1. The Devastating Decline of Hindus in #Manipur – 1901-2001
Manipur today is a minority Hindu state. Hindus have become a minority in yet another state of India. They are 49% here (includes Sanmahis). In 1901, they were 96%. This is the story of decimation of Hindus in Manipur.
2. In 1901 the proportion of Hindus + Sanmahis (natural dharmic religion of Manipur) constituted more than 96% of the population of Manipur with both the valley and hills having an overwhelming majority of non-Christians and non-Muslims.
3. In 1911 they was a decline of around half a percent of their percentage share and Hindus become 95.77% with mostly Muslim migrants from Bengal gaining in population. Christians are non-existent at this stage with only 0.038% population but they are also increasing.
4. In 1921 there is a decline of more than one percent in Hindu population. This is an increase of more than 200% decline in percentage of decline itself. But Hindus still form 94.39% of population. Christians on the other hand triple their population to rise above 1%.
5. In 1931 the rate of decline increases precipitatingly with a loss of more than 2%. Hindus are now 92.54%. Muslims gain half a percent and Christian once again more than double their percentage becoming 2.33%. The hill tribes (Nagas + Kukis) have started converting.
6. The British saw their tea plantations in Assam under threat from the hill tribes and for that they sought to control them and the best way to control them was to convert them and in North East the British actively encouraged missionaries to convert the tribes.
7. In 1941, for the first time in long history of Bhāratavarṣa, percentage of Hindus (natural religionists) decline to less than 90% to 89.20%. They lose 3% in one decade. Christians once again double their population to more than 5%. The British conversion agenda is working.
8. In 1951, change in demography is a devastating sign for Hindus in future. In the decade of independence, Hindus lose around 8% of their population percentage in just one decade. Christians cross 10% line to become 11.84% and become the largest minority of the state.
9. In 1961, Christianity is running rampant and Hindus are reduced to less than 74%. Christians increase to almost 20%. The hill tribes are being converted en masse in independent India and hill religions are being devastated by Christianity under the hateful neglect of Nehru.
10. In 1971, Christians become more than 1/4th of the population of Manipur by crossing 25% mark, to become 26.03%. Baptist Church is ravaging the northern Naga tribes and Presbyterian Church is ravaging the tribes of southern Manipur hills. Hindus are meagerly 67%.
11. In 1981, Christians almost become 30% and Muslims also see a steady increase and touch 7%. Hindus are reduced to 63%. This is the era when entire North East is devastated by Islamic invasions and Christian conversions and New Delhi sleeps in hateful ignorance.
12. In 1991, Christians become more than 1/3rd of Manipur’s population to 34.12%. Muslims also cross 7% figure for the first time and Hindus, keep declining in 9th straight decade since these surveys began, dipping to less than 60% - to 58.62%.
13. In 2001, Hindus are reduced to a thin majority of 54% and Christians increase to around 36%, nearing a majority mark.
14. Here we see a majority Hindu population steadily declining for 10 straight decades in 20th century, without an exception! If that’s not alarming, what is?
15. In 2011, till the time of last census, Hindus dip further, nearer losing majority status and are 52%. Christians increase to around 38%. Muslims grow steadily too, by migrations from Bangladesh. The stage is now set for reversal of majority-minority equation.
16. In 2021, the tables are finally turned and Hindus become minority in Manipur for the first time as their percentage dips below 50% to around 49% in the state first time in the history of Bhāratavarṣa. Christians are 42% and increasing, but that’s not the end of story.
17. Right now in 2023, the percentage of Christians in hills is almost 100% saturated as the hill tribes are now 100% converted.
Now the Church is pushing the Christians onto the valley Hindus to encroach their lands and law is with the Church.
18. The hill tribes which are Christian are marked as ST. But the valley tribes which are Hindus, are not and so no Hindu can settle in a Christian land, but all Christians and Muslims can settle in Hindu lands.
So now the final push has begun.
19. As the Hindu valley (15% of the land) is surrounded by Christian hills (85% of the land) from ALL sides, the Church and Bangladeshi Muslims are all surrounding, besieging, and encroaching upon Hindu #Meitei tribe of the valley they are also retaliating.
20. But the Meitei Hindus are fighting for survival, while the Christian #Kuki tribes are expanding the dictum of the Church. Hindus need to see the truth through dharmic lens.
Manipur is Kashmir like tragedy which nobody cared about.
#कुकीसमुदाय
21. Now is the time if we don’t want to repeat the Manipur tragedy on an India-wide scale. Hindus were devastated and turned into a minority from near absolute majority in just one century. If we don’t learn from Manipur, we will all be in that stage sooner or later.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. The Battle Against Hindus in #Manipur and what is the solution
Manipur is currently fighting a civil war. The hill tribes of Kuki clan are clashing with Meitei tribe of the valley.
2. The immediate trigger is the push against the illegal poppy plantations in Manipuri hills which are mostly inhabited by the #Kuki tribes who are angered at the government action.
3. Another trigger is the High Court order to include some #Meiteis also in the Scheduled Tribe category angering the Kuki Christian clans who see it as erosion of their monopoly over the privileges that come with ST tag.
1 of 16 On Sadhus eating meat... and on Swami Vivekananda not being from 'right parampara'
Our tradition has all the answers to the age old questions but truth needs to reinstated all the time so that falsehood does not overpower even temporarily. So here it is.
2 of 16 It is funny to see how people believe Shri Amogh Lila Ji of ISKCON as an authority on Swami Vivekananda, but at the same time doubt Swami Ji for 'not being from a traditional sampradaya'.
3 of 16 First of all that is wrong. He was from a traditional samparadaya, and brought no revolution. He was bringing in Hindu renaissance, to bring back the lost glory of once glorious tradition. He was not inventing anything radically new.
1. HOW SAWAI JAI SINGH AND RAMANANDI SADHUS LAID RECLAIM ON AYODHYA
The Islamic invasion of India destroyed millions upon millions of Hindu temples. No important and ancient Hindu temple survived intact. Most were destroyed completely.
2. Even then, Hindu rulers and sages kept trying to revive Hindu civilization and to save Hindu heritage by rebuilding Hindu temples.
3. The Amer ruler, Sawai Jai Singh (1700-1743) and the Ramanandi sadhus were some of them.
The demand for a Hindu Holocaust Museum at the Rama Temple, Ayodhya is not an unusual one.
2. Temple legends, also called Sthala Puranas, have incorporated temple destruction and Islamic iconoclasm in their stories to inform the devotees about their enemies.
3. Ekalingamahatmya is the Sthala Purana of the Eklinga temple, Mewar. The original temple was built by Bappa Rawal in 8th century.
After the Age of Rama passed, Ayodhya, his glorious capital, fell on hard times. But always some great king rose to restore the glory of the immortal city.
2. When the British encountered Ayodhya, the local tradition was that it was the great king Vikramaditya of Ujjayini who had restored the glory of Ayodhya. But it is doubtful.
3. Historians believe that it is more likely that it was Chandragupta II of the Gupta Dynasty, also called Vikramaditya, who restored Ayodhya to its former glory.
Leftist historians often claim that the ‘Rama Cult’ is confined to the ‘Cow Belt’ and people in South India do not even know the name of Rama. They also claim that the Rama cult was created during the British Raj.
2. Padma Shri Dr. Meenakshi Jain debunks this myth in her work ‘Rama and Ayodhya’.
3. The story of the Ramayana has been told around 300 times in India and in all linguistic and cultural regions of India.