Post

More from @thepalmerworm

CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher.

@thepalmerworm

Apr 19

🧵Roots of Liberty
A Primer on the Natural Origins of Rights

The Great Divide: Inalienable Nature v Contractual Consent

At the heart of the American experiment lies a profound ontological distinction that determines whether a person remains a sovereign moral agent or is reduced to a managed subject. This is the divide between inalienable rights and contractual permissions. That term ‘ontological’ is of foundational significance because it remains the target for negation and usurpation by powerful interests vested in the subjugation of man through the negation of the ontological function of America’s Declaration of Independence and Constitutional Republican governance.

The non-negotiable ontological foundation of the American order is the recognition that rights are not products of human will or social negotiation, but ontological properties of the human person grounded in the reality of his or her endowed created nature. Modern ‘contractarian theories’ attempt to substitute the ground of rights from what a person is (which is inalienable) to what persons agree to (which is alienable). This substitution is sometimes concealed by a rhetorical ‘natural rights language’ used as a deceptive gloss. In operation however, once rights are moved to the realm of contract, they cease to be rights (inalienable) and become revocable permissions (alienable) administered by a system.

2/ Why is understanding & recognizing this distinction critical?

If we switch the ground of rights from ‘what a person is’ (inalienable) to ‘what persons agree to’ (alienable), so called ‘liberty’ becomes conditional upon compliance, which is not liberty at all - even though it is often experienced as consumer freedom. With that switch, authority is relocated from the individual to the system administrator; be it the State, a Corporation, or a Digital Platform. The individual is no longer sovereign; they are merely a service user within a managed environment.

3/
The following statements were predicated upon a rigorous ontological understanding that sought to articulate the ‘constitution of man’ which was fundamental to Constitutional Republican governance:

John Adams on the Law of Nature

"The rights of the colonists as Christians… and as men… may be best understood by reading… the law of nature…"
(John Adams, Novanglus, 1775)

🔥Adams establishes that rights are discovered through the study of natural law rather than being invented through the mechanisms of a civil compact.

James Madison on the Nature of the Right

"The Religion then of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man… This right is in its nature an unalienable right."
(James Madison, Memorial and Remonstrance, 1785)

🔥Madison argues that unalienability is tied to the very ‘conviction and conscience’ (moral agency) of the individual; internal faculties that the mind cannot, by its very nature, coerce or surrender to a social agreement.

Samuel Adams on Natural Rights

"Among the natural rights of the colonists are these: First, a right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property…"
(Samuel Adams, The Rights of the Colonists, 1772)

🔥By categorizing life, liberty and property as ‘natural’, Adams places them outside the jurisdiction of contractual negotiation or legislative adjustment.

George Mason on Inherent Liberty

"That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights… namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property…"
(Virginia Declaration of Rights, 1776)

🔥Mason asserts that freedom and the acquisition of property are inherent to human nature, existing as operational realities before the formation of any government (and/or corporation!)

The American Founders viewed did not view rights as political preferences. They deeply understood, upheld and defended them as observations of reality rooted in the ‘Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God’. This is why the article I wrote over 2 years ago for @corTheory had the title ‘The Constitution & Our Constitution; Symbiosis’ - precisely because the architecture of Constitutional Republican governance is ontological (not political and not ideological) in nature, in purpose and in operation.

Read 7 tweets

CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher.

@thepalmerworm

Mar 1

🧵Donald Ewen Cameron - MKUltra

The Engineering Turn in Anthropology

When Donald Ewen Cameron pursued ‘depatterning’ and psychic ‘repatterning’ under programs later associated with CIA MKUltra, he was not merely applying harsh medical techniques. He was operationalizing a specific instrumental behaviourist anthropology.

If the human person is fundamentally a patterned nervous system, then identity becomes contingent configuration. If identity is contingent configuration, then it can be erased and rewritten. If it can be rewritten, then power over mechanism becomes the decisive authority. This is the ontological relocation of the ground of the human person, in the name of ‘Science’™️. The instrumentality is utilized by conditioners/social engineers/pedagogues/media etc and the stakes are civilizational.

