《1/12⟫ Someone asked how we can know the ongoing rise in atmospheric CO2 level is entirely from human emissions, since Earth's climate is so complex.


Fortunately, you don't need a climate model to answer that question. It's as easy as (steps) A, B, C:sealevel.info/co2.html
《2/12⟫ A. The bean-counters keep good track of production & use of fossil fuels and Portland cement, and simple chemistry tells us how much CO2 is produced from them. That's "fossil carbon." (Irrelevant side note: fossil carbon is almost completely depleted of radioactive 14C.)
《3/12⟫ There are also "land use change emissions" (e.g., clearing forests, draining swamps), which produce non-fossil CO2 emissions. They are poorly constrained, but certainly less then 15% of fossil emissions (probably about 10%).
sealevel.info/carbon/Dohner2…
《4/12⟫ B. Precise measurements of well-mixed atmospheric CO2 concentrations allow simple calculation of how the amount of CO2 in the air is changing.

1 ppmv CO2 = 7.8024 Gt CO2 = 2.12940 PgC (petagrams carbon)

To convert from PgC to Gt CO2 multiply by 3.66419
《5/12⟫ C. Subtract (B) from (A) for the time period (# of years) of your choice to get the net rate of CO2 removal by all natural sources & sinks, summed.
《6/12⟫ Let's consider, as an example, the one year period, calendar year 2021.

You can find all the relevant data here:


(You could do this same exercise with any year or span of years since 1958.)sealevel.info/carbon/carbonf…
《7/12⟫ A. Mostly from economic data, we know mankind added between 9.79 PgC and 11.60 PgC to the atmosphere in 2021. The lower figure includes only fossil carbon, the higher figure adds a high-end estimate of land use change emissions.
《8/12⟫ B. In 1Q of 2022 the average CO2 level measured at MLO was 418.760 ppmv, and in 1Q of 2021 the average level was 416.637 ppmv, so the level increased by 2.123 ppmv in 2021, which is:

2.123 ppmv CO2 × 2.1294 PgC / ppmv CO2 = 4.52 PgC (which is 16.56 Gt CO2)
《9/12⟫ C. In other words, the amount of carbon in CO2 in the atmosphere increased by about 4.52 PgC in 2021. But, at the same time, mankind added between 9.79 PgC and 11.60 PgC to the atmosphere.

(9.79 to 11.60) - 4.52 = 5.27 to 7.08 PgC.
《10/12⟫ So natural “carbon sinks” (the terrestrial biosphere & soil, the oceans, rock weathering, etc.) removed a net total of at least 5.27 PgC (=2.47 ppmv of CO2) in 2021.
《11/12⟫ “Nature” (i.e., net summed natural CO2 sources & sinks) removed at least 2.47 ppmv of CO2 from the atmosphere, yet the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere nevertheless increased by 2.12 ppmv.
《12/12⟫ That means the entire increase in atmospheric CO2 in 2021 was from human CO2 emissions. The only reason CO2 level rose in 2021 is that mankind added CO2 faster than nature removed it.

For a deeper dive see Ferdinand Engelbeen's analysis:


𝓠𝓔𝓓ferdinand-engelbeen.be/klimaat/co2_or…
@ThreadReaderApp @Rattibha @threaddotblue unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton

✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ncdave4life

Jun 21
Read 5 tweets
Jun 21
Read 7 tweets
Jun 20
Read 6 tweets
Jun 18
Read 11 tweets
Jun 17
@EthonRaptor @ClimateOfGavin @NASAGoddard 1/6 Eli, please tell me that YOU do not think CO2 which was FORMERLY in the air STILL has a warming effect!

I was SURE you are smarter than THAT!

Any two steadily increasing quantities correlate nicely. That doesn't mean one causes the other, of course.
@EthonRaptor @ClimateOfGavin @NASAGoddard 2/6 Our CO2 emission rate is currently about twice the rate natural sinks (terrestrial greening, ocean uptake, etc.) remove CO2. But it's mere coincidence the ratio has been near 2:1 for a quite a while. If we halved CO2 emissions the ratio would be 1:1.
@EthonRaptor @ClimateOfGavin @NASAGoddard 3/6 Coincidentally, for several decades the trend in CO2 concentration has been about half of the trend in "cumulative emissions."
But if we were to halve emissions that correlation would disappear entirely. Cumulative emissions would continue to rise, but CO2 level would not.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 17
1/36 It's amazing how effective the Climate Industry has been at frightening people, beyond the capacity for rational thought. Rutger Bregman @rcbregman, though a smart fellow, is nevertheless "terrified" by a miniscule (≤1°C), completely harmless, sea surface temperature blip.
@rcbregman 2/ 1°C is the outdoor air temperature change ("climate change") you get from an elevation change of only about 500 feet. 🥱

(That's based on an average temperature vs. altitude "lapse rate" of 6.5°C/km; 1000 / 6.5 = 154 meters.)
@rcbregman 3/ At mid-latitudes, 1°C is about the temperature change you get from a latitude change of only 60 miles (100 km).

(How different are the flora and fauna 60 miles from where you live?)
sealevel.info/2015_zones_hig… Image
Read 35 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(