Tim Searchinger Profile picture
Jul 5 4 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
New Nature paper: Yearly emissions from global wood consumption likely to avg 3.5-4.2 billion tons of CO2e for next three decades. Equals 10% of annual CO2 emissions. = deforestation from ag. But mostly ignored by science & policy. Consump to grow 54%.
nature.com/articles/s4158…
Emissions depend on different scenarios of wood supply and use for energy. Emissions mostly ignored because many LCAs and sci. papers incorrectly net effects of new harvests against growing forests elsewhere. They would grow anyway so does not reduce effect of new harvests.
See also summary blog. Bad news: emissions will grow to 5 Gt by 2050 without mitigation. Good news: more efficient harvesting & production + less use of wood for energy would allow forests to grow more and hold down climate change.
wri.org/insights/wood-…
New model with more detail than prior model. It also credits forest regrowth and lasting wood in furniture, roots etc. Climate "cost" is the greater warming for many, many decades. Applies diff. discount rates to assign costs to this added warming, but result similar.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Searchinger

Tim Searchinger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TSearchinger

May 29, 2020
WRI has a paper out today comparing GHG cost of pork and dairy across countries. Costs include the lost carbon storage on ag land used. Land use costs are dominant, so one lesson: Reducing the amount of land used really matters! wri.org/publication/co…
Another lesson: Both pork emissions and dairy emissions across developed agricultural countries are pretty similar. Only 9% difference in emissions across pork of 8 of 11 countries analyzed. So getting big reductions in the future requires innovations. wri.org/publication/co…
Another lesson: What matters most is how much of the world’s productive land your pork or dairy uses. Much less, where the feed comes from. In a world with fixed land and expanding food demand, keeping down your ag footprint keeps down global footprint. wri.org/publication/co…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(