1/Judge Cannon set the date for this Friday's pretrial CIPA hearing on 6/26. Today on 7/10, 4 days before the hearing, Nauta's counsel asked for another date. Most judges would tell him to appear virtually & file a timely motion advising the court of any conflicts in the future.
2/There's reporting Cannon called the other Judge to compare calendars & a day next week may be available. I've never had a judge clear my calendar for me & I practice in a district where the bench & bar have very good relationships. Maybe she was trying to make it easy.
3/In fact, a new date on 7/18 has just been agreed to. Extra days add up over time. This is just a conference to get classified discovery started-it's about scheduling. Nauta looks like he's carrying Trump's water in court like he does as his valet at work. The reputation of our
4/criminal justice system is on the line. Can the court treat Trump like other defendants & deliver justice or does he get breaks no one else does? It comes down to whether the case gets tried in time for voters to be informed. No reason it shouldn't be. Little delays matter.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/In the wake of SCOTUS's decision to end affirmative action in higher education, a group of students filed a complaint with the Department of Education, challenging Harvard’s use of legacy and donor status to give applicants a preference in admissions. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/This is not a lawsuit filed in federal court, it’s a complaint filed with an executive branch agency. That was the right approach here, and it’s worth taking a moment to understand why, as challenges of this type begin to percolate. Why not just file a lawsuit in federal court?
3/The cases SCOTUS just decided alleged Harvard & UNC engaged in intentional discrimination--the affirmative use of race as criteria for admissions. Individuals can challenge intentional discrimination in court under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act & the 14th Amendment.
1/Donald Trump has until this coming Thursday, July 6, to respond to the government’s motion to set the trial date in the classified-documents prosecution for December 11, 2023. How hard can Trump try to delay the case?
2/We’ll be counting the ways on Thursday. It would be a surprise if Trump agreed to the December trial date. The immutable truth is that Trump doesn’t want to face justice at the hands of a jury in a courtroom where he is not in control. Especially not with Jack Smith prosecuting
How strategic is Smith's request for a December date & how does the Speedy Trial Act come into play? If you want to understand the legal issues, read this morning's edition of my newsletter, Civil Discourse. Sign up & have it delivered to your inbox https://t.co/LhNQMXn7fDjoycevance.substack.com/p/the-week-ahe…
In one of its final cases for the term, 303 Creative, the Court permits a web designer who says making gay wedding sites violates her religious beliefs to post a notice refusing to work with gay couples before they even come to her. Justice Sotomayor writes the dissent:
The majority says it's speech. Justice Sotomayor says it's conduct & that the 1st Amendment doesn't protect discrimination, anyhow.
Public accommodations laws that prohibit discrimination against protected classes of people serve two purposes: equal access & equal dignity. Justice Sotomayor explains:
1/It's Dobbs Day, the anniversary of SCOTUS's decision to end women's right to make their own health care choices. Alabama's Gov was joined by many of the state's GOP electeds in celebrating-"Alabama will always fight to protect our babies," she said al.com/news/2023/06/g…
3/A state official said the contributing factors include poverty, lack of education & lack of places that provide maternal care. Also, the gov's failure to explains medicaid wsfa.com/2022/11/18/adp…
1/It's impossible to pull out just one quote from this stunning @propublica report. Justice Alito vacationed with & at the expense of people, one of whom had cases in front of the Court Alito participated in. He says he didn't have to report it. propublica.org/article/samuel…
2/ One flight Alito took cost more than $100K to charter. "If you were good friends, what were you doing ruling on his case?..&if you weren’t good friends, what were you doing accepting this?” an ethics expert asks. It's long but flag this important piece & make sure to read it.
3/Alito was asked comment before it was published. He declined to, but published in the Wall Street Journal. The man to his left in the photo is hedge fund billionaire Paul Singer who "has repeatedly asked the Supreme Court to rule in his favor in high-stakes business disputes"
There is the sense of inexplicable delay in investigating Trump during Garland's 1st year & reporting that the FBI was very reluctant--usually its prosecutors who are concerned about whether there's sufficient predication.