Why care about merit? What harm is there in affirmative action programs that reward the less qualified?
Here's the story of the Martin Luther King Jr/Drew Medical Center (King/Drew) in Los Angeles, which operated from 1972 to 2007.
Or as patients called, it "Killer King." 🧵
The hospital was founded in 1972, in response to black riots of the late 1960s. Elites in LA, like elsewhere in the country, determined that racism was the cause of pathologies in the black community.
Therefore they decided to open up a hospital to serve locals.
Officially, as a public institution, it couldn't be a "black hospital." But most employees and administrators were black, and it was said to belong to the community.
California schools practiced massive affirmative action at the time, and graduates would go work at King/Drew.
Problems appeared right away.
In 1975, the LA Times reported on "horror stories implying neglect and incompetence."
Employees were said to be drunk on the job or on drugs stolen from the hospital pharmacy.
A letter from a nurse in 1977 gave it the moniker of Killer King.
Nothing was done for decades.
It took an LA Times report in 2004 to reveal how things had gotten.
According to one accreditor, the hospital had "problems of orders of magnitude that are substantially greater than almost all other hospitals in this country."
King/Drew spent $20.1 million on malpractice payouts from 1999-2004. Adjusting for the number of patients it saw, this was the worst figure of any hospital in the entire state of California.
Patients would come in with minor medical issues and end up dead.
Locals would run away from ambulances in order not to be brought to Killer King.
Police officers had an understanding that if their colleagues were shot, they would not allow them to be taken there.
Once, a nine year-old daughter of Guatemalan immigrants was hit by a car. She had minor scrapes and a few broken teeth, and her parents thought should would be out before long.
But the girl wouldn't survive Killer King.
First, they gave her enough sedative to sedate a grown man.
They then needed to hook her up to a ventilator, but the settings were wrong.
She was starved of oxygen, and then for unclear reasons a doctor had her breathing tube removed.
Staff failed to monitor her condition.
The girl was soon brain dead and had to be taken off of life support.
The family settled with the hospital for $195,000, and as of 2004 was planning to build an alter at her grave in Guatemala.
In 1992, a sheriff's deputy was taken to the hospital with four gunshot wounds. Joking with nurses when he arrived, he was dead two days later. The surgeon had given him a lethal combination of heart drugs.
In 1994, a woman went to Killer King for a hysterectomy. She got a blood transfusion that had tested positive for AIDS, but nobody had bothered to check.
The hospital tried to discourage a doctor from letting her know, but he did anyway.
Community activists complained that King/Drew didn't have enough funding.
In fact, it got more funding per patient than the other three general hospitals in Los Angeles County.
Where did that money go? Overpaid employees, many of which became famous for their creative disability claims.
"Between April 1994 and April 2004, employees filed 122 chair-fall claims at King/Drew."
The hospital spent $3.2 on claims of employees falling out of chairs alone.
Once, a cashier was getting married. Her supervisor found out that she hadn't been asked to a bridesmaid.
The supervisor got mad, and the cashier said this gave her stress.
Killer King paid the cashier $216,000 on that claim.
A male nurse was tending to a semi-conscious patient having a leg operation. 20 minutes in the surgery, he reported being slugged in the back by a female colleague who knocked him to the floor.
King/Drew was expected to pay him more than $500,000 for back and neck injuries.
It wasn't just the lower level staff. The nueroscience chief made $1 over two years. He appeared to do few surgeries, publish few papers, and got paid for times he wasn't at the hospital.
Once, he reported working 26 hours in a day, after spending 6.5 hours at the hospital.
In five years, Killer King spent nearly $34 million on employee injuries. That was more than any of the University of California medical centers, some of which were two or three times its size.
LA Times in 2004: "Some employees habitually fail to show up, logging weeks, even months, of unexcused absences each year. And those who do come to work often don't do their jobs, causing one consultant in 2002 to remark that they had 'retired in place.'"
"King/Drew pays its ranking doctors lavishly. Some draw twice what their counterparts make at other public hospitals - often for doing less. Eighteen King/Drew physicians earned more than $250,000 in the last fiscal year, including their academic stipends. Harbor-UCLA had nine"
In the hallways of Killer King, employees would sell peanuts and bootleg DVD.
