Tom Nichols Profile picture
Jul 13 8 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Each time I see a story like this, it's a reminder that there is no actual Russian strategic goal in this war: The idea of "defeating" Ukraine and capturing it whole went down the tubes over a year ago. All that's left for Russia is fighting over map squares. /1
This leaves Russian forces not knowing what to do even if they *could* win on the ground in various areas (which they're not.) As we teach at US war colleges: operational victories do not automatically translate to strategic success, esp if you have no idea what your goals are./2
I suppose "Do not keep losing territory in areas you invaded" is a "goal," but it's by definition temporary. "Capture Kyiv and force a surrender" was the Kremlin order but that plan went to shit; Russian forces now find themselves fighting because those are their orders. /3
The Ukrainians, OTOH, have a clear goal: Expel the invaders and restore control over national territory. The Russian goal has degraded to "don't let them do that, or at least not too fast," because Moscow is paralyzed and dumbfounded that its only plan failed instantly. /4
This means that Russia is going to keep feeding men into the meat grinder. But Putin doesn't care: He's trapped now, and has to keep inflicting murder on Ukrainians (and bleed his own army) because he doesn't know what else to do. /5
Prigozhin seemed to grasp this, but Prigozhin's not exactly Clausewitz either, and mostly he was pissed that his guys were getting shafted by the Defense Ministry.
These are not very bright guys, as the saying goes, and things are out of control. /6
Key problem nopw is that there's nothing to negotiate over. Even things Russia *claimed* to want - keeping Ukraine out of the West's orbit - are no longer possible.
The bigger problem is that Russia itself now has no idea why it's fighting. And you can't negotiate with that. /7
You can't negotiate with a state whose only goal is revenge for its own failures. All you can do is keep making them pay the price until they withdraw. /8x

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Nichols

Tom Nichols Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RadioFreeTom

Jul 8
An important line from the @DavidAFrench piece today: "About half of self-identified evangelicals now attend church monthly or less often. They have religious zeal, but they lack religious community. So they find their band of brothers and sisters in the Trump movement." /1
But think about that: It suggests how shallow the roots are of a particular kind of religious belief that is less a belief system than an expression of social identity. (If your replacement for Christian worship is a Trump rally, maybe church-going wasn't about Christ.) /2
I've seen that with ethnic churches, where being from a certain country is more important than the mass or liturgy. It's not a surprise that the collapse of some strands of evangelicalism led to the cultish experience of Trumpism. /3
Read 5 tweets
Jun 30
I was thinking about this today while, of all things, hearing John Denver.
Bear with me.
I was listening to "Country Roads" and thinking of the great diversity of America. I was on my way to a beach in RI, but I've seen the beauty of WV.
All of it is America.
/1
When I would travel in the old USSR, or even in the new Russia, if you ran into anyone from the United States, it was like family.
Boston? Wheeling? Jackson? Didn't matter. It was like encountering long-lost cousins.
/2
As much as I've been a part of the Blue/Red state divide, I hate it. And sure, I can blame some of it on the Dems, but elite culture warriors in the conservative media really created the sense that you had to hate people based on their license plates. /3
Read 6 tweets
Jun 9
Sigh.
So, a short thread on pardoning Nixon.
It was the right thing to do.
/1
Trump has been up to his eyeballs in crimey stuff since he was a young man. He's seen people do time. He's been around the mob. He is not deterrable; he is a sociopath and he doesn't see himself as subject to the rules by which others live. So, Nixon's pardon means nothing. /2
People around Nixon went to jail, and did time, including the freakin' Attorney General, who did nearly 2 years in the jug. And yet, no one since has been very much deterred by that.
So, enough with how tougher outcomes in Watergate could have deterred Trump. /3
Read 6 tweets
May 6
I'm going to go all Emily Post here and say that some titles are lifetime titles as a matter of protocol and respect, rather than right granted by the government. (I say this as a holder of one of them.) But "president", as Ms Post would note, is not one of them. /1
Not so long ago, America had one "president as a time" and only the holder of the title used it, as is proper for a "presiding" officer. It's why the Senate president is only president on the podium. Calling all former presidents "president" is a mistake. /2
When JFK called Ike for advice during the Cuban crises, Ike called him "Mr. President" and JFK called him "General." This was a time when people understood the use of titles. No one keeps the title of President; they hold it in trust for all of us for four years at a time.
/3
Read 4 tweets
Apr 23
For all of you who think Musk is some agent of Saudi investors or other nefarious actors who you think want to destroy Twitter, consider this: They're probably wincing right now. States with agendas want a strong and authoritative Twitter, not a joke site. Bear with me. /1
If your goal is to spread your agenda, you want the venue to be respected, full of dependable sources, so that your influence operations can be one more among those sources. If you're putting out bullshit, you want it on the same rack as the NYT and WaPo, not tabloids. /2
You also want to use your influence with the owner so that when you slip pollution into the info stream, it doesn't get lost. There are things regimes want to communicate. You want to create sources that *look* dependable and real. /3
Read 7 tweets
Apr 16
Since I hate to leave a debate without granting at least some points to my critics - seriously - let me now tell what I *do* worry about when it comes to American fascism.

Because I am not Pollyanna on this stuff. And I worry more than you might think. /1
The things I look from a US fascist movement:
1. Organized campaigns of violence against democratic institutions, including courts, legislatures, and the press. (One jacquerie on J6 isn't it, but it was a *severe* test.) Armed ppl in legislative chambers has happened. Red flag./2
If that violence stops the functioning of courts and other institutions. (Again, *organized violence - not just one-offs, lone wolves, or some whack-job rioters.) I was, I will admit, apprehensive about how Trump's arraignment would go.
It went well. Good. /2
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(