Neil Abrams Profile picture
Jul 9 27 tweets 9 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
My point, Aaron, is that you *don’t actually care* about the people affected by these conflicts.

You do care about exploiting their suffering to make a name for yourself. But you don’t care about them.

I can prove it, too.

A thread:
For starters, you’ve spent the entire war ignoring or denying one Russian atrocity after another—the massacres, deportations, indiscriminate aerial bombings, etc., etc. But now you suddenly pretend to care about…cluster munitions?

Gimme a break.
But let’s leave that aside. The civilian casualties cluster munitions will cause are miniscule compared to other things—you know, like RUSSIA’S INVASION.

Which gets me to your use of the term “U.S. proxy war,” a device aimed at eliding the culpability of the actual aggressor.
Whenever I criticize you for this, you respond with examples of U.S. officials acknowledging that America stands to benefit from a weakened Russia.

Well, if some in the U.S. call it a proxy war, Russia calls it a war of colonial conquest. So which is it?
Which label best captures the reality? You’d never try to answer that, because if you were to even acknowledge the obvious counterargument—that it’s a war of colonial conquest—it would lay bare the self-evident absurdity of calling it a “U.S. proxy war,” as you prefer to do.
But the fact is, you don’t bother to interrogate *any* of your ridiculous claims—including but not limited to your “U.S. proxy war” line. And that’s because *you do not care* about the stakes of the war in the first place.
You’d think that someone who’s genuinely concerned about the lives destroyed by Russia’s invasion would be willing to put some actual energy into understanding it.

But that ain’t you, is it, @aaronjmate?

Remember this shitshow?
@aaronjmate The reason you don’t bother trying to understand the conflicts you talk about is that it’s all a game to you. The actual humans affected are just a bunch of props that serve to support this silly grift you’re using to make a name for yourself.
@aaronjmate If you cared one iota about the lives impacted by the war, you wouldn’t keep calling for “peace” without addressing the blindingly obvious objection: That such a deal would doom any Ukrainians trapped under Russian control to further atrocities.
@aaronjmate That’s what exposes you for what you are, @aaronjmate: Not a peace advocate but a peace-troller—someone who disingenuously champions “peace” in order to deflect from an honest discussion of the conflict.
@aaronjmate Still, the most revealing sign of your rank nihilism isn’t the peace-trolling; it’s the atrocity-denial. In short, you’ve never met a Russian atrocity you’re not willing to blame on Ukraine, no matter how much idiotic gaslighting it takes to get you there.
@aaronjmate Remember when you retweeted an obviously false timeline about Bucha in an attempt to imply that Ukraine and not Russia was responsible?

Seriously, guys, it’s impossible to overstate how dumb this conspiracy theory was. For more, see my thread:
@aaronjmate When the ensuing months brought forth a mountain of evidence proving Bucha was the work of Russian and not Ukrainian forces, did you bother to correct your previous statement?

Nope—the reason being, you DON’T GIVE A SHIT.
@aaronjmate But you did deny having ever insinuated Ukrainian culpability in the first place. Not only that; you did so in the very same breath in which you suggested Ukraine’s guilt for *another* Russian atrocity, the bombing of the Mariupol theater.
@aaronjmate Never mind that weeks *before* you denied Russia’s responsibility for the Mariupol theater attack, the AP published a definitive investigation refuting the claim that Ukraine did it.

Go ahead; check out the dates on the two screenshots below:

@aaronjmate That’s not even to mention all the other investigations—by Amnesty International, the OSCE, etc.—demonstrating Russia and not Ukraine destroyed the theater.

Any acknowledgement of these on your timeline? Nope—because, again, you don’t actually care about any of this.

@aaronjmate And let’s not forget your braindead denial of Russia’s child-deportations. Despite all the independent investigations and the CONFESSIONS OF RUSSIAN OFFICIALS, you still insisted “the only source I can see is a State Department-funded group.”
@aaronjmate Seriously, kids, find someone who loves you the way Aaron Maté loves not doing research.
@aaronjmate Well at least you did the honorable thing by coming out and correcting your previous…Oh god I’m sorry, I couldn’t get through that without falling off my chair.

No, you never did correct your previous statements denying the existence of Russia’s child-deportation program.
@aaronjmate Oh, and there’s also your recent efforts to cast doubt on Russia’s culpability for the Nova Kakhovka dam catastrophe.

Any plans to correct the record in light of recent evidence, Aaron? Of course not, as that would imply you actually give a rat’s ass about the victims.



@aaronjmate But yeah, @aaronjmate, I’m sure the families of the victims in all these atrocities *really* appreciate the work you’re doing—what with your efforts to sow doubt about the perpetrator’s guilt and all. You obviously care deeply about them and empathize with their plight.
@aaronjmate It’s not just that you betray your own moral indifference; you seek to instill it in your audience too. Like, your entire shtick is to convince people that Ukraine is at least as culpable as Russia, thereby injecting moral ambiguity into a situation that demands moral clarity.
@aaronjmate By the way, @aaronjmate, you have yet to mount anything resembling a respectable retort to my recent examination of your Russiagate nonsense.

