We all know the SR-71 Blackbird: The American cold war super-spyplane. It was based on the Lockheed A-12 design, which won a competition against Convair in 1959 to produce the iconic aircraft.
But the A-12 was just the 12th design iteration. There were others.
Read on...
It was commissioned to replace the equally iconic, and difficult to fly, U2 'Dragon Lady': A spybird with a 70,000ft service ceiling, whose window of service was expected to be short.
It's successor was required to beat that, using higher speed, higher altitude and lower RCS.
In 1956, Lockheed Chief Engineer Kelly Johnson kicked off project SUNTAN, to which only 25 people were cleared: A Mach 2.5 capable hydrogen fuelled aircraft, capable of a 99,000ft service ceiling, yielding the CL-400 design, a 300ft long hydrogen burning behemoth.
Far ahead of it's time, dogged by technical issues and incapable of long range, SUNTAN was closed down in 1959, setting the stage for the Archangel program.
@ToughSf But Lockheed was not the only company vying to replace the U2. The Convair FISH concept was a ramjet powered & boosted parasite craft launched from a B58. Theoretically capable of Mach 4 & topping out at 90,000ft, it would be boosted by a jettisonable twin ramjet booster.
@ToughSf A lifting body design, it would have managed aerodynamic heating through a 'Pyroceram' ceramic layer on the leading edges over a honeycomb steel structure and would land by opening intakes to two small turbojets.
@ToughSf Recap: A ramjet is a simple form of jet engine for high speed only: Lacking compressors, it compresses air with forward motion, typically decelerating air subsonic for combustion by inlet shock generation. A convergent-divergent duct allows expansion into a supersonic exhaust.
@ToughSf Archangel.
The Lockheed team iterated Archangel 1 & 2: A1 was 167ft long with a Delta wing, cruciform tail & two J58s in wing root pods, designed to cruise at Mach 3 between 83 and 93 thousand feet. It would have a 102,000 lb max takeoff weight.
@ToughSf Archangel 2 was shorter but heavier still, and incorporated two 75 inch ramjets at the wingtip, powered by high energy but volatile and toxic ethyldecaborane for a Mach 3.2 cruise at 94 to 105 thousand feet.
@ToughSf Ethyldecaborane was a high energy fuel Investigated in the 50s to enhance jet aircraft range. Borane fuels have a specific energy potentially 40% higher than kerosene, but the toxic exhaust and corrosive solid products makes them hazardous for turbine engines and ground crew.
@ToughSf Both the A2 & the competing FISH were rejected, specifically for weight on the former and platform risk in the latter. More generically due to the unresolved radar cross section reduction requirement on both.
Rapid design iteration commenced...
@ToughSf The A-3 was smaller, swapping the J58s for 2 modified P&W JT-12 Turbojets, coupled with wingtip ethyldecaborane ramjets on a high wing mount semi-tailless configuration.
The A-4 introduced a blended wing/body planform, the A-5 a triple rocket assist powerplant.
And the A-6...
@ToughSf The A-6 was quite beautiful.
The Lotus Elise of the program so far, it foreshadowed some final design features. A blended low RCS wing/body with inward canted tailfins, it featured a single J58 & two conformal ramjets. Weight was reduced with detachable landing gear.
@ToughSf At this stage both companies' projects were hit with harsh truths:
*Performance and low RCS don't pull in the same direction.
*Parasite craft are too risky.
*HEF fuels are too difficult to handle.
*The lightweight designs can't give enough range.
*The customer wants results!
@ToughSf Focus on the J58!
The Pratt & Whitney J58 was unique. Designed for very high speed use at speeds limiting conventional turbomachinery, it ducted 20% of compressor air to cool & enhance a ram-effect cruise afterburner.
@ToughSf Non-scramjet engines combust air that is compressed & subsonic. This also heats air, & material temperature limits what can be done.
At high Mach (2.5-3) most of the compression work is performed by the inlet & turbomachinery just adds drag, so 'ramjet' functionality is useful.
@ToughSf Johnson went back to the drawing board, optimizing performance focused concepts centred on the J58. The resulting A-11 was elegant if conventional and would complete a 13,000 míle mission with two refuellings.
However it had the RCS of a bomber. Not acceptable. Program extended.
@ToughSf Lockheed's final proposal, the A-12.
Nothing was put to waste, even the fuel doubled as coolant. The fuselage was titanium semi-monocoque, with long leading edge chines assembled with interlocking sawtooth wedges of titanium and radar absorbing composite.