Patients would sit in their hospital beds, being ignored as hospital staff sat out in the hallways talking about parties they'd been to and the movies they'd seen.
Once, a nurse ordered a janitor aide's to mix up IV medication for a critically ill patient.
According to Civil Service records, the janitor aide's job only required him to recognize "a limited number of two- and three-syllable words."
The nurse lost her license.
One resident, Warren Lemons, was fired when he couldn't get licensed in California
Later, he was found barricaded in a room with a deaf-mute patient. Lemons had baby oil and soft restraints
When he was later arrested for killing a man, police found videos of naked male patients
A 28 year-old man died when the nurse who was supposed to be watching him had silenced the alarm on his vital-signs monitor.
She also falsified his medical charts, claiming that he was in stable condition an hour after he had died.
Why was nothing ever fixed? Remember, the hospital was called "Killer King" in 1977, and it lasted 40 more years after that, until 2007. You won't be surprised to learn that community activists denounced those who tried to do anything as racists.
When LA County met to discuss closing the trauma center, Maxine Waters organized a demonstration that included Jesse Jackson, and grabbed the microphone as she took control of the meeting. Politicians were cowed into silence for decades.
One influential activist warned against a "Latino takeover" of the hospital, called the head of the county health department the "grand wizard," and referred to police as pigs.
Over time, the surrounding community became more Hispanic. Many of them illegal immigrants, they were generally unwilling to assert themselves.
Some already expected hospitals to do things like operate on the wrong leg, so they didn't see anything surprising at King/Drew.
Nonetheless, the LA Times won a Pulitzer Prize for reporting on what was happening at Killer King in 2004. Under increasing pressure, the hospital was finally shut down in 2007.
In 2015, it was replaced at the same site by the MLK Community Hospital, a $200 million building.
While still serving the black community, the new hospital appears to have much lower ambitions than King/Drew. As of 2017, it didn't have a trauma center and avoiding hiring specialists or treating the most difficult cases. It focused on basic preventative and primary care.
Having learned nothing, since 2020 California schools have been announcing new DEI initiatives. We'll see what happens after the SCOTUS decision.
King/Drew shows what happens when you bring DEI staff together in one place. The problem is less noticeable when you spread them out
Everywhere you look in the medical system, once you let some people in through AA, you have to lie about everything.
In 2015, blacks were 5% of residents, but 20% of those kicked out of medical school. 2% of whites studying surgery were dismissed, and 12% of blacks.
From 2003-2013, the Medical Board of California reports that blacks were 2.7% of doctors but received 4.4% of complaints, among those whose race we know. Numbers are also bad for other groups that get AA. https://t.co/fi5iUSy3tqlibrary.ca.gov/wp-content/upl…
See here for the Pulitzer Prize winning reporting from the LA Times on Killer King. In 2020, the LA Times apologized for its previously racially insensitive coverage, so we're unlikely to see many reports like this again.
https://t.co/Ih2ftSbi9jpulitzer.org/winners/los-an…
The diversity ideology poisons everything it touches in a vicious cycle.
Incompetent doctors, race baiting politicians intimidating those who know better and protecting failed institutions. Now, a press that has become more openly committed to covering up inconvenient facts.
This is a reminder that, behind the statistics you see on racial realities and the harms of DEI ideology, there are real costs in terms of health, public safety, and ultimately the functioning of our civilization.
Let the memory of Killer King remain as a testament to that.
I’m going to do a series on these, so follow in order to keep up to date. Trust me, there are many more Killer Kings out there in practically all areas of American life.
UPDATE: I just found out that the reputation of Killer King was such that it made its way into a 1991 Ice Cube song.
🎵Woke up in the back of a trey
On my way to MLK
That's the county hospital, jack, ha
Where n*ggas die over a little scratch 🎵
https://t.co/dn5SGXiSEDgenius.com/Ice-cube-alive…
Its reputation for ignoring patients was well known. Next verse, they make Ice Cube fill out forms while coughing up blood.
🎵 Sittin' in the trauma center
In my back is where the bullet entered
"Yo, nurse, I'm gettin' kinda warm"
Bitch still made me fill out the fuckin' form🎵
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you haven't looked into their claims, you are always going to underestimate just how much and how blatantly anti-vaxxers lie.
