With opposition to Pope Francis among some priests (and even bishops), it's worth remembering how some priests who found themselves at odds with their superiors reacted in the past. Pedro Arrupe, SJ, former superior general of the Society of Jesus, after suffering a stroke...
...was removed from his post in 1981 by St. John Paul II. His "vicar," or assistant, Fr. Vincent O'Keefe, SJ, an American Jesuit widely seen as Arrupe's choice for successor as superior general, was also removed from his position....
Arrupe's response? Even in his weakened state, Father Arrupe publicly declared his obedience to the Holy Father, instructed every Jesuit to be obedient and pointedly sent around this photo to every Jesuit house in the world. (It hung in my novitiate near the front door.)
I later heard from many in the Vatican and the Society that St. John Paul II eventually concluded that he had been misled by some people, and was surprised not only by Father Arrupe's obedience, but by that of the Society, and the two later enjoyed a warm relationship...
@ThomasReeseSJ when fired as editor in chief of @americamag, at the behest of Cardinal Ratzinger, packed his bags and moved to his next assignment; Robert Drinan, SJ (with whom I disagreed with on some topics), when instructed not to run for public office again, also assented...
John Courtney Murray, SJ, when told not to write any longer on matters of church and state, quietly returned his books to the library, as one of his Jesuit contemporaries told me. On a less exalted level, I've also been asked to do things out of obedience and did them...
It pains me to see so many priests (and even bishops) fomenting opposition to Pope Francis. And I know that there are other examples of Jesuits not being obedient (or silent). Also, I could just as easily hold up members of other religious orders. (The Jesuit examples are..
...obviously foremost in my mind.) Thomas Merton, for example, was censored by his Trappist superiors in the 1960s, and told not to write publicly about the Cold War, and he also assented. The message for me is that when you pronounce a vow of obedience in a religious order...
...or make the promise of obedience as a priest to your ordinary, or as a bishop promise obedience to the Holy Father, and you disagree with something, instead of digging in your heels, attacking your superior and fomenting public opposition, there are...
...other options, as demonstrated by most priests, religious and bishops, who live out their vows and promises quietly and without fanfare. Merton's words after his silencing have always helped me in this regard. God is using his vows, he believed, as I do...
..."to attain ends which I myself cannot at the moment see or comprehend."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gospel: Today Jesus uses the image of old wineskins and and old piece of cloth to illustrate the quality of newness of the reign of God (Mt. 9). You don't put a new patch on an old piece of cloth since the original cloth is already shrunken and, when washed, the new piece...
will pull away. Likewise, you don't put new wine in old wineskins because when the grapes ferment more, the wine will expand and burst the old skins. As C.H. Dodd said, Jesus used similes and metaphors from "nature and everyday life" to help people understand God's reign...
Here, the newness is all. God's reign is fully here, since Christ is the reign of God incarnate, but it is also not fully here, since, as we see, there is still war, violence, poverty and injustice in the world. This is the "already-not yet" quality of God's reign. But...
I would have more sympathy with web designers who refuse to serve certain people because of deeply held religious beliefs, if those certain people weren't always same-sex couples. Do they, e.g., refuse to serve people who are divorced, which Jesus himself condemns (Mt 19:9)?...
Do the refuse to serve non-Christians (which would surely be illegal) who don't believe in the Incarnation or Resurrection? Could a Catholic refuse to serve a Protestant?
The response is usually, "Well, this is about objecting to their offensive practices, not their beliefs..."
In that case, besides refusing to serve divorced couples, they should refuse to serve couples living together before being married, as well as people who don't give to the poor or welcome strangers (Mt 25), people who call others names (Mt 5:21-22) and so on...
Gospel: Can you see that small grey chapel to the left of this photo? That's called the Chapel of the Primacy of Peter, and it's where today's Gospel happened (Jn 21:1-14), in which the Risen Christ prepared breakfast for the disciples...
(who would have had this view of him from their boat). Inside the Chapel is a stone called the "Mensa Christi," the Table of Christ, where he is supposed to have cooked the meal. Just to the right is the Mount of Beatitudes, where, by tradition, he preached the Beatitudes...
If you look carefully you can see the Chapel of the Beatitudes crowning the small hill. Underneath it (that is, on the shoreline) is the Bay of Parables, where Jesus would have preached the parables from a boat not far from the shoreline...
For the last five years, I've been working on a book on the Raising of #Lazarus, today's beautiful Gospel reading from Jn 11, called "Come Forth." The book includes some images of Lazarus from art, as well as photos of current-day Bethany, Al Eizariya. The first is the oldest...
....known image of Lazarus, in the Giordani Catacombs, from the 4C.
Next is James Tissot's image, which depicts the current-day layout of the tomb with remarkable accuracy. Tissot spent months in the Holy Land in the late 19C trying to capture the landscape and peoples...
Here is an image from the "Les Très Riches Heures du Duc de Berry," a 15C prayer book, which shows Lazarus crawling out of his marble tomb. As is the tradition, someone covers his face against the "stench" reported in today's Gospel....
Today someone, perhaps inadvertently, attributed to me a quote from Cardinal McElroy that I tweeted out, after linking to his article. The response was a deluge of hateful tweets, DMs & spam on all my accounts: "sodomite," "fairy," f----t," "fornicator," "heretic," "apostate"...
Even after the original tweet was deleted later in the day, the hate and anger continued. And even though I've been on social media for years, I'm still amazed by the rage that people feel towards LGBTQ people (and sometimes me). Here's the thing: I have strong feelings...
...about different people in the church, some of whom I disagree with very strongly. But I would never use the kind of hate-filled language that people use online, or engage in vicious ad hominem attacks, much less threaten them with harm. It's just astonishing to me...
Remarkable statement from the German Bishops Conference on LGBTQ people (1/27/23): "This year, the German Bishops' Conference is also focusing its commemoration on the queer victims of National Socialism, i.e. homosexual and bisexual people..."
"...as well as transgender and intersex people. The Auxiliary Bishop Ludger Schepers (Essen), who is responsible for LGBTQ* pastoral care from the Pastoral Commission of the German Bishops' Conference, explains:
"This day is an occasion for the Catholic Church to look at its own history of supporting homophobic behavior during National Socialism and afterwards to confess.” One’s own attitude contributed to the fact that homosexuals and other people with a queer identity were humiliated..