For people trying to write about Gary Shapley w/o first reading all the ways his own testimony discredits him, first note how his behavior looks when you consider his hesitation to turn over emails in the wake of two leaks.
Then consider that Shapley himself says he and X were keeping a double set of records, in part to ensure X could testify at trial. Consider all the signs that this investigation was tainted by -- among other things -- TRUMP'S improper influence.
What Gary Shapley's testimony the last time showed is that DOJ/FBI/IRS hadn't done the most basic things to test the integrity of the laptop obtained from Mac Isaac 10 months after they received it, AFTER IRS had used it to obtain further warrants.
Think about that: The IRS got a laptop purportedly handed over directly from the son of the then former VP, and they didn't do the most basic things (!!!!!) to validate the data ON IT for 10 months.
And ... then they discovered Rudy had a tie to it.
This is, as I noted, what frother right wingers accuse the FBI of doing with Carter Page, but in fact occurred.
Gary Shapley records the AUSA in this case saying it wasn't a priority to validate that Mac Isaac had not tampered with the laptop.
Check it out--it's in his notes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Shapley claims he's being retaliatd against. Says his supervisors haven't spoken to him since June 1, when he was blabbing his mouth to the press, which is not protected.
Since we know Trump is facing obstruction charges, I recommend that journos who haven't covered the 100s of these already charged to read the Findings of Fact Republican appointed judge Royce Lamberth wrote up for a similar organizer-inciter defendant.
This is what obstruction looks like, as applied to January 6, in real life.
This will show you how incitement gets treated as part of obstruction. It will show you what a judge aiming to protect this verdict in advance of Circuit decision on "corrupt purpose" does.
He tells a SLIGHTLY different story about predication (tho it still rests on the escort ring that looked like they were trying to steal Hunter's ID plus media reporting). But it takes 4 months getting started after which DE is investigating.
Whistleblower X doesn't hide this time what he tried to before Ways and Means -- they were getting approval for attorney-client request.
Given his admission he saw stuff "on Twitter" from the laptop this is problematic.
Two things I'm learning from a bunch of shitholes who haven't spent last 2 years covering the Jan6 investigation and some really hard working people who did.
1) No one knows that DOJ got a warrant to seize Rudy's phones on Lisa Monaco's first day on the job.
That was not a warrant for Jan6.
But if DOJ ever got probable cause ot get that content, it would have been privilege reviewed and turned over without you knowing.
2) The January 6 Committee, several members of which are obviously sources for that WaPo story explicitly sourced to Congressional sources?
They created 6 months of unnecessary delay and did real damage to Proud Boys case.
Former Rand and Ron Paul staffer may get the dubious honor of being the first Trump pardon recipient sent to prison -- appropriately, for lying to hide a donation from Russia.
Actually, it looks like he's already in Beaumont prison in TX.
So he has, indeed, beat Steve Bannon and Philip Esformes to prison.
Bannon's appeal of his 4 month conviction for contempt is still pending, very slowly, before the DC Circuit. (It is briefed, waiting for oral argument.)