If you are on the right, I want you to open your mind and realize that no matter what problems you have with the left, Robert F Kennedy is a uniquely sinister figure who should have no role in public life. Here's just one example as to why.
RFK wrote the foreword for a book by an anti-vaxx organization he once led that claimed to list young people dropping dead from the covid vaccine. The 12-year-old boy on the cover hadn't even been vaccinated against covid. He was just a random kid who died for unrelated reasons, anti-vaxxers put him on the cover of a book, and RFK promoted it.
When the family tried to tell them about this, the publisher ignored them.
The AP reports:
When 12-year-old Braden Fahey collapsed during football practice and died, it was just the beginning of his parents’ nightmare.
Deep in their grief a few months later, Gina and Padrig Fahey received news that shocked them to their core: A favorite photo of their beloved son was plastered on the cover of a book that falsely argues COVID-19 vaccines caused a spike of sudden deaths among healthy young people.
The book, called “Cause Unknown,” was co-published by an anti-vaccine group led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President John F. Kennedy’s nephew, who is now running for president. Kennedy wrote the foreword and promoted the book, tweeting that it details data showing “ COVID shots are a crime against humanity.”
The Faheys couldn’t understand how Braden’s face appeared on the book’s cover, or why his name appeared inside it.
Braden never received the vaccine. His death in August 2022 was due to a malformed blood vessel in his brain. No one ever contacted them to ask about their son’s death, or for permission to use the photo. No one asked to confirm the date of his death — which the book misdated by a year. When the Faheys and residents of their town in California tried to contact the publisher and author to get Braden and his picture taken out of the book, no one responded.
They finally took the boy off the cover of the book after it became a story during Kennedy's 2024 run. Kennedy supporters have harassed the boy's parents, maybe because they believe they're lying about the covid vaccine and part of the conspiracy.
12-year-old Branden Fahey isn't the only person they were lying about. They were just taking random people who died and made a book about them. One even died in 2019, before covid vaccines were invented.
The AP found dozens of individuals included in the book died of known causes not related to vaccines, including suicide, choking while intoxicated, overdose and allergic reaction. One person died in 2019.
AP asked Kennedy’s campaign, CHD, Dowd and Skyhorse president Tony Lyons several questions about the book, including why they chose to feature Braden, why they didn’t speak to his family first and what steps they took to fact check.
Kennedy's former organization says that Fahey's obituary didn't list a cause of death, so they just decided to take his picture and put it on the cover of their anti-vaxx book. I'm serious. This is how anti-vaxxers reason. "Maybe your son who died in 2019 actually died because he was vaxxed? Just asking questions! Why are you afraid of debate? What are you hiding?"
In emails, Lyons did not address why Braden specifically was chosen for the cover but defended his inclusion by saying that news stories and his obituary did not mention his cause of death.
Hundreds of deaths are cited in the book, though Lyons said it only attributes nine of them to the vaccine. Lyons said Braden’s death and others are never explicitly attributed to the vaccine, and that the book explores many possible reasons for deaths that have appeared in headlines since 2021.
Still, the book several times refers to its “thesis” that mass administration of COVID-19 vaccines caused a spike in deaths. Braden’s parents said his appearance in the context of the book implies he died of the vaccine, putting his death in a false light.
Anti-vaxxers are very dedicated and put out a lot of material. People see this and assume that there must be something to what they're saying. How can they produce so many books, papers, and podcasts if vaccines are safe? What's wrong with opening up a debate?
You'll never have the time to go through all of their claims. The thing to realize is that these are some of the stupidest and most dishonest people in public life. They've been shunned from mainstream institutions for good reason, and it's a troubling sign that they're now being given political power.
If you think elites are the problem, know that they at least want nothing to do with anti-vaxxers. I consider this a litmus test. The degree to which institutions reject these people can be taken as a direct measure of how well they're functioning.
Remember that RFK personally lobbied against vaccines in Samoa, where over 80 children died due to lowering rates.
Oh yeah, and here's the story about how he drove his wife to suicide after she found a notebook of all the women he cheated with.
