Ron Barbosa MD FACS Profile picture
Jul 6, 2023 15 tweets 9 min read Read on X
🧵regarding 'the crimp' and other technical pointers having to do with securing surgical drains with suture.

We'll go over my preferred method, other methods like the Roman sandal, some errors people make, and other factoids.
(1/ )



Drains are usually sewn in with Nylon, for the same reason that the skin is often closed with Nylon: it's minimally reactive. Here I'll mostly use silk, since I have that at the moment.

Here I have placed a simple suture and tied the knot, and am ready to fix it to the drain.
When placing a 'drain stitch', usually you first tie a few knots down, keeping the 2 threads equally long so you can wrap them around the drain.

Some surgeons leave the knot a little loose (L picture), and others don't (R picture). Leaving it 'loose' is probably less painful.

Sometimes a 'tighter' drain stitch is helpful though.
Here the hole in the skin at the drain exit site is a little larger than I would like (L picture).

I can close this down using the drain suture itself (R pictures). I wouldn't be able to do this if I left the knot 'loose'.



After tying the knot at the skin, wrap the 2 threads around the drain (upper L, then upper R pictures).

Cross the threads (lower L) and tie down to the drain. I prefer a surgeon's knot here to help get the proper tightness (which we'll cover next).





This is the most important concept in the 🧵.

Here I have tightened the suture so that it 'crimps' the tubing just a little bit. It's enough to hold it securely, but doesn't narrow it too much.

This 'crimping' of the tubing is what I'm trying to do each time I sew it in place.
Here is an example where I have made the 'crimp' too tight. There will now be a narrowed area of the drain.

On the right is Jean Léonard Marie Poiseuille, looking unhappy that I have forgotten that flow is proportional to the radius to the 4th power.

Some surgeons like to wrap the strings around the drain many times before tying. I don't have data, but I suspect it's not significantly stronger than wrapping it around once or twice. The overall grip on the tube is (probably) mostly dependent on the tightness of the knot.
One occasionally sees the 'Roman sandal' method. It is *very* difficult to find 2 descriptions of the Roman sandal that are the same, but basically the two threads are wrapped around the tube as shown.

This may be with (red arrow) or without an extra knot near the bottom.

Proponents of the Roman sandal technique say that when the drain is pulled, the strings will tighten around it, keeping it secure. Some also add the initial suturing procedure seen in the R picture.

Detractors say it's often less secure than a 'conventional' suturing method.

Many drains have a black mark on the tubing, which lets you know that the 'open' area of the drain is getting close to the surface.

Note that the mark is not exactly at the open area of the drain...there's usually still a bit of a gap there.

As you can see in the model, the black mark is out just a little bit, but as long as the mark is not out too far, the drain might still work.

Here I am alternately blowing air and suctioning, and because the 'open' part of the drain is under water, it still works (for now).
When a resident is placing the drain suture, it's common for the attending to say something like "don't sew the drain in".

Here I have grabbed the edge of the drain with the needle. It's easier than you think to do this.
A common error is to leave the skin stitch too loose, as I've done here. This lets the drain move in and out like a piston.

Aside from this being less secure, it also can lead to local infection as the contaminated drain frequently pushes into the subcutaneous tissue.
There are other suture methods, or adhesive pads, like IR uses, or like the ones used to secure a Foley. Those are beyond the scope here.

I'll leave you with another example of the 'crimping' of the tubing that keeps it securely in place without narrowing it too much.
⬛️

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ron Barbosa MD FACS

Ron Barbosa MD FACS Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rbarbosa91

May 4
With the ASGBI meeting taking place in Edinburgh, it is prudent to revisit my previous 🧵on the deaths in the movie 'Braveheart'.

As you may recall, the goal was to estimate how many deaths were preventable if trauma surgical care was available in Scotland at the time.
(1/) Image
Once again, we will make some assumptions here:

- rapid 'scoop and run' transport
- casualties present individually and do not overwhelm the system.
The geography of this area provides certain benefits in terms of casualty allocation, as we'll see. Image
Specifically...in Braveheart, most of the deaths occurred in the Battle of Stirling and the Battle of Falkirk (approximate locations shown here).

