Ibram X. Kendi Profile picture
Jul 18 18 tweets 7 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Lincoln spent the first two years of his presidency plotting to deport all Black people out of the U.S. Political support for "colonization" evaporated #OTD when the all-Black 54th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment fought the Second Battle of Fort Wagner near Charleston. A 🧵 1/ Image
Before the Civil War, most *anti-slavery* White Americans hardly supported the abolitionist movement for immediate emancipation. Most were like Lincoln, supporting the colonization movement that advocated for gradual emancipation and shipping out emancipated Black people. 2/ Image
Racist White northerners feared freed Black people heading north, invading White communities and becoming “roaming, vicious vagabonds,” as Chicago Tribune put it on 1861. When the Civil War came, antiracist talk of emancipation invariably led to racist talk of colonization. 3/ Image
So, in 1862, Republican Congressmen made sure to set aside $600,000 (about $18 million today) to deport African Americans from the United States. Colonization designs were also behind the Lincoln administration’s opening up diplomatic relations with Haiti and Liberia in 1862. 4/ Image
Most African Americans opposed colonization (with the exception of those who believed U.S. racism was permanent, or who developed an early Pan-Africanism, or who admired revolutionary Haiti, or who wanted to Christianize “backward” Africans). 5/ Image
With African Americans refusing to depart the nation of their birth, Lincoln welcomed five Black men to the President’s House on August 14, 1862, to press his case. Lincoln blamed the presence of Black people for the war, saying all would be well if Black people left. 6/ Image
Black people refusing to leave the U.S. would be “extremely selfish,” Lincoln said.

The meeting showed Lincoln’s “contempt for Negroes,” Frederick Douglass said. It was Black people's "being free" that made "their presence here intolerable," William Lloyd Garrison said. 7/ Image
In his Message to Congress on December 1, 1862, Lincoln offered Confederates a plan for gradual, compensated emancipation and colonization if they laid down their arms. Confederates refused. 8/ Image
So Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863 "as a fit and necessary war measure," authorizing Black people to join the Union Army. Then, MA Gov. John Andrew, John Brown's lawyer after the raid, ordered the 54th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment to be created. 9/ Image
News of the 54th's creation spread quickly, and Black men from across the U.S. flocked to join. Most were from northern states, although some had escaped from southern slavery, or were born in Canada and the Caribbean. The regiment was led by White officers. 10/ Image
In July, after the victories at Gettysburg and Vicksburg, the Union decided to take Fort Wagner in Charleston Harbor. Access to the harbor was an essential step in retaking the citadel of the enslavers: Charleston, SC. 11/ Image
Fighting for the first time alongside White soldiers, the 54th and its White commander Robert Gould Shaw led the Union forces in the charge. The 54th fought valiantly as depicted in the film, Glory, but couldn't take the fort. Nearly half were killed, captured, or wounded. 12/ Image
The stories of this battle—of Black soldiers fearlessly sprinting through a hail of bullets and bombs toward “maddened” Confederates, of the U.S. flag being picked up when its bearer fell—shot through the North and captivated supporters of the Union. 13/ Image
Catholic publicist Orestes A. Brownson advised Lincoln on colonization. After Fort Wagner, he wrote the “negro, having shed his blood in defence of the country, has the right to regard it as his country. . deportation or forced colonization is henceforth out of the question." 14/ Image
Lincoln had to admit that colonization had failed, while Chicago Tribune wrote about “The End of Colonization.” But as Black Americans know today, chants of "go back to Africa" did not end in 1863. Racism did not end. 15/ Image
What didn't end was the racist idea that Black people had to prove they were Americans. Or even the historical ignorance: Black people shed their blood in every war since the founding of the U.S., and on mercilessly violent plantations accumulating the wealth of the U.S. 16/ Image
This has always been the cruel paradox of Black military service going all the way back to Second Battle on Fort Wagner led by the 54th on this day in 1863. The notion that Black people had to die for the United States to live in the United States. 17/17 Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ibram X. Kendi

