. & Associate Professor in the School of Information Sciences… https://t.co/ykTl3Y2LMUtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Deborah Caldwell-Stone, Director, American Library Association Office for Intellectual Freedom, American Library Association Office for Intellectual Freedom discusses how to keep LGBTQ+ books on shelves & behind the circulation desks.
Deborah Caldwell-Stone also discussed Kirk Cameron's Brave Books Story Hour, which she refers to as his "Library Takeover Campaign" wanting to rent meeting rooms & how you can adjust certain policies already in place to limit accessibility or make it more difficult for… https://t.co/wp2NK29pKYtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Deborah Caldwell-Stone begrudgingly explains how libraries have to adhere to 1A policies across the board, but gives examples of how to combat certain groups from scheduling meeting rooms.
She says library staff can schedule a library-sponsored Pride event on the same day and… https://t.co/5pokSMHFbKtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Valerie Byrd Fort, Instructor, University of South Carolina discusses how librarians should be sure to NOT label LGBTQ+ books as such to thwart certain groups from obtaining them. In this group she specifically names parents.
April Dawkins, Assistant Professor, UNC Greensboro goes over a website where you can find legislation on certain topics, including a downloadable guide on how to support & hold Drag Story Hour in libraries.
One particular frame from the Louisiana Association of School Librarians (LASL) caught my eye, it reads:
"The bottom line - moving books written for teens and housed in the teen section on topics of sex education and sexual identity to the adult section of a library is… https://t.co/x6tJNWsSG4twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Another session of the conference was held by Andrew Wertheimer & titled "The Politics of Nativist Censorship Efforts: Today's Right Wing 'Culture War' and Lessons from Previous Historical Movements" which discussed "defending obscenities".
Star Bradley, Research and Instruction Librarian, Montana State University Library wanted to make 250 banned books free to distribute to the public, reached out to Friends of the Library who helped fund her event. They asked for $1,500 & received it.
They couldn't afford to get copies of all banned books, so they decided on these 5. These have been banned for sexual content, language, and invoking violence, particularly seen in "The Hate You Give".
The ALA's own website for top banned books in 2022 list why they were banned.… https://t.co/XX6bYJ0I5ltwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Peter Bromberg referred to Arnold King's "The Three Languages of Politics" in how to respond to those who are challenging books in "their language:" in his hosted session on messaging called "Real world policy and messaging issues from the trenches."
These included keywords depending on who was challenging the books:
https://t.co/HvSnkp7Uoq
"Virginia: a Case Study of Race and Sexuality as Recurring Factors in the History of Book Banning" is the last in the sessions before the Closing Keynote, presented by Keith Weimer, Librarian for History and Religious Studies, University of Virginia Library.
In the Closing Keynote: Social Justice and Intellectual Freedom: Why We Need Both by Dr. Martin Garnar, Director of the Amherst College Library he discusses the importance of DEI in libraries.
“DEI” are the core ways we pull this all together:
A for access
J for justice
B for… https://t.co/59ONSrKskjtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Dr. Martin Garnar also discusses issues surrounding Drag Queen Story Hour, restrictions in their policies, and meeting room language.
"Controversial is defined differently by different people."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Elon tells us exactly why we're being suppressed on 𝕏:
🧵+📽️
1/11
"There's a big difference between freedom of speech and freedom of reach.
"Whatever you say, however controversial then does not need to be broadcast to the whole country."
2/11
"Whatever you say, however controversial then does not need to be broadcast to the whole country."
3/11
"So I think generally the approach to Twitter is to let people say what they want to do within the bounds of the law, but then limit who sees that based on any given Twitter user's preferences."
SHOCKING: COVID-19 Vaccines Linked to Disturbing Autopsy Results - Stunning Lancet Study Removed Within 24 Hours
74% of participants died from taking at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.
A 🧵:
A recent Lancet study titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination” was removed from the SSRN website less than 24 hours after publication.
The purpose of the 48-page study was to examine all COVID-19-related deaths and to report on the doctors’ findings. The key takeaway from this study? 74% of participants died from taking at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.
It appears that since the X Corp. is based out of Nevada and San Francisco, California, it is considered a citizen in both states. The parent corporation is X Holdings Corp.
There were 3 that came up as options under this listing. I've been on the phone with them for 20 min.
They're reporting it with "quality management".
She said to give them 24-72 hours to remove the tag.
Adults, fine- kids listings, full stop.
How difficult would it be to implement a flag that Amazon would need to review when the listing includes the words "penis" or "vulva" in the same sentence as "kids"?
I lost a friend yesterday of over 25+years. We had met in high school & remained friends. This person is a lefty, but we never let that get in the way of our friendship. We were always able to discuss our opposing views respectfully, & walk away, leaving it all on the table.
Yesterday was different. After expressing my joy for the Rittenhouse verdict they took it upon themselves to chime in on some of my social media posts, which was not abnormal for them. I never deleted any of their opinions & always approached any response with the goal of being
able to understand their position, explain my own & still come to the conclusion that regardless of our political views on any given topic, the love we had for one another always trumped any disagreement we may have. After a heated discussion re: Kyle & those who he shot..