Kamil Galeev Profile picture
Jun 24, 2023 32 tweets 11 min read Read on X
Where is Russia going?

Prigozhin's mutiny looks shady. And that is fine. Many coup stories sound shady even in retrospective, as they often included some elements of 4D chess by the political leadership. Still, their consequences were real.

So let's talk of the consequnces🧵
Raising a mutiny in the south, far off from the capital may sound like a dumb plan. Unless this was not a plan at all. My hypothesis: it looks like a false start

23 June - Wagner mutiny
24-25 June - "Scarlet Sails" in St Petersburg

Both Putin and Medvedev were expected to come
The ruling gang is first and foremost a St Petersburg gang. The core of the Russian leadership including Putin, Medvedev and many others including Prigozhin were originally an extensive crony network from St Petersburg. With Putin's succession in 2000 they became the regime
Raising a mutiny in the south is a suboptimal plan for a coup

Seizing both the emperor and his heir apparent (seen as such by the elites) is the best plan ever

I don't have any evidence for it. It is just what makes sense. This is what any reasonable person would think of
A somewhat suboptimal plan to march from Rostov-on-Don to Moscow makes more sense if this was not a plan at all, but rather a backup solution once the Plan A did not work out

The best Plan A for a coup in a hypercentralised country would be seizing both the ruler and his heir
The Scarlet Sails is the yearly celebration culminating the White Nights Festival in St Petersburg. Its symbolism is based on the Alexander Grin's novel everyone in Russia knows

Putin usually *does* visit it. He came in 2022. In 2023, he was expected to come with Medvedev
Long story short, this looks like a false start operation that had to be launched earlier than planned. Perhaps, just one day earlier

At least that is what I think of
This mutiny could involve elements of 4D chess. Events like these often do. In this case, Putin could have a motive to stage an internal conflict to justify getting out of the external one

But 4D chess like this is extremely risky. Everything can go wrong and it very often does
It is highly probable that Kornilov's rebellion in September 1917 involved 4D chess play by Alexander Kerensky. It worked out in a sense they suppressed Kornilov. And by doing so, they paved the way to the Bolsheviks

September 1917 - 4D chess
November 1917 - October Revolution
Interestingly enough, Putin himself is drawing the parallels with 1917 :

"Actions undermining our unity constitute the apostasy of the nation... This is a backstab of our country and our people. Exactly this kind of backstab happened in 1917, when our country fought in the WWI"
These parallels are no accidental. What is happening is Russia is much alike 1917 than 1991. While most observers discuss the potential fall of Putin's regime, it would have been more accurate to frame it as the end of Lenin's regime. Or even better, of Lenin's assabiyah
According to Ibn Khaldun, an assabiyah typically lives for four generations: from the conquest to the downfall. It very, very rarely outlives this span. If I remember correctly, Ibn Khaldun himself could name only one single exception to the rule

Four generations, and that's it
For the current Russian regime its founding conquest happened in 1917. Revolution was a radical break, in a sense that it fully replaced the pre-existing elites. The old ruling classes were persecuted into the oblivion and often physically exterminated

A feth accompli
What followed next was again the typical assabiyah dynamics. The initially democratic assabiyah, once a broad coalition of heterogenous forces, consolidates into a centralised, hierarchical structure with the codified dogma headed by a semi-divine Supreme Ruler
Supreme ruler usurps all the glory of the conquest just for himself and gets rid of his old comrades

Very, very typical
But with all the countless old party members slaughtered, 1937 does not constitute a break anywhere comparable with the 1917. Elites massacred, but not fully replaced. So once the usurper dies, you may have a successful attempt of an aristocratic restoration
I would even say that the public discourse on Stalin and Stalin's repressions has a strong aristocratic flavour. Much of it is just the aristocratic criticism of an absolute monarchy. Hence the exaggerated focus on purges against specifically the Old Bolsheviks, etc
Putin may be critical of Lenin and his legacy. But the origins of the current regime derive from 1917. Lenin's regime has organically evolved into Stalin's, Stalin's into the Khruchev's and all the way to Putin with no radical breaks or replacement of the elites

Evolution
Consider this video of 1998. Prime Minister Kirienko introducing the newly appointed FSB director Vladimir Putin to the Federal Security Service he is now to lead

(Btw: He did not just introduce Putin. According to Yumashev, Kirienko had actively lobbied Putin's candidature)
Putin was grateful. He has a reputation for being grateful (an exceedingly rare quality). That is why he was chosen in the first place

Kirienko now effectively became a czar both for the domestic policy and for Ukraine

The closest we have to the Prince-Caesar Romodanovsky
What you should know, but probably did not:

46/85 of the Russia's governors graduated from the Kirienko-led "school of governors". More than half of Russian regions are directly managed by his men

Regional elites hate them all, of:

"Damn zombies" is a very typical feedback
"Zombies" should be read as a metaphoric description. Zombies (in this context) = people so brainwashed with a certain pseudo-scientific teaching and so trained into the meodologiya practices, that you just cannot deal, communicate or even negotiate with them
So what do:

a) Putin
b) the guy who promoted Putin in 1998 and whose appointees control more than half of the Russian regions in 2022

share their origins and genealogy-wise?
The work in Gorki. Gorki was Lenin's country residence in Moscow region

Putin's grandfather worked at Lenin's canteen as a cook
Kirilenko's great-grandfather headed this canteen

In a country like Russia they had the highest privilege one can have. The Access to the Body
If you do not fully comprehend what does the Access to the Body mean, then you should:

a) take yourself by the hair and smash your head on the table. Repeat 3 times
b) read this poem, especially focusing on stanza 3

Repeat until the full enlightenmentru.wikisource.org/wiki/Моя_родос…
"My grandfather did not sell the pancakes,
Did not blacken the Tsar's shoes,
Did not sing in the court chorus,
Did not jump into princes from the khokhols...

... So how can I be an aristocrat?"

Very accurate description of how does the social mobility work in the empire
Putin and Kirienko descend from the Lenin's assabiyah. Their ancestors were minor, servant-status members of the assabiyah, serving food to the Lenin's table. But the members nonetheless. Serving at the table = recipe for the upward social mobility

That's how it works
The assabiyah evolved from 1917 to 2023 largely uninterruptedly. There was no major replacement. And by now it is really old

Putin is the third generation
Kirienko is the fourth
And most likely, there will be no fifth one

What awaits Russia is the radical replacement of elites
Discussing the political developments in Russia as "the fall of Putin's regime" is spoiling the frame. It is not about the fall of Putin. It is about a demise of the entire assabiyah
Post-1917 replacement of elites was limited in scale. Post-1953, it was largely cosmetic. The 1990s to a significant extent were just the Komsomol leadersh changing a sign on their office door: "community-owned" NTTM -> private owned AMK

Same people, different circumstances
It is highly probable that in the coming years we will see a radical replacement of the ruling classes far exceeding anything we saw in the 1990s. The 1990s did not interrupt the continuity of the Soviet era elites. But the 2020s most probably will
The Western policy community used to discuss whether the fall and collapse of the Russian regime would be advantageous or risky. What they probably should be discussing however, is whether they are ready for this scenario if it just materialises without prior notice. The end🧵

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kamil Galeev

Kamil Galeev Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kamilkazani

Mar 1
Three years of the war have passed

So, let’s recall what has happened so far

The first thing to understand about the Russian-Ukrainian war is that Russia did not plan a war. And it, most certainly, did not plan the protracted hostilities of the kind we are seeing today Image
This entire war is the regime change gone wrong.

Russia did not want a protracted war (no one does). It wanted to replace the government in Kyiv, put Ukraine under control and closely integrate it with Russia

(Operation Danube style) Image
One thing to understand is that Russia viewed Ukraine as a considerable asset. From the Russian perspective, it was a large and populous country populated by what was (again, from the Russian perspective) effectively the same people. Assimilatable, integratable, recruitable Image
Read 32 tweets
Feb 8
Why does Russia attack?

