Thread - The Carthaginian Army - Part II : Mercenaries and Cavalry
Given the extensive representation of populations from the west. Med. in the Carthaginian army, it is not feasible to provide a comprehensive description of all of them. Therefore, I will focus on the key mercenary troops that frequently fought alongside the Carthaginians.
1) The Iberians : In Thucydides' account (6.90.3), the Athenian general Alcibiades, praises Iberian mercenaries as some of the finest fighters available in the western Mediterranean.
2 types of infantry among them : the caetrati, who constituted the light infantry armed with javelins (iron tip) and a small round shield with a metal boss, and the scutarii, which constituted the heavy infantry and who carried a flat oval shield similar to the roman scutum.
The Scutarii could also carry javelins, and wielded the highly renowned falcata sword. The caetrati, on the other hand, were equipped with javelins, light shields (caetra), and falcata swords. The latter did not wear any armor.
Iberian warriors employed two types of swords: curved and straight. The first type, known as a falcata, was a variation of the Greek kopis. But Unlike the latter, it had a sharpened back edge near the tip, allowing for thrusting attacks.
The second known as the "gladius hispanicus" by roman sources was a relatively short blade featured sharp edges on both sides and a long, tapered point suitable for stabbing. Encased in a framed scabbard, it was suspended from a waist belt using a stable ring suspension system.
The Celtiberian forces were similarly equipped to the Iberians but fought with a mailed armor, a long, double-edged sword and a javelin made entirely of iron called the soliferreum. Additionally, they utilized incendiary weapons such as the falarica.
The famous Balearic slingers, known as the best slingers of ancient times, were first employed by Carthage around 337 BC. Since Carthage recognized the importance of long-range skirmishing, they considered them a valuable component of their armies.
According to Strabo, the slings used by these warriors were crafted from hair or sinew, with each individual carrying three slings of varying thong lengths to accommodate different ranges. When not in use, the slings would be fastened around their heads.
The ammunition consisted of stone, not lead like their Rhodian counterparts. They were carried in a bag slung over the shoulder. Diodorus reports a peculiar characteristic of these warriors, as they did not use currency and instead requested payment in the form of wine and women.
2) The Celts : The Celtic warriors in the Carthaginian armies generally fought with a long double-edged sword made especially for slashing, javelins, short spears, large oval shields (leather-covered wood) and often wore little to no armor, which was seen as a sign of bravery.
Shields were decorated and reinforced with embossed figures of animals in rolled bronze ; bronze helmets with high crests, horns, or figures of birds
and animals on the top; iron ringmail armour were often worn by the nobles.
Celts lacked a specific formation in battle and were often characterized as undisciplined. Their approach simply involved straight charges against the enemy, engaging in combat on a personal level. It is worth noting that their long slashing swords required ample space.
Celtic warriors also used psychological techniques aimed to create a sense of terror such as matted hair, numerous horns/trumpets to produce an intimidating sound. They also achieved it by striking their swords against shields, accompanied by singing and wild screaming.
3) The Oscans : Famous warriors comprising various peoples from southern Italy who frequently allied themselves against Rome alongside Carthage. They apparently had a reputation of being unscrupulous changing sides quite often.
During the 4th and 3rd centuries, Campanian soldiers were equipped with either a thyreos-type shield featuring a central rib or a typical greek Aspis, a linothorax or muscle cuirass, and an Attic-style helmet adorned with a crest and feather on each side (geminae pinnae).
Additionally they could wear a characteristic Oscan triple-disc cuirass with a broad Oscan belt and Graeco-Etruscan greaves with a Montefortino-type helmet. Main weapons consisted of javelins (iron tips) and short spears, while their swords were typically of the Greek kopis type.
Here is a Campanian triple-disc cuirass discovered in a tomb at Ksour Essef in Tunisia. Dating back to the 3rd century BC, it is most likely a trophy brought back by a libyan veteran who fought in Hannibal's army.
Greek mercenary infantry units gained prominence between 340 - 240 BC, after the defeat at Krimisos that highlighted the effectiveness of Greek hoplites. During the first Punic War, Carthage recruited Greek generals, notably Xanthippos from Sparta, to lead their troops.
So as we've seen these mercenary regiments fought with their own equipment and tactics, led by their own officers who were under Carthaginian command. Interestingly, some of these foreign officers, like the Gallic chief Autaritus during the Mercenary War, could speak Punic.
The Cavalry : The Carthaginian cavalry comprised Libyo-Phoenician forces as heavy cavalry, alongside notable Numidian auxiliaries serving as light cavalry, who demonstrated remarkable effectiveness during the Second Punic War in Italy.