As with all your propaganda, the closer one looks, the dumber it’s revealed to be.

(Link in bio)





@aaronjmate I can’t know for sure what motivates you, @aaronjmate, but I’ll take a stab at it anyway. You want to become famous and respected like your father. Only you lack his intellect, his originality, his work-ethic, his expertise, and, most of all, his empathy. So you never will.
@aaronjmate When it comes down to it, you’re a mediocrity, one utterly lacking an appropriate moral compass. So if your father has already left a positive mark on humanity, all you can claim is a putrid trail of apologias in the service of autocrats, war criminals, and imperialists.
@aaronjmate You’re living a lie, @aaronjmate. You pose as a progressive but can’t empathize with the oppressed. You feign expertise but don’t know shit about shit. That smug cynicism you project is but a transparent veneer for a naïve and moronic understanding of the world.
@aaronjmate Basically, @aaronjmate, you’re an empty vessel, devoid of any recognizable values or morals and filled only with a vacuous craving to advance your grift. You can continue lying to your audience, but let’s hope you’re not dumb enough to believe your own bullshit.

/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Neil Abrams

Neil Abrams Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @neil_abrams

Jun 26
Last time, we examined Russiagate’s central figure, billionaire Kremlin-proxy Oleg Deripaska, and his bid to shape the Trump presidency.

Today we look at his origins in one of the most violent and generally insane chapters of Russia’s post-Soviet history: The aluminum wars. 🧵
Link, as always, is at the bottom of the thread.
While Deripaska would much prefer to be known as an ordinary malevolent billionaire, he has long faced allegations, including from the U.S. government, of having ties to organized crime.

But is there really any truth to that?

(Spoiler alert) Yes, yes there is.
Read 19 tweets
May 8
Russiagate, pt. 2:

When revelations emerged of a 2016 meeting between Trump’s campaign manager and a reputed Russian spy, prominent collusion-deniers @mtaibbi and @aaronjmate sprang into action. The result was two desperate and dishonest interviews.

My latest for The Detox:🧵 Image
@mtaibbi @aaronjmate As always, the link to the piece is in the final tweet of the thread.
@mtaibbi @aaronjmate A 2020 report by a GOP-led Senate committee claimed Paul Manafort met with alleged Russian spy Konstantin Kilimnik during the 2016 campaign. It also reported that he passed Kilimnik sensitive internal polling data which may have aided Russia’s interference in the election. Image
Read 14 tweets
May 6
A attribute shared by the neofascist right and tankie left is an utter repulsion at the thought of examining evidence.
“I have no *evidence* that schools are indoctrinating children into Marxism; I just know it’s happening.”

“I have no *evidence* that all mainstream journalists are intentionally spreading propaganda on behalf of U.S. imperialism; I just know it’s happening.”
“I have no *evidence* that Jan. 6th was a false-flag by Antifa; I just know it was.”

“I have no *evidence* that Bucha was a false-flag by Ukrainian Nazis; I just know it was.”
Read 4 tweets
May 2
To Russiagate believers, the Trump campaign plainly colluded with Russia. To detractors, the whole idea of collusion was a wild conspiracy theory born of wishful thinking.

The believers, it turns out, were correct. Only they tended to miss what was most important.🧵 Image
As always, the link to the piece is in the final tweet of the thread.
This is part 1 of a multipart series on Russiagate. Drawing on public filings, it pulls together some of the most critical pieces of the affair. These pieces, we’ll see, have been overlooked by most commentators, including both deniers and proponents of the collusion theory. Image
Read 20 tweets
May 1
OK, so Richard Sakwa, Emeritus Professor of Russian and European Politics at the University of Kent, has now dived headlong into Grayzone-level atrocity-denial. 🧵
As many of you know, Sakwa has been a prominent Russia-apologist for a long time. Later, in 2021, he had a book manuscript ready about Russia's supposedly benign foreign policy aims. Then, in mid-2022, this happened:
Pretty bad, right? Well, it gets worse. This morning, @AnnaGunin brought to our attention an interview Sakwa did with...The Grayzone News.

Thank you, Anna. thegrayzone.com/2022/04/25/us-…
Read 6 tweets
Apr 30
Last week I wrote a rather angry tirade entitled “Dear Illustrious Professors of International Relations: STOP. TALKING. ABOUT. UKRAINE.”

It generated a lot of criticism, much of it reasonable. So yesterday, I published an amended restatement.🧵 Image
As always, I’ll include the link in the last tweet in the thread.
The essay was a response to the incessant takes from high-profile scholars in high-profile outlets calling on the West to force Ukraine and Russia to the negotiating table. The idea is that Ukraine would relinquish land to Russia in exchange for peace.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(