Thread - The Carthaginian Army - Part II : Mercenaries and Cavalry
Given the extensive representation of populations from the west. Med. in the Carthaginian army, it is not feasible to provide a comprehensive description of all of them. Therefore, I will focus on the key mercenary troops that frequently fought alongside the Carthaginians.
1) The Iberians : In Thucydides' account (6.90.3), the Athenian general Alcibiades, praises Iberian mercenaries as some of the finest fighters available in the western Mediterranean.
2 types of infantry among them : the caetrati, who constituted the light infantry armed with javelins (iron tip) and a small round shield with a metal boss, and the scutarii, which constituted the heavy infantry and who carried a flat oval shield similar to the roman scutum.
The Scutarii could also carry javelins, and wielded the highly renowned falcata sword. The caetrati, on the other hand, were equipped with javelins, light shields (caetra), and falcata swords. The latter did not wear any armor.
Iberian warriors employed two types of swords: curved and straight. The first type, known as a falcata, was a variation of the Greek kopis. But Unlike the latter, it had a sharpened back edge near the tip, allowing for thrusting attacks.
The second known as the "gladius hispanicus" by roman sources was a relatively short blade featured sharp edges on both sides and a long, tapered point suitable for stabbing. Encased in a framed scabbard, it was suspended from a waist belt using a stable ring suspension system.
The Celtiberian forces were similarly equipped to the Iberians but fought with a mailed armor, a long, double-edged sword and a javelin made entirely of iron called the soliferreum. Additionally, they utilized incendiary weapons such as the falarica.
The famous Balearic slingers, known as the best slingers of ancient times, were first employed by Carthage around 337 BC. Since Carthage recognized the importance of long-range skirmishing, they considered them a valuable component of their armies.
According to Strabo, the slings used by these warriors were crafted from hair or sinew, with each individual carrying three slings of varying thong lengths to accommodate different ranges. When not in use, the slings would be fastened around their heads.
The ammunition consisted of stone, not lead like their Rhodian counterparts. They were carried in a bag slung over the shoulder. Diodorus reports a peculiar characteristic of these warriors, as they did not use currency and instead requested payment in the form of wine and women.
2) The Celts : The Celtic warriors in the Carthaginian armies generally fought with a long double-edged sword made especially for slashing, javelins, short spears, large oval shields (leather-covered wood) and often wore little to no armor, which was seen as a sign of bravery.
Shields were decorated and reinforced with embossed figures of animals in rolled bronze ; bronze helmets with high crests, horns, or figures of birds
and animals on the top; iron ringmail armour were often worn by the nobles.
Celts lacked a specific formation in battle and were often characterized as undisciplined. Their approach simply involved straight charges against the enemy, engaging in combat on a personal level. It is worth noting that their long slashing swords required ample space.
Celtic warriors also used psychological techniques aimed to create a sense of terror such as matted hair, numerous horns/trumpets to produce an intimidating sound. They also achieved it by striking their swords against shields, accompanied by singing and wild screaming.
3) The Oscans : Famous warriors comprising various peoples from southern Italy who frequently allied themselves against Rome alongside Carthage. They apparently had a reputation of being unscrupulous changing sides quite often.
During the 4th and 3rd centuries, Campanian soldiers were equipped with either a thyreos-type shield featuring a central rib or a typical greek Aspis, a linothorax or muscle cuirass, and an Attic-style helmet adorned with a crest and feather on each side (geminae pinnae).
Additionally they could wear a characteristic Oscan triple-disc cuirass with a broad Oscan belt and Graeco-Etruscan greaves with a Montefortino-type helmet. Main weapons consisted of javelins (iron tips) and short spears, while their swords were typically of the Greek kopis type.
Here is a Campanian triple-disc cuirass discovered in a tomb at Ksour Essef in Tunisia. Dating back to the 3rd century BC, it is most likely a trophy brought back by a libyan veteran who fought in Hannibal's army.
