The last week on Twitter has been really an amazing string of WTF, even by the impressive standards of Elon. It's really funny when you put all the pieces together.
it's important to start at the beginning. Twitter's pretty broke.
Twitter got into this position largely by deciding that getting people to subscribe to Twitter Blue was the future, and would be enough to make Twitter less dependant on Advertising. Remember when they made the hard switch to get rid of old legacy checkmarks? No one converted.
Blue checkmarks were viewed so terribly that Elon Musk forced them on certain selected celebrities -- many of whom then felt obligated to stress to their followers that no, they would not pay for this garbage website.
But this shouldn't be a surprise as Twitter was basically treading water before Elon acquired it -- and immediately saddled the company with $13 billion dollars of debt, which require constant debt servicing (you know, interest payments).
(As an aside, congratulations to the banks who loaned Elon money. You figured out a way to make Twitter profitable, at least for you! Good for you!)
A huge part of the problem is that advertising has declined massively. You've probably noticed that your ads are now less likely to be McDonald's and Acura and more likely to be Cheech & Chong's gummies and various level crap.
Which made it all the more surprising when last week a bunch of blue checkmarked Tweeters reported getting informed they were getting big payouts from Twitter, in the $20K range.
When pressed upon it, Elon stressed that the payouts were based on ads that were served in replies to their threads to other verified members, stressing that content to free users was easy to manipulate.
I doubt Elon's advertisers are paying based on just subscriber views.
This is also funny because a core promise of Twitter Blue is that you won't see very many ads! So Twitter Blue went from the feature that would make ads unnecessary to one where Blue users MUST be shown ads in order to succeed!
Also, if you think this sounds like a pyramid scheme or an MLM... yeah, kinda does! It's a transparent attempt to goose blue subscriptions with the promise that you, too, could be getting $25K checks instead of being one of the greater fools shelling out $8/month.
Over on Bluesky, @ParkerMolloy noted that one certain blue check mark user with 1.8M users had not gotten a check -- and wasn't happy about it. Here are some screenshots she grabbed.
Despite being an unqualified garbage person, the esteemed Mr. Turd2 is an endless source of amusement to me, given that he constantly complains about being treated unfairly by Elon's twitter DESPITE BEING ARTIFICIALLY ALGORITHMICALLY BOOSTED.
Another person in Catturd's circle of MAGA doofuses did a little research and discovered that, no, it wasn't a systematic thing, just checks sent out to a handful of handpicked posters -- mysteriously, posters that interact with Elon a lot.
As @TaylorLorenz reports, they describe this picking of winners and losers as a 'human review'.
As Taylor reports, people who have worked at Twitter in the past and know the numbers at play know that this is all a PR stunt.
So who did Elon handpick for this program? Well, a high profile sex trafficker for starters.
Media Matters (@mmfa) did a pretty good roundup. Surprise, it's all of the right-wing dumbosphere that specialize in racism and homophobia/transphobia that Elon likes to interact with on a regular basis!
The message is clear. If you want to make money from Twitter, be a right-wing influencer who regularly takes a shit on marginalized minorities.
And now, Elon has announced he plans to double these payouts. But as you keep these promises in mind, remember.... Twitter doesn't have any money, and has no interesting new revenue pipelines coming.
All of this feels very much like a publicity stunt to try to keep their key influencers from leaving. But why would they feel the need to do that? Gee, that's a real puzzle.
/thread
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“And every four years, we will have suburban housewives in Pennsylvania choose a new president.”
“Just Pennsylvania, sir?”
“And Wisconsin and Michigan. And maybe Arizona, as a treat.”
“No one else can vote, sir?”
“They can vote but it won’t matter.”
God damn I hope this stupid shitpost doesn’t convince a single person not to vote. The election’s going to be scary close and there’s still a lot of important stuff happening down ballot even if you’re in a deep blue or deep red state.
(cont)
"And why would it work this way, sir?"
"Because of my bold new idea, the Electoral College, an obviously superior way to run elections."
"Will we use something like the Electoral College for other elections, like Senators or Governors?"
While it’s not just you, there is a sizable number of players who spend huge amounts of time in character creation. Some will spend more than an hour there.
Also, in a dialogue-heavy game with a lot of NPCs like a DA or a BG3, you’ll need a wide wealth of options to create a world of options to make your NPCs not feel like pod people copies of each other, so the work is not just about appeasing that portion of the audience.
That said, another large percentage will just slam the default or preset options (especially in slider-heavy CC screens where finding a good look is almost an art). Having good presets is CRUCIAL for those players who just want to get into the game.
I've been thinking about writing this thread for a long time, because I think most people - including a lot of game devs, especially more junior ones - don't understand something important about the AAA games industry.
Let's talk about home run swings.
(thred)
When most devs think of jobs, they think of... well, jobs. Jobs are the important thing to us. Execs firing people is bad because devs are good and jobs are important. We like it when talented people can pay their rent and feed their family. So on and so on.
(Before I go on my 'how corps think' rant, I should stress jobs are good, devs are my favorite people, layoffs are terrible, and we should have unions.
A lot of people have taken pot shots at this but I want to go into a little more in-depth, because I think it's important to understand what people like Mira just do not get. Let's talk about writing, esp. game writing.
By which I mean, everyone capable of putting words into a sentence thinks they have what it takes to be a writer. And the people making AI seem to have the same mindset.
(Everyone thinks they can be a game designer, too, but that's a tangent)
2/x
But I worked at BioWare. Before I worked at BioWare, I thought that I was a pretty decent writer. I can write fun dialogue. I sometimes can drop a banger of a tweetthread.
At BioWare, though, it was clear that I (a systems designer) was a rank amateur by comparison.
3/
Greetings, Teslamaniac! Today is the delivery day for your new obsession, the CYBERTRUCK! As we finish final preparation of your new CYBERTRUCK, here are some hints and tricks to help you really live the dream of being a true CYBERTRUCK owner!
(long thread)
First, please don't accelerate the CYBERTRUCK, as you may not be able to stop once you do. wired.com/story/cybertru…
If you take the CYBERTRUCK to the car wash, please note that this may void your warrantee. Please ignore the button marked 'car wash mode'. futurism.com/cybertruck-bri…
A lot of game devs are dunking on this, but if you're not a game dev it's probably not actually obvious why. So I thought I'd take a moment to answer a little more thoughtfully in hopes of giving gamers a little more insight on what we do.
Let's just start with the obvious: art directors all wish this guy was correct. And some art directors stick to their guns and either have no cues, or cues that only appear if you enter 'scan mode' or turn on 'spidey sense' or something. What in this screenshot is interactable?
But one thing we do a lot is focus group testing, where we watch players play our games. Nothing like standing behind glass watching someone take 45 minutes to try to open a door that you think is pretty obvious.