🧵regarding 'the crimp' and other technical pointers having to do with securing surgical drains with suture.
We'll go over my preferred method, other methods like the Roman sandal, some errors people make, and other factoids. (1/ )
Drains are usually sewn in with Nylon, for the same reason that the skin is often closed with Nylon: it's minimally reactive. Here I'll mostly use silk, since I have that at the moment.
Here I have placed a simple suture and tied the knot, and am ready to fix it to the drain.
When placing a 'drain stitch', usually you first tie a few knots down, keeping the 2 threads equally long so you can wrap them around the drain.
Some surgeons leave the knot a little loose (L picture), and others don't (R picture). Leaving it 'loose' is probably less painful.
Sometimes a 'tighter' drain stitch is helpful though.
Here the hole in the skin at the drain exit site is a little larger than I would like (L picture).
I can close this down using the drain suture itself (R pictures). I wouldn't be able to do this if I left the knot 'loose'.
After tying the knot at the skin, wrap the 2 threads around the drain (upper L, then upper R pictures).
Cross the threads (lower L) and tie down to the drain. I prefer a surgeon's knot here to help get the proper tightness (which we'll cover next).
This is the most important concept in the 🧵.
Here I have tightened the suture so that it 'crimps' the tubing just a little bit. It's enough to hold it securely, but doesn't narrow it too much.
This 'crimping' of the tubing is what I'm trying to do each time I sew it in place.
Here is an example where I have made the 'crimp' too tight. There will now be a narrowed area of the drain.
On the right is Jean Léonard Marie Poiseuille, looking unhappy that I have forgotten that flow is proportional to the radius to the 4th power.
Some surgeons like to wrap the strings around the drain many times before tying. I don't have data, but I suspect it's not significantly stronger than wrapping it around once or twice. The overall grip on the tube is (probably) mostly dependent on the tightness of the knot.
One occasionally sees the 'Roman sandal' method. It is *very* difficult to find 2 descriptions of the Roman sandal that are the same, but basically the two threads are wrapped around the tube as shown.
This may be with (red arrow) or without an extra knot near the bottom.
Proponents of the Roman sandal technique say that when the drain is pulled, the strings will tighten around it, keeping it secure. Some also add the initial suturing procedure seen in the R picture.
Detractors say it's often less secure than a 'conventional' suturing method.
Many drains have a black mark on the tubing, which lets you know that the 'open' area of the drain is getting close to the surface.
Note that the mark is not exactly at the open area of the drain...there's usually still a bit of a gap there.
As you can see in the model, the black mark is out just a little bit, but as long as the mark is not out too far, the drain might still work.
Here I am alternately blowing air and suctioning, and because the 'open' part of the drain is under water, it still works (for now).
When a resident is placing the drain suture, it's common for the attending to say something like "don't sew the drain in".
Here I have grabbed the edge of the drain with the needle. It's easier than you think to do this.
A common error is to leave the skin stitch too loose, as I've done here. This lets the drain move in and out like a piston.
Aside from this being less secure, it also can lead to local infection as the contaminated drain frequently pushes into the subcutaneous tissue.
There are other suture methods, or adhesive pads, like IR uses, or like the ones used to secure a Foley. Those are beyond the scope here.
I'll leave you with another example of the 'crimping' of the tubing that keeps it securely in place without narrowing it too much.
⬛️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A simple but effective tool for cutting bone. As usual, we'll go over its design, how to use it, and why such a basic device still exists in the surgical toolbox in 2026.
We'll also cover its history and the tragic fate of Leonardo Gigli. (1/ )
The main advantage of the Gigli saw is that it's simple. It's just a wire and 2 hooks.
It doesn't require any power or any other equipment and it can be used in austere environments. If you needed to, you could amputate a leg out in the wilderness with a Gigli saw.
The technique is simple. The saw blade is dragged back and forth to cut the bone. It helps if you keep the momentum going and try to minimize 'stopping'.
Also, try to use most of the length of the blade instead of just the middle part, or this part will overheat and break.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
I found commentary from a 1967 edition of Look magazine that sounds...familiar.
First: junior doctor dissatisfaction and low pay, and UK physicians leaving for elsewhere: (1/ )
It has always been the case that though much of the conversation has to do with pay, that the true causes of discontent are more complex than that. Again, this was noted more than 50 years ago:
It was noted at the time (once again: 1967) that the practice of having doctors in training move around every few months was a problem. Which I'm gathering, remains an issue.
Temporary shunts for vascular trauma have actually been around for >100 yr. The first widespread use likely began with Prof. Tuffier in France, who used them in wounded soldiers in WW1 (1914-18).
The strategy was different though... (1/ )
Formal vascular repair had been described by Carrel, but was impractical in war conditions due to practically all wounds having massive contamination and delayed presentation, which made the vessels more friable and difficult to suture.
Bernheim had a famous quote on this:
Transport times were much longer then, and most of the wounded who were going to die by exsanguination had already done that.
So instead, the main problem of vascular injury at the time was probably thrombosis of the injured vessel with ischemia of the distal tissues.
🧵regarding the technique of 2-handed knot tying.
It's July again, so it's a good time to revisit this 🧵.
2-handed tying is becoming a lost art in surgery, but I believe it is worth learning. We'll start with just the basic steps. Advanced concepts will come later.
(1/)
If you want your first knot to be square, you generally *don't* want to start off with uncrossed threads (L picture).
Instead, it's better to cross the two threads first before you start tying the knot (R picture).
There are 2 ways to 'cross' the threads, which we'll see next.
When I do my initial crossing of threads, you'll see it can be done in one of two ways:
Either the L strand can be on top, or the R stand can be on top.
I can pick either one, but the one I choose will dictate which 'half' of the 2-handed technique I'll need to do first.
With the ASGBI meeting taking place in Edinburgh, it is prudent to revisit my previous 🧵on the deaths in the movie 'Braveheart'.
As you may recall, the goal was to estimate how many deaths were preventable if trauma surgical care was available in Scotland at the time.
(1/)
Once again, we will make some assumptions here:
- rapid 'scoop and run' transport
- casualties present individually and do not overwhelm the system.
The geography of this area provides certain benefits in terms of casualty allocation, as we'll see.
Specifically...in Braveheart, most of the deaths occurred in the Battle of Stirling and the Battle of Falkirk (approximate locations shown here).
As you can see, most of the major trauma centers in Scotland are located close nearby, making the transport more straightforward.