People know about affirmative action in universities, medicine, etc, but what about in government?
What does it mean when constituencies are more worried about their politicians looking like them than performance?
Here's the story of Eddie Jordan, New Orleans DA, 2003-2007 🧵
Jordan was at first a federal prosecutor. He oversaw the prosecution of Louisiana governor Edwin Edwards for corruption.
At the same time, he refused to prosecute politician Cleo Fields, even though the FBI had him on video stuffing $25K from Edwards into his pocket
Why prosecute Edwards and not Fields? We may never know.
In 2002, Jordan was elected District Attorney of Orleans Parish.
Two weeks after taking office, his first priority was to fire 43 employees, of which 42 were white and 1 was Hispanic.
He went on to hire 68 people in their place, 92% of them black. https://t.co/4WdHMH8HB7nola.com/news/crime_pol…
Those who were fired included the majority of his investigative staff. The effects were described as "catastrophic." The blacks that replaced them had little or no experience.
Under Jordan, New Orleans would have the highest murder rate in the nation. https://t.co/zoLoPAhxzDnytimes.com/2007/10/31/us/…
Jordan was sued, and the fired employees were awarded $3.7 million.
Jordan couldn't pay the verdict, and the city wouldn't bail him out. It got to the point where the fired white employees were going to be able to start seizing the furniture of the DA office to get their money.
Jordan therefore resigned in disgrace.
Employees of his office described a lack of office supplies like paper clips, phone lines that didn't work, and a DA who rarely showed up to work.
His only priority was apparently replacing white employees with black ones.
Under Jordan, in 2003 and 2004, the conviction rate for murder and attempted murder in New Orleans was 12%, compared to 80% nationwide. Again, this was in a city that was leading the country in murder. https://t.co/GDk3ac82g7csmonitor.com/2007/0118/p01s…
Days before his resignation, a New Orleans man robbed a liquor store. As it turned out, he had been "visiting" Jordan's girlfriend at the house that they shared, and then returned there after he was done.
As was usual in New Orleans, charges against the man were never pursued.
After resigning in disgrace, Eddie Jordan returned to private practice.
Last time he was in the news, it was for allegedly slipping an envelope with drugs in it to his client while in court. https://t.co/gCHFgvj4BUnola.com/news/crime_pol…
It's important to note that Jordan maintained support throughout the black community while all this was going on. It's possible he would have been releected if he hadn't resigned after bankrupting his office with the civil rights lawsuit.
In July 2007, the community came out in support of Jordan, even after the civil rights lawsuit and years of neglecting to prosecute violent crime. What the NYT described as a "vociferous" black crowd denounced other politicians who tried to hold him accountable.
The story of Eddie Jordan is the story of the American inner city.
Racial voting leads to corrupt and incompetent politicians, who only feel pressure to give their constituents jobs.
Those they hire are incompetent, but that doesn't matter. As long as whites aren't in charge.
It's particularly tragic because the constituents are of course worse off. Eddie Jordan didn't hire that many people! There aren't enough city jobs to uplift black communities. And the whole city suffers from a high crime rate and government incompetence.
But that doesn't matter. Racial voting is psychological, not a matter of group self-interest. It's actually self-destructive.
This is the mistake white racialists make. "They look out for their own, we should do the same."
Yeah, look at how well that's worked out for them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Man comes to the US from Lebanon. Starts out delivering pizzas, becomes a Nobel winning neuroscientist. Trump freezes his funding, he gets an email from China offering to move his lab “any city, any university I want" with guaranteed funding for 20 years.
How to think about immigration. You should be paranoid about the possibility that the US rejects geniuses. One brilliant entrepreneur can or inventor can carry a lot of dead weight. Almost all immigration is good, but this would be true even if it wasn't. richardhanania.com/p/exchange-wit…
Earlier I discussed Casey Means, Trump's nominee for Surgeon General, and her mystical and quack beliefs.
I've looked into her story about how she left her residency. It's very strange, and indicates that there's something that we don't yet know.
Means says she was in an otolaryngology residency and almost finished, but she instead decided to quit because her surgical residency didn't focus on nutrition enough. Isn't that something she would have known well before 4 years of residency, on top of medical school?
I think the real reason was she was unfit. Look at her cohort. The other two doctors went straight through their residency normally. Means, in contrast, had a one month gap between June-July 2018. I don't know what can explain this, but it indicates something abnormal happened.
Trump just nominated Casey Means for Surgeon General.
This is a lunatic who will do serious damage to public health. Thread here, which will only be able to scratch the surface.
She'll be the first occupant of the office to believe in using spiritual mediums, praying to ancestor shrines, doing full moon ceremonies to amplify her dreams, asking the trees in the forest to deliver her a hunky man, being a shroomhead, and praising indigenous wisdom.
She has no academic achievements to speak of. All she did was med school and she dropped out before completing her residency. This is weird, as anyone in medicine will tell you.
I've written the Trump reckoning you've been waiting for.
I used to think Dems would turn us into Western Europe. That looks good now when the other side is offering third world levels of incompetence, corruption, and authoritarianism.
I convinced myself that the choice was between leftism and conservatism, but it's actually first world leftism versus third world authoritarianism.
I didn't want to believe it! It means I have to be much more pessimistic about the future of America.
Partly it's because I was getting bad information. People close to the admin told me that RFK wouldn't be at HHS and economic policy wouldn't be so insane. But it turns out I was only talking to people who agreed with me, and they were engaging in their own wishful thinking.
Here is Vinod Balachandran, the lead researcher on a team that just created an mRNA vaccine for pancreatic cancer, which has a 90% death rate.
His study showed that within five years, 75% of patients were both alive and cancer free, a miraculous result. mRNA technology for covid was of course pioneered by Katalin Karikó, a woman from rural Turkey.
We debate immigration and ideas, numbers and data. What gets me is the overwhelming gap between the accomplishments of scientists like this and the lives that they're saving on the one side, and the sense of mediocrity you get from immigration critics that is so overwhelming it's offensive. One guy is unlocking the mysteries of the cell and giving those who were doomed to a painful death more time on this earth with friends and family. The other is whining "I want whites to own the local 7/11."
For me, it's sometimes easier to be motivated by hate than a positive vision. Many people are like that. But if that's you, it's good to direct your hate at the right targets. Immigration restrictionists hate people because of what they look like or where they were born. That's wrong, and should be replaced by a feeling of hatred towards those who would deny humanity its ability to move forward because they need reasons to feel superior to others.
One genius creates value that outweighs what thousands and thousands of less spectacular individuals cost. That's even granting the premise of restrictionists that the average immigrant is a cost, which is simply not true. richardhanania.com/p/exchange-wit…
To be fair, here is a thread arguing that the results might not be as impressive as they originally seem. This is what science is about, any new innovation will be validated or discredited and learned from. It will be talented people from all over the world who push knowledge forward no matter what the result. The bitter racists will have nothing to contribute to this mission regardless of what the results of any particular line of research are, except perhaps delaying human progress.
Ayn Rand on racists as losers: “The overwhelming majority of racists are men who have earned no sense of personal identity, who can claim no individual achievement or distinction, and who seek the illusion of a ‘tribal self-esteem’ by alleging the inferiority of some other tribe”
“Observe the hysterical intensity of the Southern racists; observe also that racism is much more prevalent among the poor white trash than among their intellectual betters.”
“The simplest collective to join, the easiest one to identify—particularly for people of limited intelligence—the least demanding form of ‘belonging’ and of ‘togetherness’ is: race.”