Ibram X. Kendi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ibramxk

Jul 12
To claim a White nationalist is “not racist,” to claim that describing a White nationalist as “racist” is a matter of “opinion,” is indicative of a larger problem: People believe there's no scientific or verifiable definition of “racist” or “racism.” A🧵1/
People too often define "racist" and "racism" in a way that allows them to opine they are "not racist," racism against people of color is a myth, and White people are the primary victims of racism. They dismiss definitions based on the material and historic reality of racism. 2/
The very people dismissing verifiable definitions of racism are also striving to delegitimize and discredit experts in racism. The very people who say climate scientists are political and just sharing their opinions are saying the same thing about scholars who study racism. 3/
Read 5 tweets
Jul 5
Cecil Rhodes was born #OTD in 1853. Rhodes, a British imperialist whose brutal rule killed and dispossessed millions in southern Africa, inspired White American supremacists, such as the Charleston church shooter and the propagator of “anti-racist is code for anti-White.” A 🧵1/
Rhodes was born on July 5, 1853 in Hertfordshire, England. From 1890 to 1896, he was the Prime Minister of England's Cape Colony, what is now South Africa. He also organized and owned De Beers Consolidated Mines, which had a market share of 90% of the world’s diamonds by 1891. 2/
Rhodes’s company routinely subjected African miners to exploitative and fatal working conditions, practices that aligned with Rhodes's belief that "nine-tenths of [Africans] will have to spend their lives in daily labour... the sooner that is brought home to them, the better." 3/
Read 10 tweets
Jun 30
The term "race conscious," as a descriptor for affirmative action, is as flawed as the term "race neutral" for the other admission metrics, as @DrUJayakumar and I explain @TheAtlantic. "Race conscious" reinforces the "race neutral" and "colorblind" frame.
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Affirmative-action policies are antiracist because they reduce racial inequities, while many of the other admissions metrics, like legacies, test scores, and boosts for relatives of employees and donors, are racist because they maintain racial inequities.
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Anti-affirmative action litigants and judges do not want to talk about the outcomes of their actions. Because it becomes obvious they banned affirmative action because it did not benefit White and wealthy students as much as the other admission metrics.
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Read 4 tweets
Jun 29
In banning affirmative action, the Supreme Court has *not* banned using race in college admissions. "Race neutral" is a legal fantasy, the latest to conserve racism. As Uma Jayakumar and I write @TheAtlantic, “race neutral” is the new “separate but equal.”
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
The idea of "race neutral" admission metrics, like test scores, is a fantasy, like the Court doctrine that segregated schools were “separate but equal.” We show how several admission metrics disadvantage Black, Latinx, Native, and many Asian students.
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
The Court effectively outlawed affirmative action, which closes racial inequities in admissions, leaving the metrics that have long led to racial inequities in college admissions. The result: a normality of racial inequity. Sanctioned by the Court. Again.
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Read 6 tweets
Jun 28
This #PrideMonth, it is important to recognize non-binary and gender nonconforming people have been here from the beginning of the U.S. Here is a thread on one of the most influential such persons in early America. An abolitionist minister known as The Public Universal Friend. 1/
The Friend was a Christian preacher who lived from 1752 to 1819. Assigned female at birth and given the name Jemima Wilkinson, later in life this person eschewed gendered pronouns, preferring to be addressed as "the Friend." 2/
The Friend was born into a big White family of Rhode Island Quakers, the eighth of twelve children. In October 1776, they became ill with "Columbus fever," likely typhus. Captured British soldiers on a Navy vessel docked in Providence had brought the disease to the area. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Jun 25
With elections looming, in some US states it is harder to vote than it was a decade ago, particularly for people of color. Because #OTD 10 years ago in Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court gutted the 1965 Voting Rights Act, leading to a flood of voter suppression. A🧵1/
The 1965 Voting Rights Act (VRA) prevented racist voter suppression policies through "federal preclearance." The VRA required that districts with long histories of electoral racism submit any proposed changes to their voting procedures to the federal government for approval. 2/
Instead of voters of color harmed by new voting policies having to sue, lawmakers had to prove that new voting policies would not harm voters. And because the VRA had been effective for decades in stopping voter suppression, officials in Shelby County, Alabama, sued in 2011. 3/
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(