As you can see, most of the major trauma centers in Scotland are located close nearby, making the transport more straightforward. Image
Image
Read 18 tweets
Apr 4
Repeat🧵describing the Aberdeen knot:

an underappreciated surgical knot that is used to secure a running suture. It has been shown to be more secure than a square knot.

We will cover how to do it, what not to do, and a modification that may make it more secure.
(1/ ) Image
An Aberdeen knot can be used at the end of a continuous (running) suture as an alternative to a square knot.

With a typical square knot, you will either be tying one strand to the two other strands in the loop, either by hand (L photo) or with an instrument tie (R photo). Image
Image
But the Aberdeen knot is different. Instead of tying to the 2 strands, instead you'll use the single strand to go through the loop that is made by the other 2 strands.

Here, I'm holding the loop open with my R hand and using one of my R fingers to grab the string. Image
Image
Read 16 tweets
Dec 11, 2024
🧵regarding the Bovie, which is one of the most commonly used tools in surgery.

I have decided to reorganize my Bovie content into something that makes more sense, which will require multiple 🧵. This first one will cover the very basics and is geared toward students.
(1/ ) Image
Image
Briefly:
Recall that the Bovie is just a tool for completing an electrical circuit that includes a patient's body.

The current passes through the whole system, but because the tip of the Bovie is small, whereas the pad is large, the effect occurs at the place we want it to. Image
The Bovie is not like the light switch in your house that just turns the current on and off.

Instead, we may adjust the intensity of the current and we can also modify the delivery of current (which the machine calls 'CUT' and 'COAG') to provide different effects on the tissue. Image
Image
Image
Read 16 tweets
Nov 13, 2024
Short 🧵regarding the 'gold' Bookwalter ratchet and one feature that makes it behave differently from the regular ratchet, other than the fact that it rotates.

Also we'll look at a couple of other pointers about the Bookwalter knickknacks.
(1/ ) Image
If you use the Bookwalter, you're aware that the tray comes with a large number of the standard 'clicky things' (officially: 'ratchets').

It usually also comes with some gold ratchets (usually 4 of these) and we all know that these *can rotate*. Image
Image
This rotation of course enables you to rotate the retractor blade when it is connected to the ring. You cannot do this if the blade is connected to the 'regular' clicky thing.

But you may have noticed that the gold ones also just 'seem' better even when they are *not* rotated. Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
Nov 7, 2024
🧵regarding the introducer sheath commonly known as a 'Cordis' catheter.

We'll go over what it was originally designed for and why it ended up being adopted by other specialties for entirely different reasons.

Also we'll look at its accessories and see what's inside one.
(1/ ) Image
In the mid 1970's, angiographic procedures started to be done using introducer sheaths, which were much more convenient than passing all the devices through vascular cutdowns, as before.

There was some blood loss with each device exchange, and a sheath was patented to fix this. Image
Specifically, it had rubber gaskets inside the end that formed a seal and minimized blood loss with each exchange.

Shown here is the drawing from the 1977 patent and also a modern example of the sealing apparatus from a different company (I cracked the end open with a hammer). Image
Image
Read 19 tweets
Oct 9, 2024
🧵regarding the side hole at the end of most endotracheal tubes. This is the 'Murphy eye'.

You may or may not have noticed the Murphy eye before. Here we'll briefly go over what it is for, some unintended consequences of it, and (of course) a little history.
(1/ ) Image
Frank Murphy was an anesthesiologist with interesting choices in facial hair that worked in various places (here seen at UCSF). At the time he devised his tubes, he was at Harper Hospital in Detroit.

Only a little is known about him, and is found here:
bit.ly/3ZRK2O6Image
In essence, Murphy devised his own endotracheal tubes, and listed a number of things these tubes should have that he thought were an improvement over Magill tubes.

Among these was the hole at the end, which came to be called the 'Murphy eye'. Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(