This Model Prosecution Memo (264 pp.) published by @just_security and authored by @NormEisen, @NoahBookbinder, @DonaldAyer6, @StantonLaw, @Edanyaperry, @DebraPerlin, and Kayvan Farchadi, is an extraordinary, compelling -- and historic -- prosecutorial analysis of the offenses
President Trump could be charged with as a result of his effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election and the January 6 insurrection on the U.S. Capitol that obstructed and prevented the Joint Session from counting the electoral votes for the American presidency that day.
The authors meticulously and exactingly analyze each individual element of each separate offense, amass the publicly known evidence that supports each individual element of each of the separate offenses,
and conclude that "there likely is sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain" convictions for the offenses analyzed, which is the Department of Justice's standard for charging federal crimes.
The authors emphasize that Jack Smith has vastly more information and evidence in his possession than is publicly available to them.
Perhaps most notable is the authors' painstaking and comprehensive analysis of the former president's culpability under 18 U.S.C. § 2383 for inciting, setting on foot, assisting, engaging in, or giving aid or comfort to, an insurrection against the authority of the United States.
A person convicted under 18 U.S.C. §2383 "shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."
The authors explain why the former president would not have a First Amendment defense to this charge, were it to be brought against him.
It would be impossible to overstate the enormity of yesterday's seminal decision in Moore v. Harper. Not only is it now the single most important constitutional case for American Democracy since the Nation's Founding almost 250 years ago.
It is also now one of the most important constitutional cases for representative government in America.
Today, it takes its deserved place in the pantheon of great Supreme Court cases that give meaning to the Constitution's genius of a separation of powers --
Given that the former president had no interest whatsoever in resolving his sordid stand-off with the U.S. Government, it can be assumed that he cynically decided this indictment for his preposterous insistence
that he personally owns the national security secrets of the United States and can do with them whatever he pleases (together with his now more likely indictment for his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election) would maximize, if not ensure,
his chances that the Republican Party would again nominate him as its standard bearer in 2024. And there is every reason at this point to believe he is right.
There is not an Attorney General of either party who would not have brought today’s charges against the former president.
He has dared, taunted, provoked, and goaded DOJ to prosecute him from the moment it was learned that he had taken these national security documents.
On any given day for the past 18 months — doubtless up to and including the day before the indictment was returned — the former president could have avoided and prevented this prosecution. He would never have been indicted for taking these documents.
Today, the North Carolina Supreme Court overruled its earlier decision in Moore v. Harper that the state’s constitution forbids excessive partisan gerrymandering. Moore v. Harper, pending in the Supreme Court of the United States, remains ripe for decision by the Supreme Court.
The North Carolina Supreme Court did not disturb its holding in Moore v. Harper with respect to the “independent state legislature” theory.
The court reaffirmed that the state legislature exercises its redistricting authority “subject to the express limitations in [the North Carolina] constitution." To hold otherwise, said the court,
The Divided Community Project of The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, and Mershon Center for International Security Studies recently published "Speaking Out to Strengthen the Guardrails of Democracy."
"Speaking Out to Strengthen the Guardrails of Democracy" is a "how to" guide for shoring up and reinforcing the bulwark of America's faltering democracy.
All of us concerned about American democracy should commit this practical guide to memory and "speak out" in support and defense of our democracy in the weeks and months ahead. This is terrific, moritzlaw.osu.edu. Thank you!
Forced to think about this for the first time today, time will tell whether Mr. Musk, in his calculation to require payment for the privilege of posting content on Twitter, underestimated the utter indispensability to the Twitter platform of the verified accounts
of the "notable" individuals, media, journalists, reporters, organizations, institutions, celebrities, and other meaningful content providers, on the one hand,
and overestimated the willingness of these critical account holders to Twitter's success to pay the hefty fees they now must pay, on the other.