THREAD: CW: Why are my comments turned off? Here’s one reason. The right wing trolls who compiled a “hit piece” on me have published my abusive ex husband’s response to my restraining order application, but kept from you how the court ruled. So let’s put this to bed, shall we? 1/
The court recognized the lies he told in the document my trolls are sharing, and ruled in my favor, finding a years-long pattern of coercive & controlling abuse as defined under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act. They granted me my restraining order AND just renewed it. 2/
Not only did the trolls have to PHYSICALLY go to San Diego Superior Court and PURCHASE these documents, they only published HIS reply to help fit THEIR narrative. They also didn’t show you his arrest record for felony spousal abuse the night he took the door off the hinges. 3/
Further, the trolls have decided I’m the bad guy because I consider it abuse that he gaslit me about how much he had to drink & then drove us into a wall at 50 MPH nearly killing me. The trolls say it’s not, & that because I stayed with him after that, more abuse was my fault 4/
And now, if I tweet and leave comments on, I’m swarmed with traumatizing photos of me with 400 stitches in my head calling me a liar. This gatekeeping, misogyny, and trauma are designed to shut me up or get me to leave the app. It won’t work. 5/
I will NOT debate them about what constitutes spousal abuse, nor will I debate them about my lived experiences. I tell my story so others don’t feel alone, and bad actors use that to manipulate the truth to shut me up. 6/
It was ME, not THEM, who hid under the covers as he beat the door down while I was on the phone with a friend & 9-1-1. It was ME not THEM terrified as he left and came back with power tools to remove the door. It was ME not THEM who spent 4 days in the hospital after the crash 7/
It was ME, not THEM who came home to a loaded gun on the table in front of a drunk and drugged up abuser the night before Christmas Eve when I fled my home to stay with friends and file that restraining order application the following Monday. 8/
The trolls will stop at nothing to silence me. Well, I have receipts, too, and I’ve survived worse than them. If you want to comment on my tweets, shoot me a DM before Musk makes you pay $8 for the privilege and I’ll vet you personally and follow back so you can comment. 9/
Oh. It’s of note that the anonymous troll who published the hit piece follows my ex husband on Twitter. And no one reached out to me once for comment. Fuck those dudes. END/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let’s game it out. Let’s say Garland appointed a special counsel in November of 2021. That’s when Graves was sworn in as US Attorney in DC & Olsen was sworn in as NATSEC AAG at DoJ. That’s the FIRST TIME Garland had HIS team of Biden appointees to prosecute the top of the coup 2/
It would be kinda weird to hire a special counsel the same month your team finally got there. That team - btw - was delayed by republicans in congress. Not Garland or Biden. So why didn’t Garland get the ball rolling earlier in 2021 between March and November? 3/
Can confirm. I was drawn into a debate about military service and accidentally said it was my grandfather and not his brother who perished in WWII, and they’ve hung me out to dry with that error. 1/
First, when asked about my family’s service, I consistently reply with “we lost my dad to exposure to agent orange when he was 46, we lost my great uncle over Germany in WWII, and my grandpa was on the Gregory when it sank at Guadalcanal.” 2/
I’ve told my grandpas story a zillion times and have shared articles about it. He went down to the after steering room and manually operated the rudders until he was forced to abandon. Here’s an example and the article. 3/
Today’s Washington Post reporting contradicts Washington Post reporting from March 2022 that subpoenas for info on the leadership of the coup had been going out since Jan 2022. 1/ washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
The same day, the times reported the subpoenas included info on the fraudulent electors scheme. So it’s impossible that the FBI didn’t open an investigation until March 2022 as reported today by Wapo. 2/ nytimes.com/2022/03/30/us/…
It’s is *possible* the subpoenas were triggered by Michigan criminal referrals. But it’s not likely that DoJ would start issuing subpoenas the same week the referrals were made in January. END/
I’m going to say this one more time for clarity. Some folks seem to think there can be only two positions: that Garland is either a faultless messiah beyond reproach, or that he’s a federalist shill installed by dark forces to help trump. 1/
I’m not sure when nuance died, but reality is somewhere in between. Many seem to mistakenly think I fall squarely in the first camp. Perhaps those folks have missed the multiple times I’ve criticized Garland. Take this thread for example. 2/
BREAKING: THREAD: Wow! JP Cooney (who was investigating the trump PACs for Garland and now works for Jack Smith) wanted to open a probe into the top of the coup before Garland even got there. The FBI and MIKE SHERWIN shut him down. 1/
"In February 2021, Cooney took his proposal to investigate the ties with people in Trump’s orbit directly to a group of senior agents in the FBI’s public corruption division." 2/
"The plan called for a task force to embark on a wide-ranging effort, including seeking phone records for Stone as well as Alexander. He was urging investigators to probe the connection between Stone & the Oath Keepers, who were photographed together outside the Willard hotel" 3/
THREAD: Oh, but let me tell you how UN-politicized Garland’s DoJ is.
People on the right are crying foul, saying Joe Biden and Merrick Garland are going after trump for political reasons.
Are they though?
Not even close. 1/
First, it was Acting Attorney General Rosen - left over from the trump administration- that OPENED the non-partisan DoJ IG investigation into former DoJ officials’ potential interference in the peaceful transfer of power. That probe was opened BEFORE Garland got there. 2/
Then in October of 2021, Garland swore under oath to congress that he would accept the recommendations of that DoJ IG probe - meaning that probe was still ongoing in the fall of 2021. 3/