The mutiny is real. It is also unlikely to succeed. Most probable outcome is:
1. The mutiny fails 2. The regime stands (for a few months) 3. Upon its suppression, regime becomes increasingly dysfunctional -> falls
In other words, Kornilov putsch🧵
Let's start with the "real" part. A sizeable force of Wagner troops have left their positions in East Ukraine and entered the Russian region of Rostov Oblast. This is a real mutiny
It is also likely to fail. Not because there is few of them, but rather because they are far away
Russia is a hypercentralised country. Control over Moscow is the only thing that matters. And it is unlikely these fellows will be able to reach it, let alone occupy it
Moscow is just too far away. Even if you leave all the heavy equipment behind, successfully transporting thousands of troops over >1000 km will be almost impossible
What you most probably gonna get is a mammoth traffic jam = a target for the airforce
Unless something radical happens in the next 12 hours, I bet on the regime surviving through this incident. Control over Moscow is the only thing that matters, and it is unlikely the mutineers will be able to assume it by this point. Too far
Again, if nothing radical happens
Still, even if this mutiny fails (as it probably will), it is likely to have the most detrimental effect on the Russian war efforts and thus on the regime's viability. If I were to find a metaphor to describe it, I would frame Prigozhin's mutiny as a modern Kornilov Rebellion
Now who is Prigozhin? He is first and foremost a junior member of the St Petersburg gang. With the rise of Putin, the gang members rose very high. Still, the initial status in the gang matters
Prigozhin wasn't a Putin's man. He was a Rotenberg's man. The vassal of a vassal
I can neither confirm, nor deny that in the late Soviet era Rotenberg brothers had a side hustle of burgling the Leningrad antiquaries houses. Obviously, such a business could not prosper other then under the KGB patronage
You snitch + do the dirty job -> they let you to hustle
I can also neither confirm nor deny that such a hustle involved sacrificing some of the gang members from time to time. Some gang members have to be given to justice. But the Rotenbergs had a saying in who will be sacrificed
At some point they may have chosen Prigozhin
After being sentenced to 13 years and having spent 7 in jail, Prigozhin was released. Still, he got compensated. I can neither confirm nor deny his patrons helped him with launching a restaurant business
He was a junior, invaluable member of the gang, but a member nonetheless
In 1996, a patron of Prigozhin's patron got a job in Kremlin and started his meteoric rise. Once Putin succeeded into power in 2000, the membership in a gang became priceless. It gave a direct access to The First One, the Access to the Body as we say in Russia
Invaluable asset
That's what you should know on Prigozhin's personal profile
1. A junior member of the gang 2. Not a valuable member. Worthless enough to be sacrificed as a scapegoat 3. But a member nonetheless
So once the boss of his boss becomes the Tsar, Prigozhin becomes a courtier
Now on the Wagner group. An important thing about the Wagner group is its somewhat outcast-ish character. You obviously heard about the recruitment of prisoners
Its rank and file may indeed largely consist of criminal/semi-criminal folk or just rando folk who got in by accident
But Wagner commanders are *not* randos. They are most typically the army/special forces/much more rarely intelligence officers who have been kicked out, usually for crimes or gross misbehaviour. And then had to start their career anew
Consider this guy to the right of Putin. A special forces officer. In 2008 convicted for robbery & kidnapping. In 2013 released to joined Wagner
Many others were kicked out for minor offences But the pattern is typical. Wagner is your second chance, after you lost the first one
A typical Wagner commander's profile is:
- Trained officer with relevant military experience
- Selected out from the regular forces, for crimes, misbehaviour or just not fitting in
- But given a second chance in Wagner
You are supposed to be grateful to the system. Are you?
If you consider that the Wagner leadership consists of the former officers selected out by the system, the constant dick measuring contest with the regular army becomes a bit more understandable
It is very important to prove we are better, an not only for pragmatic purposes
The peculiar Wagner iconography with a focus on unhinged lawlessness makes more sense, too. I don't think it is all optimised for pragmatic purposes, like propaganda. Like, why would you choose this type of propaganda in the first place?
