Something I learned from René Girard, which has always stuck with me, is that the Crucifixion was a "trap" set for Satan.
When you think of it as a genius plot to tempt Evil into abolishing itself, the logic is really illuminated and its coherence becomes hard to deny. 🧵
Paul writes to the Corinthians: "If the princes of this world had known [the wisdom of God] they would not have crucified the Lord of glory" (1 Cor. 2:8).”
They thought it would be just another "single victim mechanism." They'd kill Jesus, and it would promote their interests.
Origen and many of the Greek Fathers compared Jesus to the bait that a fisherman puts on a hook to catch a fish. The fish is Satan.
So how did it work? Well, usually after scapegoating a victim, everyone united in the crime is aligned on a disingenuous narrative. Myths emerge.
Knowing that the princes of this world had every bit of confidence in their primary mechanisms of control (mimetic rivalry and scapegoating single victims), what if God allowed himself to be scapegoated?
It would short-circuit their whole system.
The princes of this world “did not understand that the victim mechanism they unleashed against Jesus would result in truthful accounts.”
In the four accounts of the Passion, for the first time ever, the deceptive system of mimetic contagion would publicly auto-demystify.
“Satan is the mystifier caught in the trap of his own mystification. The single victim mechanism was his personal property...
But in the Cross this mechanism escapes once and for all from the control Satan exercised over it, and as a result the world looks completely different.”
I alluded to this months ago and started hemorrhaging followers so badly that I immediately deleted the tweet in a moment of cowardice. I've been ashamed of that ever since.
I think abortion is probably wrong. Unfollow, idc.
I'm not really interested in talking about the topic and I am not above anyone: As a younger man, I would have 100% supported an abortion if I caused an unintended pregnancy. So it is only out of 'moral luck' that I have not participated in it myself.
If you think abortion can be justifed, I can see some of the arguments, although I reject them.
What I cannot fathom—and where I see the signature of Evil incarnate—is the view that abortion is *obviously, definitely* ethical.
The apocalypse has already begun and the antichrist will be precisely what you least expect.
1/6
In a 2009 interview, Girard affirmed his view that we are living through the biblical apocalypse. But his view of apocalypse is unique.
For Girard, it's a long and "slow increase in the symptoms of destabilization."
2/6
For Girard, apocalypse is not fire and brimstone.
It's boredom.
The "long, endless period of apocalypse is getting a little tiresome. And, then, if you really look it is probably extremely noncreative. Today do you feel the arts are as productive as they were in the past?"
3/6
In a 2008 interview with Last Things, René Girard was asked a series of questions about his relationship to Christianity.
I love how detached and thoughtful he is toward culture war topics.
Quick thread on what surprised me the most (e.g. on marriage, homosexuality, etc.)
While it's widely believed he stumbled into Christianity through his research, in fact he had a Christian upbringing; his research was instead a renewal. He acknowledges the importance of childhood experiences, and says his devout mother was an influential figure for him.
He sees little difference between Europe and America when it comes to the traditionalist vs. progressive conflict in Christianity.
He says the question is simply whether one is a Christian or not.