The Canadian Mansion Turned into a Mind-Control Experiment: Ravenscrag youtu.be/MZbom14MO5M?si… via @YouTube

2/ The Sovereignty Question

Individual sovereignty - in the classical, Christian and American Declaration-anchored sense - presumes:
A stable essential created human nature
An irreducible rational faculty ordered to intelligible goods
Intrinsic moral limits that do not arise from the state/corporation/supranational entities
Teleological ends that precede method

If the person is instead regarded as a programmable substrate, sovereignty becomes incoherent. What you might still call ‘rights’ become, in practise, ‘temporary permissions’ granted to ‘a modifiable’ system. See the recent Neufeld ‘ruling’ to understand the consequences of this engineered switch from sovereign person to ideological identity attributed to ‘modifiable organisms’. The real world stakes of that - understand the consequences. You have to recognize and acknowledge the foundations which were first removed in order to facilitate this ‘switch’ and recognize the false floor upon which the engineered substitutions were erected and scaffolded. This is NOT politics. It is NOT culture. Those are all downstream symptoms. The causal roots are the ontological understanding of man. Whether or not man as a sovereign human being is upheld and defended within the founding documents and governing instruments of a nation.

3/ The Behaviourist (pattern first) Model
(under which social engineering and ideologies flourish)

Under a pattern-first ontology continuity of self is neurological persistence with moral agency as conditioned response. Conscience is reduced to a brain-state and teleology is replaced by functionality. Under this model, law becomes behavioural optimization with sovereignty negated in function (even if retained in rhetoric) supplanted with ‘manageability’ (frequently utilizing consumer tactics and fear narratives to invoke and shape desired behavioural outcomes).

Read 11 tweets

CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher.

@thepalmerworm

Feb 16

🧵Creaturehood (not transhumanism & not post humanism)
open.substack.com/pub/thepalmerw…

2/
open.substack.com/pub/thepalmerw…

3/
open.substack.com/pub/thepalmerw…

Read 10 tweets

CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher.

@thepalmerworm

Feb 14

https://x.com/thepalmerworm/status/2022697994617843773

🧵Integrity of the Human Person - Soul, Mind & Body

To understand classical metaphysical realism is to recognize that a human person is not ‘a body’ plus ‘a mind’ plus ‘some information’. A person is a substance; an embodied, rational creature whose created soul IS the form of the body. Mind is not a separable commodity (not a ‘thing’ that can be extracted, uploaded, leased, tokenized, or assigned its own jurisdiction). Bodily integrity is not a negotiable wrapper around a more ‘real’ subjective inner self; it is the integrity of the same being. Inalienable rights arise from the kind of being you ARE (essential nature - ontological), not from the kind of function you can perform, identity you project, or the kind of system you can interface with. Hylomorphism is a metaphysical ‘NO’ to every program that tries to treat the person as a modular stack. It refuses the split that attempts to rationalize what Jennifer is warning us about in her article extract. I’ll break this down further in the thread below but for a TL;DR gist, here’s a very short video intro to hylomorphism and its negation in academia and education.

https://x.com/thepalmerworm/status/2022697994617843773

2/ The corruption - replacing ontology with biology

When ontology is replaced by ‘biology’, the human being is no longer approached as a unified substance with intrinsic powers ordered to real ends, but as a managed organism:

The body becomes a system (inputs/outputs, optimization, risk management).

‘Nature’ is no longer essential, but instrumentalized - confined to description without normativity (what is measurable is what is real; what is real is what is manipulable).

The human is redefined as a living platform rather than a moral agent with intrinsic intelligible ends; man, woman ….etc.

Once that happens, rights stop being recognitions of what a person is and start becoming regulatory instruments for managing a population of systems. Rights as a TOOL OF governance, not a BOUNDARY AGAINST governance.
open.substack.com/pub/jbilek/p/g…

3/ Bait & Switch - metaphysics replaced by method

The decisive hinge operationalized in academia and education. ‘Method’ promises™️ neutrality (🐍🙄 of course it does - the first big lie) procedures, metrics, compliance frameworks, ‘evidence-based’ policies, stakeholder processes, therapeutic protocols, behavioural nudges, risk models.

But method can’t tell you what a person IS. So it quietly seeds and reinforces in a substitute anthropology:
The human becomes whatever the method can operationalize.
The good becomes whatever the system can measure.
The true becomes whatever the process can stabilize.

That’s how a civilization moves from ‘rights are inalienable’ to ‘rights are permissions granted to controllable categories’ and look at those categories in the excerpt from Jennifer’s article. This sleight of hand does not deny inalienable rights explicitly - it simply makes ontological realism unnecessary to ‘administer’ the systems of the world that you buy into and feel you can’t opt out of without tremendous sacrifice. And lets face it - despite a secondary and tertiary education, who really understands what ontological realism is, enough that it informs their capacity not only to say “this is bullshit - now fuck off” - but also to present the exact precise procedural and legal reasoning in specific relation to the upholding and defence of inalienable rights as established in the Founding Documents? Those documents don’t defend and uphold themselves - that’s your job as formed responsible individuals with the knowledge, comprehension and articulation to do that. And of course, the spine to stand your ground no matter what’s thrown at you.
open.substack.com/pub/jbilek/p/g…

Read 8 tweets

CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher.

