How did Aleppo, which stands on a minor river in the middle of a vast plain, come to be the greatest metropolis in Syria?
Simply by standing dead center on the overland portion of the trade route connecting the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean. Thread.
There were three main routes to the Mediterranean from the Indian Ocean in antiquity:
-Through the Red Sea then overland to the Nile
-Through the Persian Gulf, up the Euphrates, then overland to the Orontes near Antioch
-Overland from southern Arabia
Before the discovery of the monsoon trade routes in the Hellenistic era, there was not a large volume of sea trade between India and the Near East. The voyage was long and arduous, having to follow the desolate, waterless Makran coast in southern Iran and Pakistan.
The most valuable product of the Indian Ocean rim was incense—the great incense-producing regions were in southern Arabia and East Africa, favoring the southern routes. And when the India trade did take off, Ptolemaic Egypt was best poised to exploit it.
https://t.co/s0KrgoBHfP https://t.co/copJ4q5ibR
There was still important trade in the Persian Gulf. It's where Tyrian purple dye was first produced from murex shells, and what Indian goods did reach the Near East by sea mostly came through the Gulf—Darius the Great even hired Phoenician crews for this.
https://t.co/UwHifwvpwQ
Goods from overseas and Iraq were carried up the Euphrates by barge and transported overland through Syria, intersecting with the incense routes from the south—it is from farthest antiquity that Syrians maintained a reputation for love of luxury.
Aleppo stands exactly midway between the Euphrates and Antioch. Although the city was inhabited since at least the early Bronze Age—the citadel stands on a tell, an ancient mound formed by continuous inhabitation—it remained fairly small through antiquity.
https://t.co/dQFbx1YNLY https://t.co/sOlz5NWRni
Nevertheless, Aleppo had great potential for growth. It is situated between the vast and productive plains of Idlib to the south and Azaz to the north, allowing it to sustain a growing population as the trade with Antioch steadily increased.
Antioch was the true metropolis of Syria in antiquity, and the third greatest city of the Roman Empire. The Orontes only navigable becomes navigable around the city, so it served as the great emporium of the East, exporting Syrian goods across the Mediterranean.
This route was just over 100 miles by land—only slightly longer than the route from Suez to the Nile by Cairo, and considerably shorter than the distance from Berenike to the Nile. And it did not suffer the strong northerly winds which made the Red Sea route fairly slow.
So when the seat of the Islamic caliphate moved from Damascus to Baghdad under the Abbasids, the Syrian route was primed to explode. The quays of Basra filled up with merchandise from China and India, much of which passed through Aleppo.
The city’s natural defensibility combined with its trade wealth made it a prime location for control of northern Syria, and it soon surpassed Antioch. In the 10th century it became the center of the Hamdanid dynasty, Byzantium’s last great Arab adversary.
https://t.co/f8ydOmNOmS
The city continued to play an enormous role in regional politics, forming a pole with Damascus for control of Syria and with Mosul for control of the northern Syrian-Mesopotamian plains.
By the Ottomans’ zenith in the 16th century it was the third-largest city in the empire, after Constantinople and Cairo—just as Antioch had been the third in the Roman Empire after Rome and Alexandria. And it remains the largest city in Syria today.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Florence was not favored by geography to become a major city—tucked inland in a not especially fertile area, and located on a non-navigable stretch of river. But once she began growing, these factors contributed to making her a pioneer in international commerce.
The industry that first made Florence rich was textiles. Tuscany as a whole had lots of resources that fed the industry: dyes like woad, saffron, and madder grew in the nearby hills, and alum, a fixative for dyes, was mined near the coast.
Many other Tuscan towns became famous for their cloth industries as a result of this, and some, like Lucca, developed some of the earliest silk industries in Western Europe—these later served as an initial source of skilled labor for Florence.
Europeans who traveled east with the Crusades were astonished by the luxury and industry of the Orient. But within just a few centuries—long before the great monarchies' colonial ventures—Europe dominated those industries and was exporting those same products to the Levant. 🧵
Silk was the quintessential luxury product from the East. Italian towns like Lucca began weaving silk cloth imported from the Levant in the 12th century, and by 1400 were exporting their finished products across Europe and back to the Eastern Mediterranean.
Italy and Spain also came to dominate raw silk production. They already had some silkworm breeders by the time of the Crusades, but production ramped up with the introduction of Chinese mulberry varieties, and by 1500 they produced the majority of raw silk in the Mediterranean.
Ottoman borders in the 15th century looked a lot like Byzantium during its ascent: for similar geographic reasons they faced an ongoing state of war along their eastern frontier. But once they turned their full attention to the problem, they solved it much more dramatically.🧵
Anatolia was the Ottomans’ base of power, where they welded together the Turkic beyliks that formed in the wake of Byzantine retreat. This was a gradual process, and by the 15th c. several retained varying degrees of independence.
One of these was the Karamanids in southern Anatolia, who often tried to expand this during periods of Ottoman weakness or disunity. One of these attempts came in 1444, when the so-called Crusade of Varna was attacking their Balkan possessions.
Quotes are from a superb pair of essays by @Scholars_Stage, Luttwak's book on Byzantium gives a similar misreading of their strategic culture (but cast in a positive light). In truth, the Byzantines were very eager to fight, diplomacy and bribes were only used as stop-gaps when occupied on another front, and the caution advised by their military manuals was tactical and operational—not strategic.
@Scholars_Stage On the first point, it was a matter of simple geography. They campaigned aggressively whenever threatened, but their two primary theaters were separated by an enormous distance.
The caution urged on frontier commanders by the manuals (e.g. On Skirmishing) has to be interpreted in light of the larger strategic picture. Prematurely forcing a battle risked leaving all of Anatolia exposed before the imperial army could mobilize.
When the Seljuks arrived in the Middle East, they played a very similar role to the Franks in Dark Age Europe: protectors of an enfeebled religious authority and the enforcers of orthodoxy.🧵
The Franks who expanded into Gaul in the 6th century were unique among the barbarian kingdoms of Western Europe. Their king Clovis converted to Nicene Christianity, aligning himself with the surviving elite of the post-Roman West.
This stood in contrast to the Visigoths of Spain, Burgundians of southeast Gaul, Ostrogoths of Italy, and Vandals of North Africa, all of whom practiced Arianism and remained aloof of their subject populations.
It took a decade for a 17th-century financial crisis to travel from Spain to China.
The Spanish Crown suffered a pair of fiscal disasters in 1627-28 which eventually forced it to cut silver exports to the Far East, hammering a Ming China already teetering on the precipice.
The flood of New World silver into Asian markets in the 1500s crushed the value of metal currency, but also supercharged trade as new markets were opened for exports. The effect was the same from Syria to China.