How did Aleppo, which stands on a minor river in the middle of a vast plain, come to be the greatest metropolis in Syria?
Simply by standing dead center on the overland portion of the trade route connecting the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean. Thread.
There were three main routes to the Mediterranean from the Indian Ocean in antiquity:
-Through the Red Sea then overland to the Nile
-Through the Persian Gulf, up the Euphrates, then overland to the Orontes near Antioch
-Overland from southern Arabia
Before the discovery of the monsoon trade routes in the Hellenistic era, there was not a large volume of sea trade between India and the Near East. The voyage was long and arduous, having to follow the desolate, waterless Makran coast in southern Iran and Pakistan.
The most valuable product of the Indian Ocean rim was incense—the great incense-producing regions were in southern Arabia and East Africa, favoring the southern routes. And when the India trade did take off, Ptolemaic Egypt was best poised to exploit it.
https://t.co/s0KrgoBHfP https://t.co/copJ4q5ibR
There was still important trade in the Persian Gulf. It's where Tyrian purple dye was first produced from murex shells, and what Indian goods did reach the Near East by sea mostly came through the Gulf—Darius the Great even hired Phoenician crews for this.
https://t.co/UwHifwvpwQ
Goods from overseas and Iraq were carried up the Euphrates by barge and transported overland through Syria, intersecting with the incense routes from the south—it is from farthest antiquity that Syrians maintained a reputation for love of luxury.
Aleppo stands exactly midway between the Euphrates and Antioch. Although the city was inhabited since at least the early Bronze Age—the citadel stands on a tell, an ancient mound formed by continuous inhabitation—it remained fairly small through antiquity.
https://t.co/dQFbx1YNLY https://t.co/sOlz5NWRni
Nevertheless, Aleppo had great potential for growth. It is situated between the vast and productive plains of Idlib to the south and Azaz to the north, allowing it to sustain a growing population as the trade with Antioch steadily increased.
Antioch was the true metropolis of Syria in antiquity, and the third greatest city of the Roman Empire. The Orontes only navigable becomes navigable around the city, so it served as the great emporium of the East, exporting Syrian goods across the Mediterranean.
This route was just over 100 miles by land—only slightly longer than the route from Suez to the Nile by Cairo, and considerably shorter than the distance from Berenike to the Nile. And it did not suffer the strong northerly winds which made the Red Sea route fairly slow.
So when the seat of the Islamic caliphate moved from Damascus to Baghdad under the Abbasids, the Syrian route was primed to explode. The quays of Basra filled up with merchandise from China and India, much of which passed through Aleppo.
The city’s natural defensibility combined with its trade wealth made it a prime location for control of northern Syria, and it soon surpassed Antioch. In the 10th century it became the center of the Hamdanid dynasty, Byzantium’s last great Arab adversary.
https://t.co/f8ydOmNOmS
The city continued to play an enormous role in regional politics, forming a pole with Damascus for control of Syria and with Mosul for control of the northern Syrian-Mesopotamian plains.
By the Ottomans’ zenith in the 16th century it was the third-largest city in the empire, after Constantinople and Cairo—just as Antioch had been the third in the Roman Empire after Rome and Alexandria. And it remains the largest city in Syria today.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Crusades are sometimes presented as a flash in the pan, a meteoric burst of conquests that were bound to crumble eventually. But they could have just as easily endured centuries longer than they did.
Thread on the failed Crusade against Damascus. https://t.co/JZYbRQIvtF
The Second Crusade was launched in response to the first great crisis that Outremer faced: the fall of Edessa to the powerful warlord Zengi. This brought the loss of much of their inland territories east of the defensible coastal ranges and the Jordan.
There was great danger that Zengi’s united realm of northern Syria and Mesopotamia would sweep the remnants into the sea, so in 1147 Louis VII of France and Conrad III of Germany set out at the head of mighty armies to oppose him.
Most of the adventures in the Arabian Nights take place around the Indian Ocean, stories with Persian or Indian origins. But at least one of them comes from Byzantine tales of the exotic. Thread. https://t.co/32qnrzdCOK https://t.co/KeoZXWzYnftwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
In the 4th century, an Egyptian Greek visited the island of Taprobane (usually identified as Sri Lanka, based on Ptolemy’s description). He reported that magnetic rocks on the island prevented ships made with iron nails from departing. https://t.co/WsdwqjNOsAtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
This story was embellished over the ages. In the 6thcentury, Procopius related a legend circulating in his time that the entire Indian Ocean was filled with magnetic rocks that shipwrecked vessels with iron—this was said to explain why shipwrights there did not use nails.
On this date in 1187 Saladin destroyed the Crusader army at Hattin, killing or capturing all but a few hundred of more than 20,000 men.
Perhaps history’s most one-sided victory, won by a middling tactician with a decidedly mixed record against the Franks. How did he do it? https://t.co/JZYbRQHXE7
The campaign of 1187 was Saladin’s fifth major invasion of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. He had greatly outnumbered the Crusaders on each previous occasion, but these had resulted in one major defeat, a minor victory, and two stalemates.
There was a downside to Saladin’s large, cavalry-heavy armies: they required immense logistical support.
He could sustain them indefinitely while mustering in the Hauran or Golan Heights, but as soon as he crossed the Jordan the clock started ticking.
https://t.co/h7JIEVEWuK
The Frankish knights of Outremer survived more than four decades in a period of acute crisis, during which they were desperately outnumbered by an increasingly united foe.
How did they do it?
After reaching their territorial peak in the 1130s, the Crusader states were put on their back foot. Upper Mesopotamia and most of inland Syria were being united under a single dynasty, while the relatively few Frankish knights received little reinforcement from the West.
The first sign of trouble was when Zengi, the atabeg of Mosul, extended his rule over Aleppo. This brought large numbers of fighting men under his control and extended his borders up to Outremer itself. He soon began rolling up Antioch’s inland possessions.
Trade expeditions usually departed Basra’s port of al-Ubullah in September or October, when the seas were still calm. Sailing down the Shatt al-Arab, they entered the Gulf.
https://t.co/kUh2thwBNq
Larger ships proceeded directly down the coast. But because of difficulties navigating the currents in the Shatt al-Arab, goods were often loaded onto smaller boats for the voyage to Siraf on the desolate Persian coast, where they were transferred to larger ocean-going vessels.
The most common objection I got to this thread was that Machiavelli was primarily a political philosopher who observed the broad patterns in human affairs.
This is where his friend Guicciardini serves as a useful antidote. Thread. https://t.co/nWRIEbbOUv
Francesco Guicciardini, who was 14 years Macchiavelli’s junior, also served the Florentine Republic. Not being as prominent in the government, he was allowed to retain his office when the Medici returned to power—he was even brought into Papal service under the Medici pope Leo X.
His history describes the same kinds of plots and power plays that Machiavelli emphasizes, in a perfectly matter-of-fact manner. But unlike Machiavelli, he is privy to the specific circumstances and describes them in great detail—he completely avoids stating general principles.