In 1991, Moscow faced two disobedient ethnic republics: Chechnya and Tatarstan. Both were the Muslim majority autonomies that refused to sign the Federation Treaty (1992), insisting on full sovereignty. In both cases, Moscow was determined to quell them. Image
Still, the final outcome could not be more different. Chechnya was invaded, its towns razed to the ground, its leader assassinated. Tatarstan, on the other hand, managed to sign a favourable agreement with Moscow that lasted until Putin’s era.

The question is - why. Image
Retrospectively, this course of events (obliterate Chechnya, negotiate with Tatarstan) may seem predetermined. But it was not considered as such back then. For many, including many of Yeltsin’s own partisans it came as a surprise, or perhaps even as a betrayal.

Let's see why Image
Read 24 tweets
Feb 2
On the origins of Napoleon

The single most important thing to understand regarding the background of Napoleon Bonaparte, is that he was born in the Mediterranean. And the Mediterranean, in the words of Braudel, is a sea ringed round by mountains Image
We like to slice the space horizontally, in our imagination. But what we also need to do is to slice it vertically. Until very recently, projection of power (of culture, of institutions) up had been incomparably more difficult than in literally any horizontal direction. Image
Mountains were harsh, impenetrable. They formed a sort of “internal Siberia” in this mild region. Just a few miles away, in the coastal lowland, you had olives and vineyards. Up in the highland, you could have blizzards, and many feet of snow blocking connections with the world. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 4
Slavonic = "Russian" religious space used to be really weird until the 16-17th cc. I mean, weird from the Western, Latin standpoint. It was not until second half of the 16th c., when the Jesuit-educated Orthodox monks from Poland-Lithuania started to rationalise & systematise it based on the Latin (Jesuit, mostly) model
One could frame the modern, rationalised Orthodoxy as a response to the Counterreformation. Because it was. The Latin world advanced, Slavonic world retreated. So, in a fuzzy borderland zone roughly encompassing what is now Ukraine-Belarus-Lithuania, the Catholic-educated Orthodox monks re-worked Orthodox institutions modeling them after the Catholic ones
By the mid-17th c. this new, Latin modeled Orthodox culture had already trickled to Muscovy. And, after the annexation of the Left Bank Ukraine in 1654, it all turned into a flood. Eventually, the Muscovite state accepted the new, Latinised Orthodoxy as the established creed, and extirpated the previous faith & the previous culture
Read 4 tweets
Dec 16, 2024
1. This book (“What is to be done?”) has been wildly, influential in late 19-20th century Russia. It was a Gospel of the Russian revolutionary left.
2. Chinese Communists succeeded the tradition of the Russian revolutionary left, or at the very least were strongly affected by it. Image
3. As a red prince, Xi Jinping has apparently been well instructed in the underlying tradition of the revolutionary left and, very plausibly, studied its seminal works.
4. In this context, him having read and studied the revolutionary left gospel makes perfect sense
5. Now the thing is. The central, seminal work of the Russian revolutionary left, the book highly valued by Chairman Xi *does* count as unreadable in modern Russia, having lost its appeal and popularity long, long, long ago.
6. In modern Russia, it is seen as old fashioned and irrelevant. Something out of museum
Read 10 tweets
Nov 30, 2024
In his “Clash of Civilizations” Samuel Huntington identified eight civilisations on this planet:

Confucian, Japanese, Hindu, Buddhist, Islamic, Western, Orthodox, Latin American, and, possibly, African

I have always found this list a bit dubious, not to say self-contradictory:Image
You know what does this Huntingtonian classification remind to me? A fictional “Chinese Encyclopaedia” by an Argentinian writer Jorge Luis Borges: Image
Classification above sounds comical. Now why would that be? That it because it lacks a consistent classification basis. The rules of formal logic prescribe us to choose a principle (e.g. size) and hold to it.

If Jorge Borges breaks this principle, so does Samuel P. Huntington.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(