From the 4th century BC, they constituted the majority of Carthaginian cavalry forces. Unarmored and wielding a small shield resembling the Iberian caetra, they relied on a handful of javelins tipped with iron and skillfully used a dagger to cut the leg tendons of their enemies.
Additionally, there were contingents of Mauretanian, Gaetulian, and Iberian cavalry, forming the light cavalry segment, while the heavy cavalry consisted of young Carthaginian aristocrats, the libyo-phoenician and celtic cavalrymen.
The Libyo-Phoenician cavalry distinguished themselves from the Numidian cavalry through their utilization of saddles, long-sleeved tunics, Hellenistic-style muscle cuirasses, and large shields with an umbo. Reconstitution (right) of Ian heath based on a terracotta statuette :
END - part III will be about the War elephants and chariots, siege engines en standards.
Artists : Ian heath, Steve Noon, Clive Spong, Richard Hook, Manuel Krommenacker, Johnny Shumate, Jenny Dolfen, Peter Connolly, Kaya Gokberk
@SuffeteIfriqi Thanks bro I really appreciate 👍
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
F.Colin has shown that Bronze Age Eastern Libyans were linguistically connected to the later IA Libyans of NW Africa. By the 11th c. BC, their influence in Egypt had grown so significant that prominent Egyptian officials began giving their children the names of renowned Libyans🧵
For example, consider Herihor, a Vizier and High Priest, who gave several of his sons Libyan names. The 21st Dynasty was a period when Libyans were already exerting significant influence on Egypt, marked by the rise of a Pharaoh of Libyan origin, Osorkon the Elder.
Btw the relationship with the IA libyans is also evident at the religious level and notably with the Numidians (Massyles in this case) of the Iron Age (for example for the god "Uydan/udan?").
Like the migration of North Africans to SE Iberia from the 6th century BC, the Carthaginians seem to have moved Iberian communities to Algeria's western coast as early as the end of the 7th century BC, evident in similar funerary practices, ceramics, and domestic artifacts🧵
Consider the island of Rachgoun, near the ancient Masaesyle capital of Siga, which by the 7th-6th cent. hosted an Iberian population, mainly soldiers and their families. This group likely formed a garrison guarding a key strategic point along the Phoenician trade route.
Many of these sites have revealed weapons from the peninsula, notably Celtiberian types and possibly elements of an iberian shield. An inscription on one of the capitals discovered at the Andalouses is of a very specific type found only on coin series from the Cádiz region.
Short Thread - The site of Althiburos (Tunisia) : insights into the Culture and Lifestyle of an Ancient North African Community (10th - 7th centuries B.C.)
Located in northwestern Tunisia on a promontory surrounded by a wadi, the site's earliest phase dates back to the 10th and 9th centuries BCE. This early period of occupation is characterized by rectangular stone buildings with possibly in some cases apsidal rooms.
These early buildings were made of stone and earth and built "in a series of juxtaposed sections". The site lacked a clear layout, suggesting it could have been a small hamlet or a larger village. There may have been a sizable population spread across several villages.
Thread - Protohistory of Tunisia and its Aegeo-Anatolian influences - 2nd millenium B.C.
I would first like to emphasize that this is not an extensive analysis of all the data related to this period and place, but rather a summary of the major thoughts and conclusions from the work of Pierre Cintas on Tunisian Protohistory.
A first observation is that the phenomenon of dolmens in the Maghreb is mainly found in the north of the Atlas chain, while that of Tumuli and Chouchet is primarily associated with the high plateaus of the interior and the Sahara.
Thread - Muttines the Libyphoenician officer or how the incompetency of the Carthaginian army during the 2nd Punic War led to the loss of one of its most valuable officers
Before we begin, let's establish who the Libyphoenicians were during Muttines' time : they were the Libyans who embraced punic customs and enjoyed equal civil rights as the citizens of Carthage. Archaeology also unveils a nuanced reality, showcasing a blended cultural landscape.
Muttines (punic : MTN,« Mattan » : « Gift (of the Deity) ») was a Carthaginian officer from the Libyphoenician elite of Hippo Akra/Diarrhytus (present-day Bizerte). He grew up in the Barcid family's midst, and eventually became a prominent member of their high command.
Thread - The Carthaginian Army - Part III : War Elephants, Chariots and Siege engines
The Carthaginians were introduced to war elephants by Pyrrhus of Epirus (295-272 B.C.) during its sicilian campaign, leading them to promptly abandon their Tyrean war chariots. They first deployed elephants against the Romans during the Battle of Agrigentum (262 B.C.)
Carthage employed war elephants that were native to North Africa and were smaller compared to the Asian and African Savannah subspecies. They belonged to a small forest species (Loxodonta africana cyclotis), which lacked the capacity to carry a tower like the other subspecies.