Poor countries exist at the bottom of the global value chain.
In order to develop, poor countries need access to capital to purchase from other countries the labor saving tools & technologies that’ll allow them to begin building an advanced economy.
Enter IMF loans.
On condition of gaining access to these loans, the US uses its unilateral power over the IMF/World Bank to force countries into relinquishing control of their monetary policy.
Among the loan conditions is the stipulation that the national currency be devalued.
The effect of this forced devaluation of the currency is it purposefully undervalues the labor of the entire workforce.
This exchange value disparity is most clearly visible when tourists from the imperial core purchase labor in the periphery for pennies on the dollar.
This devaluation also makes imports very $$$.
And while it’s often argued poor countries “prefer” a devalued currency to keep their exports competitive, these arguments ignore how IMF conditionalities force poor countries into a ruthless race to the bottom in the first place.
This forced devaluation is now a significant component of modern imperialism, a system Lenin began describing over a century ago.
The real insidiousness of imperialism is how the mundanity of such a diffuse financialized form of exploitation makes it virtually ‘invisible’.
But not all countries remain stuck at the bottom!
A select few developing countries manage to climb the value chain ladder, as Japan did in the 70s, and China did in the 90s.
Yet in doing so, their value added exports began to compete with US exports and domestic industries.
Competition is not tolerated by the US, so when these threats emerge, the US intervenes more directly.
The primary way they intervene is no longer to force currency devaluation but to instead force countries into *strengthening* their currency relative to the dollar.
This is exactly what happened to Japan in the 80s with the Plaza Accord, in which the US forcefully inflated the value of the Yen to kneecap Japan’s economy. The resulting bubble led to Japan’s lost decade(s).
The US is arguably pursuing a similar strategy right now in the EU.
Which brings us to China.
Starting in the 2000s, the US began accusing China of being a “currency manipulation”, and accusations have only intensified since.
Central to the US’s frustration is their inability to bully China into succumbing to US monetary policy.
To the global hegemon, China’s exercising of fundamental monetary sovereignty is seen as an affront to the “rules based order”.
And what nefarious rules breaking does China engage in to “manipulate” its currency?
It buys US debt!
To recap:
US forces poor countries to keep currencies devalued as key pillar of imperialism.
Countries that manage to develop are instead forced to inflate currency to prevent competition with US.
China’s exports outcompete US’s, 🇨🇳refuses to cede monetary sovereignty, US mad.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There, it runs into other finance capital doing the same. In order to avoid a race to the bottom, the competing owners of finance capital agree to a temporary truce and carve up the world into a patchwork of monopoly territories.
But eventually, this too runs its course and the more dominant owners of finance capital subsume the weaker territories until there is but one imperialist world system dominated by a single country.
This is why Lenin called imperialism “the highest stage of capitalism”
China’s eradication of ETIM terrorism within Xinjiang shifted the staging ground for western-backed destabilization of the BRI—the largest infrastructure project in history—to Central Asia.
Ignoring this context will have you cheering on the next color revolution.
These protests were then capitalized on by western-backed terrorist squads that went around beheading state security forces and demanding the current government be overthrown, a goal obedient western vassals like the UK were more than happy to help with.
It’s simple to reconcile once you stop seeing Ukraine as a smol bean fighting Big Bad Russia and start seeing it for what it is — a US-backed proxy used to:
1- destroy Russia and
2- sever Europe from Asia by forcing them into permanent reliance on the US for energy & defence.
The US is using tariffs to force Canada and Mexico into stopping alleged cross border flows of fentanyl.
One view is that this signals the US genuinely wants to protect its population from fentanyl.
But another is that the US wants to become the global supplier of fentanyl. 🧵
After the US invaded Afghanistan in 2001, Afghanistan’s poppy fields went from a minor portion of global opium production to supplying the vast majority of the world’s consumption.
When the US finally left in mid 2021 and the Taliban retook control, opium production plummeted.
But while opium requires copious labor and vast fields of poppies to generate a significant yield, enough synthetic opioids to supply entire countries can be produced in a single lab by a few chemists.
It’d be hard to imagine a better drug for raising dark money.