Greek mercenary infantry units gained prominence between 340 - 240 BC, after the defeat at Krimisos that highlighted the effectiveness of Greek hoplites. During the first Punic War, Carthage recruited Greek generals, notably Xanthippos from Sparta, to lead their troops.
So as we've seen these mercenary regiments fought with their own equipment and tactics, led by their own officers who were under Carthaginian command. Interestingly, some of these foreign officers, like the Gallic chief Autaritus during the Mercenary War, could speak Punic.
The Cavalry : The Carthaginian cavalry comprised Libyo-Phoenician forces as heavy cavalry, alongside notable Numidian auxiliaries serving as light cavalry, who demonstrated remarkable effectiveness during the Second Punic War in Italy.
From the 4th century BC, they constituted the majority of Carthaginian cavalry forces. Unarmored and wielding a small shield resembling the Iberian caetra, they relied on a handful of javelins tipped with iron and skillfully used a dagger to cut the leg tendons of their enemies.
Additionally, there were contingents of Mauretanian, Gaetulian, and Iberian cavalry, forming the light cavalry segment, while the heavy cavalry consisted of young Carthaginian aristocrats, the libyo-phoenician and celtic cavalrymen.
The Libyo-Phoenician cavalry distinguished themselves from the Numidian cavalry through their utilization of saddles, long-sleeved tunics, Hellenistic-style muscle cuirasses, and large shields with an umbo. Reconstitution (right) of Ian heath based on a terracotta statuette :
END - part III will be about the War elephants and chariots, siege engines en standards.
Artists : Ian heath, Steve Noon, Clive Spong, Richard Hook, Manuel Krommenacker, Johnny Shumate, Jenny Dolfen, Peter Connolly, Kaya Gokberk
@SuffeteIfriqi Thanks bro I really appreciate 👍
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Starting in the second half of the 6th century BC, Carthage undertook a vast colonization program involving the sending of North African settlers to SE Spain as well as to Ibiza and Sardinia. These population transfers did not necessarily imply military conquest or the annexation of large territories, but rather the dispatch of colonists to pre-existing sites or new foundations in order to develop colonial enterprises in these regions. The massive settlement of these colonists led to a redefinition of relations between Phoenicians and Iberians, which eventually became conflictual. A cultural rupture is also evident, although it was not total and shows that indigenous populations were also integrated into the new foundations. These 6th century settlements are contemporaneous with the mention of a Libyan people living in Iberia, whom Greek sources call the "Elbestians". 🧵
The settlement of these North Africans is also perceptible through toponymy, which was altered and acquired a Libyco-Phoenician aspect (-uba/-oba is a Libyan element meaning "fortification" for example). The analysis of these toponymic data shows evident links with eastern Algeria and Tunisia, which indeed provided contingents of colonists and mercenaries to Carthage. This colonization policy experienced two further phases at the end of the 5th century and at the beginning of the 4th century. The foundation of Carteia must be placed within this context and according to Pomponius Mela, this city was inhabited by "Phoenicians from Africa", a term that is generally interpreted as referring to Libyphoenician or Punicized Libyan populations.
In Northern Morocco, the handmade pottery found in the earliest layers of Lixus suggests that its foundation involved not only Phoenicians but also Tartessians (it should be noted that other studies indicate that the site was already occupied at the end of the Bronze Age, making it likely that the Phoenicians settled in the surrounding area rather than replacing earlier inhabitants and hence why the Pseudo-Scylax mentions for Lixus a "city of the Libyans" and a "city of the Phoenicians"). These movements and settlements therefore appear to have involved Phoenicians, locals, and Tartessians. This ceramic assemblage also shows strong similarities with productions from eastern Andalusia. As in the case of Spain, the establishment of such a site could only have been achieved through agreements or purchases with local populations, and the archaeological record suggests the participation and interaction of Iberian and Berber groups. A comparable situation can be observed about 400km further south on the island of Mogador, where, somewhat surprisingly, the site may also have hosted Moabites and Hebrews. Furthermore, whether in Spain or North Africa, the Phoenician settlement of these regions, especially near river mouths, encouraged indigenous populations to establish settlements in close proximity. These local groups were gradually integrated into Phoenician colonial communities and appear to have provided agricultural labor and women, since Phoenician colonization was predominantly carried out by male settlers.
