Thread by @OwenBenjamin

It’s weird that the nuclear blasts vaporized brick houses but not the old timey camera recording it.
It’s because nukes are fake.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki never had any fall out radiation. The whole narrative and all the evidence is absurd.

Just to save time for responses.
1) the camera isn’t super far away it gets engulfed in a dust cloud. One shot it’s IN the house
2) the camera is not protected in a super duper bunker. Anything that vaporizes brick would vaporize anything you could see thru. Also the camera… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

https://twitter.com/owenbenjamin/status/1676100237939847173

The fact checker under this says that the camera inside the house that explodes was 5 miles away in a bunker haha
Also, in the shots you can see a cloud of debris reach and shake the camera. The film cameras.
The fact checkers are just a way for people who are addicted to fear… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

The baby boomers in this comment section are going absolutely insane that I question a very suspicious event from 80 years ago. Their kids can question their gender no problem. But they’ll be on here all day “debunking” me and watching porn

The community notes claim this image was taken 5 miles away in a bunker in the 1940’s.
And people believe that.
Flouride is not candy guys…

I’ve realized that nothing infuriates people more than finding out they won’t have a bomb dropped on them that will have “millions of years of fall out radiation.”
People keep telling me to go to heroshima and see for myself at museums. That’s the point. If there was fallout… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…