@ToughSf The competition: The Kingfish.
In many ways more ambitious: This stealthy Mach 3.2 delta was Convair's entry for Project Oxcart. In the end however the A-12's lower technical risk, plus Lockheed's history of delivering such projects on-time & budget won. The A-12 was the victor.
@ToughSf And so began the A-12 story with the CIA, and later the SR-71 with the USAF, and the family tree the aircraft spawned. But this, and the manufacturing and design challenges of the aircraft & powerplant, deserve their own thread.
Hope you enjoyed this!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Last month Rolls-Royce won the UK's small modular reactor competition to develop and build SMRs in the UK. It could be a new dawn for nuclear power.
But who else was in the competition, what was special about each design, and which is your favourite?
An SMR thread…
What's an SMR?
A small modular reactor is a way of beating the brutally high capital costs of building nuclear power: By simplifying assembly (modularity) and minimising subsystem size so almost all of it is factory built you harvest industrial learner effects and low costs.
Boiling water vs pressurised water reactors.
All designs in this list are either PWRs or BWRs, the most common reactor styles today. I've a thread on the basics if you need it, but otherwise on with the show!
In April on a mountain in Chile the Vera Rubin observatory gathered first light, and this telescope will be world-changing! -Not because it can see the furthest… but because it can see the fastest!
The Vera Rubin telescope thread! The value of speed, and unique technology…
Who was Vera Rubin?
She first hypothesized the existence of dark matter, by observing that the rotation speed of the edge of the galaxy did not drop off with radius from the centre as much as it should. The search for dark matter, and other things, will drive this telescope…
Does it see a long way?
Yes, but it’s not optimized for that: The battle of the big mirrors is won by the Extremely Large Telescope which, yes, is meant to see a long way. Vera Rubin is not that big, but that doesn’t matter because it has a different and maybe better mission.
Rotating detonation engines: Riding the shockwave!
A technology that could revolutionise aviation, powering engines with endlessly rotating supersonic shockwaves. It could bring us hypersonic flight, super high efficiency and more.
The detonation engine thread…
Almost all jet engines use deflagration based combustion, not detonation, but while fuel efficiency has been improving for decades, we're well into the phase of decreasing returns and need some game-changing technologies.
One is the rotating detonation engine (RDE).
To understand the appeal of RDEs, you need to know that there are two forms of combustion cycle: Constant pressure, where volume expands with temperature, and constant volume, where pressure goes up instead.
Most jet engines use constant pressure. RDEs use constant volume.
As a new graduate I once had to sit down and draft an engine test program for a subsystem of a new model of Rolls-Royce aero engine. It was illuminating.
So here's a thread on some of the weirder things that this can involve: The jet engine testing thread!
Fan Blade Off!
Easily the most impressive test: A jet engine needs to be able to contain a loose fan blade. In the FBO test, either a full engine or a fan & casing rig in low vacuum is run to full speed, then a blade is pyrotechnically released.
Frozen.
The Manitoba GLACIER site in Northern Canada is home to Rolls-Royce's extreme temperature engine test beds. Not only must these machines be able to start in temperatures where oil turns to syrup, but in-flight ice management is crucial to safe flying.
How can humans realistically travel to another star, and why will it be an all-female crew that does it?
In this thread: Sailing on light, nuclear pulses, using the sun as a telescope and how to travel to another solar system. The interstellar thread!
Slow starts…
The furthest man-made object from Earth, Voyager 1, is one of the fastest. Launched in 1977, it performed gravitational slingshots off Jupiter and Saturn and is heading to interstellar space at 17 kilometres per second.
How long until it reaches another star…?
Um… a long time.
Voyager 1 is moving at 523 million km, or 3.5 AU, per year. Our nearest star from the sun, Alpha Centauri, is 278 THOUSAND AU away. If Voyager 1 was heading that way (which it isn't) it would take almost 80,000 years to get there.
It's the defining question of the energy market. Nuclear power is clean, consistent, controllable and low-carbon, but in the West it's become bloody expensive.
Are there construction techniques available to Make Atomics Great Again?
The problem.
Hinkley Point C, the world's most expensive nuclear plant, could hit a cost of £46 billion for 3.2 gigawatts of capacity, which is monstrous. Clearly nuclear needs to be cheaper, and in many places it already is. What are our options?
Steel bricks/ steel-concrete composites.
Construction can be chaos, and it's expensive chaos: Many bodies,many tasks, serious equipment. The more complexity, the greater the chance of delay, and delays during construction are the most expensive sort.