NYT on one of the first things Kamala Harris did after becoming vice president:
Paging through intelligence reports just weeks after she was sworn in as vice president, Kamala Harris was struck by the way two female foreign leaders were described. The reports used adjectives that, in her view, were rarely used to describe male leaders.
Ms. Harris, the first woman to hold her office, ordered up a review that scrutinized multiple years of briefing reports from various intelligence agencies, looking for possible gender bias.
The study found some questionable word choices but no widespread pattern, according to a senior intelligence official, one of five who requested anonymity to discuss the review. (None would disclose the words flagged by Ms. Harris because the reports were classified.)
Still, the exercise had an impact: Intelligence officials added a new training class for analysts on how to judge and assess female foreign leaders, according to another official.
Remember all the race craziness during covid? Guess who was the driving force behind it in the administration:
During the pandemic, she repeatedly asked her vice-presidential staff for demographic breakdowns on Covid vaccination recipients and pressed the administration’s health officials to address gaps, according to two former administration officials.
She pushed the federal bureaucracy to incorporate concerns about equity into routine business — so much so that her advisers seldom briefed her on domestic policies without having prepared a ready answer about their impact on women, Black and Hispanic people and other racial minorities.
When Trump says that these are stupid, unserious people, stories like this are what make his charges sound credible.
She doesn’t talk about it during the campaign. But this is where her heart is at. nytimes.com/2024/10/25/us/…
Her staff knew that DEI was her obsession. This ended up influencing everything about how they did their jobs. They knew that Kamala would have DEI-related questions on every issue and prepared with that in mind.
She pushed the federal bureaucracy to incorporate concerns about equity into routine business — so much so that her advisers seldom briefed her on domestic policies without having prepared a ready answer about their impact on women, Black and Hispanic people and other racial minorities.
“She was always interested in race and gender,” said one former aide who requested anonymity because of lack of authorization to speak publicly. “We all knew it was really important to her, so we would proactively add that to her briefings. She didn’t have to ask for it.”
The human capital problem on the right is bad and getting worse. Eating pets and imaginary whistleblowers today. What's next? Diagnosing it is easy. Finding solutions is hard.
My theory of our politics would suggest it's hopeless. There are lots of stupid people out there, and they used to be kept out by gatekeepers and distributed across the parties. Now they're increasingly in one party, and have the internet. A simple story of supply and demand.
But the electoral college makes it much worse.
For most of US history, the electoral college hasn't mattered. But two things have changed since 2000 that have made the electoral college go from an afterthought to vitally important to presidential politics.
To celebrate, I've written an article on why you should not support labor unions.
They are anti-meritocratic cartels that achieve gains by harming the rest of society. If you are concerned with poverty, there are better ways to help. richardhanania.com/p/unions-are-n…
We can have reasonable debates about the size of government or how much it should distribute wealth. But the way to help the working class is not to favor one group of people and let them take from everyone else, lower economic efficiency, and harm consumers and other workers.
The story of American ports. They are the least efficient in the world because unions fight technological innovation. Labor bosses actively benefit from making everything function worse.
How to understand the RFK phenomenon? I explain Dale Gribble voters. The ultra paranoid have always been around, but before they were divided between the parties.
Top two podcasts in the country are Rogan and Tucker. They're considered on the opposite sides of the political spectrum, but both are RFK fans. Other alt media personalities like Alex Jones and Bret Weinstein are also part of this group. It's not right/left, but something diff.
What binds them isn't ideology as traditionally understood, but paranoia and a belief that the world is run by shadowy forces. A "they" who are keeping the truth from you. Gribbles love talking about UFOs, ancient technology, Atlantis, etc and believe they have hidden knowledge.
The selection of JD Vance can be seen as a triumph for the Tech Right. I explain where they came from and what makes them different from others in the GOP. They're socially liberal, anti-egalitarian, and ultimately for dynamism and progress. 🧵 richardhanania.com/p/understandin…
Ironically, there is a group of leftists who saw this coming. They came up with the acronym TESCREAL, which is so ugly that it's actually catchy. The leftists paying the most attention knew that tech elites were different from other elites in academia and journalism.
If you believe in technology and progress, it's going to put you in conflict with the ruling class if it doesn't believe in those things. In most societies that may be religious authorities. In the modern West, it is wokes, driven by an egalitarian vision that discounts progress