Another behaviour thread: Why tactically ignoring is often a bad idea.
Scenario: A student is committing a minor infraction in the lesson. Rocking on their chair, chewing gum etc..
Teachers are commonly recommended to tactically ignore small infractions like these..1/13
Especially with students who often end up committing larger infractions.
There is logic here as it prevents a nagging atmosphere and reduces teacher-lead disruption. This can reduce the learning of all students. After all the rest of the class are getting on with the work. 2/13
The problem comes from social norms and the way humans learn them.
We need to know about a theory called social learning theory and the role a toy called a BoBo doll has played in it's Inception 3/13
Bandura et al were looking at the way role models were used by children to establish acceptable behaviour.
They filmed a series of people of different genders playing with the bobo doll. Some played gently and others violently 4/13
Suprise suprise the children who saw the aggressive models were more likely to play aggressively when they got a chance to play.
Bandura then went on to show that the ability to learn from others behavior was enchance if the role model was praised or punished afterwards. 5/13
This vicarious reinforcement was crucial and it's what is really important to our thread today.
If we tactically ignore the student then we establish this behaviour is acceptable. The saying "what you permit, you promote" is based on this idea. 6/13
The student who is rocking or chewing is being rewarded. They are being rewarded with status by you because they are getting away with breaking a rule.
Over time other students will see this and slowly the behaviour will spread. 7/13
The new norm is established and this becomes hard to claw back because the first student challenged will point to the previously permitted cases and feel they have been treated unfairly.
They can feel victimised and ignore any advice to correct their behaviour. 8/13
So if we can't ignore it but we don't want to disrupt the class by drawing attention to it what can we do?
We can use the brilliance of @Doug_Lemov TLaC "least invasive intervention"
Find a way to challenge the behaviour without breaking the flow of the lesson. 9/13
This could be a gesture, or walking over to their area. Or maybe a good old fashioned teacher glare.
My favourite for gum is to just pick the bin up and without breaking my flow of teaching walk over to the student and put it in front of them.
10/13
Tactically ignoring is a technique I was taught to use and have used for many years.
Now I have a greater understanding of psychology and the long term ramifications of what appear to be mundane issues I don't use unless the student has a specific identified need. 11/13
If the student has some self regulation issues or ticks etc then it is ok to ignore them in accordance with advice from the SEND experts.
This doesn't effect the norm because students don't necessarily see that particular student as a role model so the social norm is maintained
I hope you found this thread useful.
It's part of a piece of work I'm doing in preparation for @researchED1 national in September. I feel there is a need to establish a core theoretical foundation to analyse behaviour systems. So if you have any feedback I'd be grateful. 13/13
@researchED1 If you found this thread useful or interesting please RT the original (link below 👇) and follow me to see my previous threads on behaviour and any new ones
Often HoDs are asked to analyse the results in the summer and use this to inform their improvement plans.
Parking the idea that the timescale to do that for September is problematic, what should this analysis look like? 1/10
Schools sometimes want analysis of various grades for different groups (male: female, pp, SEND etc..) to identify the gaps and analyse trends over the years.
This was a huge strategy in the 2010s and somewhat persists now.
At a dept level it has a few problems 2/10
Firstly it has issues of sample size.
Some groups will be so small (SEND possibly) that their data will be too noisy to draw firm conclusions and trends over time will be pointless. 3/10
Behaviour thread: Maybe it is not all about relationships?
The two camps in behaviour are often simplified into 'relationship focused' and 'nothing to do with relationships'.
Apart from this being an unjust simplification I think it also makes a key mistake in terminology 1/17
A 'relationship' is not really what we are talking about when we discuss teacher- student interactions.
Think about the relationships you have with spouses, friends, colleagues for a second and the dynamics they have. 2/17
They often involve:
Give and take of information
Mutual trust
Discretionary effort
A balance of power
Among many other things. My thought is that it is impossible and also inappropriate to have this kind of relationship with all the students you teach. 3/17
So you've turned up to a class to remove a student who has disrupted to another room (whatever your system calls it)
You get them outside and they refuse to move.
Like all students they are protesting their innocence and someone else did X first 1/10
Firstly lets accept their are reasons the student might do this: 1. They might be right 2. They want to delay the inevitable 3. This strategy has worked before so its worth a shot 4. Their cognitive biases are making them feel like they are right. (2/10)
Often in these situations we get dragged into a negotiation and a merry-go-round of 'he said/she said' that takes time and energy.
Can we avoid this?
I think so. This is what I think is better.
Calibrated questions. Invented by @fbinegotiator in 'Never Split the Difference'
So you've got 40 mins of a dept meeting to deliver some training, what do you do?
How do you get the most out of the time for your whole team?
This is what I do: 1/14
1. Planning
Firstly you need to know two things:
What subject knowledge (SK) you want to improve in your team.
What pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) you want to improve in your team. This is the teaching of the SK and could be highly specific or a generic approach 2/14
Why both?
Put simply you have a range of experience and expertise in your team. By doing two things it ensures everyone gets something from the session.
It also gets the most from the time.
This assumes you have correctly identified the needs of your team obvs 3/14
Another quick thing on behaviour: If you think dealing with students who are getting it wrong by providing a rational case for them to change their decision is a good idea then unfortunately you are wrong. Let me explain..1/9
I get that we as adults need to not get emotionally involved in a situation. We need to stay calm of course, but there is no place for rationality in the students argument. They are not rational. And in fact very few decisions anyone makes are truly rational. 2/9
At best they might be strategic. They might have made a risk-benefit decision based on known consequences and their likelihood, but they will not be playing by the rational rules you expect. Most likely they will be completely emotional in their thinking...3/9
I spent some of today building a cpd session on assessment. I'm bored so here is a quick thread on some thoughts about assessment. 1/14
Assessment is all about choices. Figure out what you want to know and then work backwards to build an assessment system that is more likely to tell you those things 2/14
Workload. Assessment systems are cumbersome things and every decision has a knock-on effect. Each time you add to your system you magnify this time by the number of teachers you have. So an extra 30 min task could take up 50 man hours over the year easily. 3/14