Short Thread - Unfortunately, very little is known about the layout and architecture of the ancient city of Cirta/Kirtan, the capital of the Numidian kingdom, largely due to continuous occupation since antiquity and urban developments that have destroyed much of its heritage. The following is a brief summary of the limited information available for the pre-Roman period.
The urban site is located on a vast limestone rock raised between faults. In addition, the site lies at the center of a region favorable for cereal cultivation and livestock farming. To the north and east, the city is surrounded by deep gorges carved by the Rhumel River (ancient Ampsaga). It is impregnable on three sides and accessible via an isthmus to the northwest. The site therefore presents natural defensive conditions that attracted humans from an early period.
On a side note: even though we don’t hear much about it, it was one of the most populous cities in the ancient world (3rd–2nd centuries BC), hosting around 200k people. Its ancient name "Cirta" is almost certainly not of Phoenician origin. Indeed, the Phoenician noun Qart/QRT, meaning “city,” begins with the letter qoph, whereas on Cirta’s coins with Neo-Punic inscriptions dated to the 2nd century BC, the city’s name is written KRTN (Kirthan) with a kaph, derived from the Libyco-Berber “Kart”, meaning “rock,” which makes perfect sense given its topographical position.
Thread - Summary of Everything We Currently Know About the Mausoleum of Beni Rhenane (Western Algeria, 2nd century BC)
The mausoleum stands on a 221m-high peak of Jbel Skouna, overlooking the river Tafna and the ruins of ancient Siga, capital of King Syphax (Masaesyle dynasty). It was built near a group of tumuli, just like the Medracen further confirming its dynastic nature.
Its plan resembles other mausolea, such as those at Sabratha (Mausoleum B) and Djerba (Henchir Bourgou), but it was far larger and more imposing: about 15m wide and likely at least 30m high, making it the largest tower tomb in North Africa.
Thread - Did Ancient Berbers Use Swords? If So, What Kind? Let’s Look at the Few Pieces of Evidence We Have.🧵
When it comes to describing the horsemen and infantry of North Africa, ancient authors almost never mention the use of the sword among them and instead emphasize the use of the javelin or even the cutlass. But what is the reality?
The earliest evidence of sword use among the ancient Berbers actually dates back to the Bronze Age. Indeed, during the 13th century BC, in the context of the Sea Peoples invasions, a stele dated to the reign of Merneptah mentions a victory over the chief of the Meshwesh...
Short Thread - The site of Kach Kouch in Northern Morocco: an Indigenous Rural Community of the Bronze and early Iron Age (2200–500 BC)🧵
The site is situated on Dhar Moudden Hill in the Wadi Lau valley, just 9 km from the sea. Naturally protected, it appears to have been a village with dwellings featuring walls made of wooden frameworks and branches, covered with wattle and daub.
Quadrangular structures are absent, except for one rectangular building with a stone base and earthen walls. The site mainly features round or elliptical huts with post holes, similar to oval-shaped huts found in Ceuta's earliest level (8th century BC).
Thread - Tables summarizing ethnographic facts about Ancient Canarians by E.A Hooton
- They practiced agriculture, fishing, hunting (lizards & birds), had livestock (sheep, pigs, goats) and had dogs
- Lived in caves (natural & artificial), dry-stone houses/huts
- Burials in caves or under tumuli
- Stone, Bone, Horn, Shell, Leather, Woodworking are all attested
- Ceramics with incised or painted decorations (only in Gran Canaria) including animal and human figurines, pellets for slings, beads and stamps