I think that the exaggerated and sometimes counterproductive focus on being far, far superior than the regular army may have something to with most of the Wagner leadership being selected out from the latter
Now on the consequences. Should the mutiny fail (as it probably will, unless some radical development follows today), it will have the most detrimental consequences for the Russian war efforts
Observers describe Wagner as a mercenary army. But the truth is: all of the Russian army is a mercenary army. Some of the file and rank were mobilised, some enlisted voluntarily. But the overwhelming majority has no positive motivation to stay in the trenches except for salary
Foreign observers who ascribe the tolerance of the Russian society to the war to the "propaganda" are clueless. The preaching ("propaganda") is not worth much. Incentives are worth everything. Putin is smarter than foreign observers, so he is paying soldiers exorbitant salaries
"Beliefs move actions" causality is overrated
More often than not, it's the other way around. Incentives move actions and actions move beliefs. You do as you are incentivised to and then you rationalise why it was amazing thing to do in the first place
That's how it should be
Putin knows that and pays soldiers exorbitant salaries they would never ever earn as civilians
BUT
The more you earn, the less incentive you have to stay in the trenches. It's like playing with casino. At some point you better collect your winnings and leave
190 000 rubles a month may sound as a great deal at first. Which they probably are. But the longer you stay in trenches, the less likely you are to have a chance to spend what you have already earned
The mercenary army is getting tired quickly
Add here very little rotation and no realistic prospect of demobilisation until the war is over and what you get is the extreme tiredness. While being in defensive may be advantageous strategy-wise, it has a horrible effect on the Russian army morale, just as it always did
It is not impossible that the current situation would not even arise, if not for the Ukrainian counteroffensive. With the pressure applied some links of the chain can break (as they did)
Now about the consequences. Should the mutiny fail (as it probably will) what will follow is the decrease in trust and quite plausibly purges against the real and supposed disloyals
Much of the army's rank and file may be of questionable loyalty. They won't uprise, but they may not lift the finger for the regime either. Same goes for much of the warrior cops, etc. Even if they are loyal to the regime, the latter can't be sure
If I were to name one single institution that the regime may rely on the most, I would name not the FSB, but rather the FSO. Not the Federal Security Service but the Federal Protective Service. The outsized service of the bodyguards
We are all used to thinking of the FSB as of the modern Russian nobility. But if you look at the ministerial or gubernatorial appointees of the last decade, you will notice a rapidly rising share of the FSO officers
Putin's personal bodyguards becoming governors basically
Underestimation of the FSO role may have something to do with us always framing Russia in Soviet terms, always looking for the Soviet parallels and allusions
I would argue however, that modern Russia is much more of a cosplay of the Holstein-Gottorp empire than most would admit
Our focus on the FSB and FSB alone may largely result from our refusal to think about Russia otherwise than in Soviet terms. FSB-KGB-NKVD. We focus on the FSB and only because we have a Soviet parallel for it
We don't really have a Soviet parallel for the FSO. So we ignore it
But we do find such a parallel in the Russian Empire. The best way to think about the modern FSO is to frame it as a cosplay of the Transfiguration Regiment. At least that is where it has been evolving through the late Putin's era. The rule by the Imperial Guard
If trusted with guarding the emperor's sacred body, you can be trusted with anything (like ruling a province). And when it comes to putting down the internal revolt, it is probably not the FSB that constitutes the last line of defense. It is probably the FSO regiments
The end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The primary weakness of this argument is that being true, historically speaking, it is just false in the context of American politics where the “communism” label has been so over-used (and misapplied) that it lost all of its former power:
“We want X”
“No, that is communism”
“We want communism”
Basically, when you use a label like “communism” as a deus ex machina winning you every argument, you simultaneously re-define its meaning. And when you use it to beat off every popular socio economic demand (e.g. universal healthcare), you re-define communism as a synthesis of all the popular socio economic demands
Historical communism = forced industrial development in a poor, predominantly agrarian country, funded through expropriation of the peasantry
(With the most disastrous economic and humanitarian consequences)
Many are trying to explain his success with some accidental factors such as his “personal charisma”, Cuomo's weakness etc
Still, I think there may be some fundamental factors here. A longue durée shift, and a very profound one
1. Public outrage does not work anymore
If you look at Zohran, he is calm, constructive, and rarely raises his voice. I think one thing that Mamdani - but almost no one else in the American political space is getting - is that the public is getting tired of the outrage
Outrage, anger, righteous indignation have all been the primary drivers of American politics for quite a while
For a while, this tactics worked
Indeed, when everyone around is polite, and soft (and insincere), freaking out was a smart thing to do. It could help you get noticed
People don’t really understand causal links. We pretend we do (“X results in Y”). But we actually don’t. Most explanations (= descriptions of causal structures) are fake.
There may be no connection between X and Y at all. The cause is just misattributed.
Or, perhaps, X does indeed result in Y. but only under a certain (and unknown!) set of conditions that remains totally and utterly opaque to us. So, X->Y is only a part of the equation
And so on
I like to think of a hypothetical Stone Age farmer who started farming, and it worked amazingly, and his entire community adopted his lifestyle, and many generations followed it and prospered and multiplied, until all suddenly wiped out in a new ice age
1. Normative Islamophobia that used to define the public discourse being the most acceptable form of racial & ethnic bigotry in the West, is receding. It is not so much dying as rather - failing to replicate. It is not that the old people change their views as that the young do not absorb their prejudice any longer.
In fact, I incline to think it has been failing to replicate for a while, it is just that we have not been paying attention
Again, the change of vibe does not happen at once. The Muslim scare may still find (some) audience among the more rigid elderly, who are not going to change their views. But for the youth, it is starting to sound as archaic as the Catholic scare of know nothings
Out of date
2. What is particularly interesting regarding Mamdani's victory, is his support base. It would not be much of an exaggeration to say that its core is comprised of the young (and predominantly white) middle classes, with a nearly equal representation of men and women
What does Musk vs Trump affair teach us about the general patterns of human history? Well, first of all it shows that the ancient historians were right. They grasped something about nature of politics that our contemporaries simply can’t.
Let me give you an example. The Arab conquest of Spain
According to a popular medieval/early modern interpretation, its primary cause was the lust of Visigoth king Roderic. Aroused by the beautiful daughter of his vassal and ally, count Julian, he took advantage of her
Disgruntled, humiliated Julian allied himself with the Arabs and opens them the gates of Spain.
Entire kingdom lost, all because the head of state caused a personal injury to someone important.
One thing you need to understand about wars is that very few engage into the long, protracted warfare on purpose. Almost every war of attrition was planned and designed as a short victorious blitzkrieg
And then everything went wrong
Consider the Russian war in Ukraine. It was not planned as a war. It was not thought of as a war. It was planned as a (swift!) regime change allowing to score a few points in the Russian domestic politics. And then everything went wrong
It would not be an exaggeration to say that planning a short victorious war optimised for the purposes of domestic politics is how you *usually* end up in a deadlock. That is the most common scenario of how it happens, practically speaking