@thepalmerworm

Jan 15

https://x.com/thepalmerworm/status/2011473109258301711

🧵NOT a ‘Leftist Experiment’ (propagandizing = off the charts)

American civic liberty is not the product of politics. It is the fruit of metaphysical realism. The Founding’s self-government only functions when it grows from a prior ontological chain; the Creator-creature distinction establishes intelligible reality as measure, Aristotelian–Thomistic realism clarifies that natures are real and teleology is objective and Natural Law anthropology establishes man as imago Dei; a rational moral agent capable of judgment and accountable conscience. This thread provides you with more detail on the how & why.

https://x.com/thepalmerworm/status/2011473109258301711

2/
So then what is SCSR? Scottish Common Sense Realism (SCSR) does not replace this foundation; it is a defensive articulation that protects these preconditions from modern skeptical collapse, preserving first principles, testimony and the basic trustworthiness of ordinary knowing. Only on this basis can Founding jurisprudence hold; with The People as citizens not subjects, the exercise of popular sovereignty under law (not Democracy) and constitutional limits that restrain power because truth stands above will.

3/
The dead tree to the right shows what happens when realism is severed from its roots and you’ve lived through it - as your parents and grandparents also did. Nature dissolved into nominalism, moral order replaced by voluntarism and autonomy as gnostic - man enthroned as the highest authority. In that condition, the public cannot sustain self-rule, because judgment is no longer formed by reality but by competing narratives, identities and ideological ‘frameworks’. With realist metaphysics severed (denied, rejected, removed from Education and the Academy) Politics™️ then fills the vacuum. However, it does not simply do this as a means of parasitically usurping constitutional governance but also (and most powerfully) as a substitute metaphysic terraforming the mind of man. Terra/(terror!) (earth/material - remember Gramsci and his absolute terrestrialization of thought?!). Under precisely THIS terraforming of the public mind through Idea Laundering in the Academy (& Seminary) Ideology becomes a false root system. Most useful to Statecraft as it can produce endless agitation, enforcement and regime management. Of course it cannot form and generate moral agency, stable rights, or lawful civic order. It is designed and deployed to debilitate, destroy and negate them. This is why the Republic cannot be restored through politics alone; its roots must be restored first.

Read 5 tweets

CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher.

@thepalmerworm

Jan 13

https://x.com/thepalmerworm/status/2011065242558570800

🧵Failure To Articulate Reality

Subversion succeeds because the defenders (of e.g. a nation) cannot name what is happening. They are trained to interpret hostile action through the wrong categories. They are miseducated in a type of formation which produces permanent misrecognition and this is the ‘Education’🐍which has been in place for a long time. It guarantees policy failure no matter how many ‘facts’ are presented. Western nations are not losing because they lack information. They’re losing because they lack a realist threat-perception framework AND this situation serves specific vested interests, hence the refusal to acknowledge it at the highest levels AND the unwillingness to resource appropriate Education to counter the threats through equipping key personnel in addition to the public at large.

https://x.com/thepalmerworm/status/2011065242558570800

2/
So even when evidence exists, it gets metabolized into activism, polarization, disinformation, domestic extremism and the slogan which further serves to negate the American Constitutional Republic - ‘democracy under threat’ (America is not a ‘democracy’ and never has been, but huge efforts are in play to condition the people into accepting it as such, which serves the roll out of technocratic AI governance). HUGE marketing push on this currently. Observe how many times tech moguls and Influencers (and bot swarms) all push the term ‘democracy’ because it serves global governance mechanisms under emerging Communitarian models/systems and Networked States etc.

3/
The failure is to recognize political warfare in action aimed at epistemic collapse for the disabling of judgment - the failure to accurately name what’s going on. The decisive battlefield is the formation of judgment and the regime funding the destabilization survives by ensuring that the defenders (personnel and public) cannot perceive reality AS reality. Instead there is diversion into ‘fact checking’, personalities/scandal, money trails and partisan framing, instead of the deeper issue; what analytic firewall is missing such that personnel (and public) can’t even see (recognize) the operational form of subversion?

Read 8 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher.

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @thepalmerworm

CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher.

CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher.

CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher.

CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher.

CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher.

CJ the palmer worm; wife,mother, researcher.

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!