Settled comfortably in our penchant for English, it is easy to miss the essential role language plays in creating our world.
"The design principles of a civilization" become simple enough to understand, but the "saṃskāra of a saṃskṛti" sound obscure, even old-fashioned.
A civilizationist can speculate on "civilizations being similar to organisms,"
but to speak of the civilization that is Bhārata possessing a consciousness that is Dharma- this acquires nationalist/ fundamentalist/ communal colors.
And yet when the truth of a civilization is expressed in its own words, honest minds can find a moment of clarity, one that fundamentally recalibrates the inner mindmap.
Ṛta, Kṛta, Dhṛta, Bhṛta, Ghṛta - suddenly become clear.
"Civilizations are distinct from primitive cultures, exercise greater control of the environment," and are characterized by agriculture, animal domestication, monumental architecture and complex political institutions.
In sharp contrast is the definition by Prof. Yasuda Yoshinory-
"Civilization begins to appear when a workable system for living, that is a proper relationship between man and nature, is established in accord with the features of a given region."
These throw into relief 2 crucial questions:
1. What, if any, is the difference between civilization and culture?
2. Does the "civilized" in civilization imply a greater control of nature, or an increased harmony with it?
Study into such matters reveals 2 further queries:
We are all familiar with the kathā of how Ratnākara was given the mantra of Rāma's name by Ṛṣi Nārada, which transformed him into the Ādi Kavi Ṛṣi Vālmīki.
Such is the transformative power of Rāmāyaṇa, whose tej still lights up our path.
We recently had the soubhāgya to offer a session on Śrīmad Vālmīki's Rāmāyaṇa in collaboration with @6amiji. Śrī Rāma's persona presents such an amalgam of dharma and karma, that the ideal itself elevates the cetanā.
Here are some thoughts our learners shared post the course.
"My biggest learning is that Rāma is the epitome of 'SthithaPragyanta'. He and his morality or actions are not bound by the situation. No matter the hardships, he faced them all with the same Dharmic lens and composure. That is the true 'Maryada Purushottam' for me "
-Kartick
Bauddhika Ātmanirbharatā, with reference to Science and Technology.
An initiative by the CoE-IKS @IITKgp and @ugc_india
to dispel the misleading belief about India's knowledge being divorced from the observational sciences.
It will also communicate and explain why India is fast becoming ātmanirbhara in civil, urban, peace and war technologies.
The FDP 2022 will support and strengthen the Government's resolve to create ātmanirbhara Bhārata.
It presents fifty-six sessions spread over fourteen viṣayas (themes) across consecutive fourteen days.
The NEP 2020 envisions an educational system patterned on the lines of a “scientific temper and evidence-based thinking to a sense of aesthetics and arts”.