The 1023, together with the explosive testimony yesterday of the IRS whistleblowers, allow us to fill in some blanks and add some meat to the timeline of govt corruption as bad or worse than anything this country has seen.
The scheme began in 2014 when Hunter went on the board of Burisma. According to what Zlochevsky told the FBI’s trusted CHS, Zlovesky put Hunter there for protection-not by Hunter, but by VP Joe Biden. The Bidens - both Hunter and Joe- twisted Zlochevsky’s arm in a shakedown.
Zlochevsky got his money’s worth in early 2016, when Joe got the prosecutor investigating Burisma fired by threatening to withhold a $1 billion loan guarantee by the US. Money had flowed to the Biden’s earlier than that- a fact no doubt used by Hillary to induce Joe not to run.
It’s not clear when the FBI and CIA first became aware of the millions of foreign money paid to the Bidens. But if Hillary knew, what are the odds the nation’s spies and LE officials were left in the dark?
During his campaign in 2016, Trump’s campaign came under investigation by the FBI - at the urging, and quite a bit of prodding by Hillary team, in the form of the Steele dossier and phony Alfa Bank hoax.
That investigation continued, without any evidence or legitimate predicate, into Trump’s presidency. The FBI even spied on Congressional staffers who were getting too close to the truth that the investigation was baseless.
Meanwhile, according to the 1023, evidence began trickling into the FBI of the Biden family corruption. A trusted informant got Zlochevsky to talk, explaining in detail what the deal with the Bidens was, the money that was laundered to them, and what Burisma got in return.
When Trump called the president of Ukraine to ask for assistance in investigating what happened in Ukraine with the prosecutor and Joe Biden, Trump was impeached. The 1023s and confidential informant never surfaced. They were buried.
Of course that’s the type of corruption that inevitably becomes fodder for any political opponent, and the 2020 election season was upon us. So what did the FBI do with the evidence? They buried it deeper. And they created an alternate narrative should anything come to light.
The alternate narrative, spread far and wide by the FBI among mainstream media and social media, was that it was all Russian disinformation. The evil Russians were at it again, trying to influence our election.
Of course, to pull off that narrative the 1023s of the CHS could never see the light of day. That included keeping it secret from investigators from another agency- the IRS- who were hot on Hunter’s trail because he didn’t pay taxes on millions of foreign money.
The 1023 was buried, the laptop was buried at first, then treated publicly as Russian disinformation, and all who espoused an alternate version of the facts were censored- with the help of the FBI.
Thanks to Sen Grassley, Sen Johnson, Rep Comer, Rep Jordan, and Rep Smith, we now have a far more complete picture of this sordid scheme.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Biden bribery plot thickens. First was Grassley’s bombshell this weekend about an October 23, 2020, briefing by the Pittsburgh US attorney’s office of a Delaware AUSA and Baltimore field office FBI agents. The subject was the FBI form 1023 in which a CHS described the bribe.
There’s been no report of ANY further investigation into a possible $10M bribe since then, and Grassley seeks answers to what happened. Those being briefed were DE AUSA Wolf and a couple of Baltimore Field Office agents. Excluded from the meeting were IRS investigators (the WBs).
IRS WBs say they never were told about the 1023 and the investigation out of Pittsburgh that concluded the bribe story was not Russian disinformation. That’s a massive red flag, because the IRS investigators were experienced with international tax and money flow investigations.
Rep Comer says he saw the multi page document. It describes a scheme involving complex bank transfers, as previously shown by Comer’s Oversight Committee to involve millions being passed through LLCs and into accounts owned by various Biden family members.
The FBI told him the matter is still under investigation, and the allegations have not been disproven. Comer says Congress needs the document as part of its investigation. “I’m supposed to take the FBI’s word that they’re investigating this?” He said.
Rep Raskin said there’s nothing here, b/c AG Barr asked a US Atty in PA to assess it, and the decision was made to close the file. Raskin didn’t explain whether that was what the FBI said today and how that can possibly be squared with what Comer said about ongoing investigation
@ClimateAudit makes a great point here about the curious absence from the ICA of any mention of the Clinton Plan, designed to target Trump with fabricated claims of a conspiracy with Russia. The Steele dossier made it into the ICA because Obama wanted “everything” to be in it.
By excluding the Clinton Plan, the IC community fed the narrative that the entire Russiagate investigation was supported and fueled by Putin’s desire to “help Trump.” The FBI brass went even further less than two months later. They briefed OOJ’s Dana Boente in early March.
Now let’s consider Chris Wray’s response. His deputy’s latest letter explains that the FBI wants to explain in detail the CHS process, how many are unreliable druggies or gang members, and how their information is often not reliable, tainted, or “disinformation.”
To expose any of this to Congressional scrutiny would risk the CHS and the whole CHS program, the FBI argues. In a backhanded way the FBI makes @ProfMJCleveland’s point. Wray is merely piling on to the corrupt burying of this CHS and his evidence of Biden bribes.
Source was arrested in Israel to shut him up, he claims. He said he gave the info to FBI in 2019, and they ignored him.
“Luft said he tried four years ago to inform the DOJ that Chinese state-controlled energy company CEFC had paid $100,000 a month to President Biden’s son Hunter and $65,000 to Joe’s brother Jim, in exchange for their FBI connections and use of the Biden name ….”
@mtaibbi don’t let Rep Goldman sidestep the issue using “Russian interference” as a pretext. In the context of the Twitter Files, the FBI knew full well where Giuliani got a copy of the hard drive- from the same repairman the FBI got its copy. RUSSIA RUSSIA was a deflection.
The FBI had a warrant to read Giuliani’s texts and emails and to listen to his calls. That’s what makes the entire pre-bunking operation- and Goldman’s questions about a phony “nuanced” legal issue- particularly outrageous.
Not to mention the plain words of the First Amendment. @HansMahncke says it here: