Lain as the substance by which the Wired lives and moves in, and as the product of her Father's intellect is weirdly Christological. But she is also at the same time the sinner who forgot their dignity, trapped in delusion.
The call to "love Lain" and to shun that instead of becoming the self-gratifying evil-Lain is Lain purifying herself through humility in order to escape said delusion. Coming to Wisdom through humility.
Lain exhibits many of these Eckhartian themes. In some sense, the soul is the Son (hypostatic union assuming universal humanity it shares in common) but in some sense not (a distinct individual).
Lain realising herself through humility is an image of our process of theosis and sanctification. The ending to the show is crucial. The world finally forgetting Lain, that is she has become dead to the world through detachment, allows her to finally have conquered the world.
As Meister Eckhart says in one of his most famous, and characteristically harsh, talks of instruction to his Dominican brothers, "Truly, if a man renounced a kingdom or the whole world but held on to himself, he would not have renounced anything. What is more, if a manー
ーrenounces himself, whatsoever else he retains, riches or honours or whatever it may be, he has forsaken everything (Counsel 3).
He who desires nothing, possesses all things and grow within himself as an adopted Son of the Most High. It's the tragic reality of many a Saint, to either live in such a way so far removed from the everyday culture, or to be despised by it. But that tragedy makes the Saint.
Masamai Eiri created tried to fashion Lain for explicitly gnostic reasons - for humans to leave their bodies - to escape the prison of the human security system, coerced through the Wired, to become one with Lain through a soteriological shortcut: suicide.
This ought to have appealed to Lain as lonely, craving human contact as she was, latches onto anyone who shows her the slightest bit of love.
Yet, in the end, she commits the ultimate selfless sacrifice by making herself permanently lonely. Lain instead chose to flip this on its head - she sacrificed her individuality, because of her largely unrequited [except for Alice] love for humanity.
She remains in her human body and refuses to become a god of the renewed universe because she loves all humans. Everyone loves Lain and in return Lain loves all of them, even if they don’t know it and she struggles with this immensely although accepting it.
It’s only after being comforted by the image of her father that she can accept her sacrifice and move on with the rest of eternity. She essentially commits kenosis in the most extreme wayー
ーbeyond removing herself from the world she removes herself from existence, remembered in recollection faintly by those who were closest to her.
Total apophasis of self.
Might we put it this way:
Lain becomes dead to the world (cf. Galatians 6:4) in order to truly intercede for the whole world. That is how dearly she loves everyone.
Lain ends Protocol 7 by becoming the fundamental substrate of reality, detached from earthly existence rather than merely the god of the Wired - not becoming the rouge demiurge Eiri wanted her to become.
The Gnostic God of the OT as an evil imposter is Masami Eiri and his designs. Or at least he planned to be this and failed. Yet simultaneously it is Eiri who wants to free humans from the prison of their bodies, which is the characteristic other-half of the Gnostic formulationー
ーthe irrational Demiurge created a haphazard reality, evident in the body, that must be overcome. Lain rejects this entire formulation - Lain rebukes the Gnostic proposal and aspect, rejecting that existence in the world is inherently evil in rejecting Eiri.
The imposter here is itself the Gnostic formulation that had already killed countless people in the show from the first episode. This entire dynamic is overturned from ever being a possibility by Lain through kenosis.
However the symbolic conclusion of the show isn't one of beatitude. That would be the case if the show was strictly Christian, or perhaps Lain remains in purgatory? Either way she's stuck in perpetual gloom while the world is safe.
Through Western history, man's subjectivity was an objective entity actually embedded in a historical process that connected him ultimately all the way back to the Hellenes and the like, but the modern individual has no connections to anything but the luminous glow of cyberspace.
With the annihilation of all geographic distance due to globalising technologies, there is nowhere for the individual to go. The world interior of civilisation now exists on a glowing, self-luminous surface in front of him.
There is, furthermore, "nothing to achieve", since all utopian projects have come to an end with the liquidation of all social formations through the social corrosion of techno-capital works as an engine for.
As evil as the gnostic Protocol-7 was, Lain resetting the Wired, and thus also reality itself, traded this Utopian vision for her eternal lonelinessーfor a hypermodern existenceーdisconnected yet fully immersed in the world before her.
Floating discarnate, de-worlded and decontextualised from all world horizons, save Alice who doesn't remember her, Lain has no connection to anything.
Lain, much like the Hypermodern individual is a world unto herself. Our pilgrimage in this reprobate culture of advanced capitalist modernity should likewise be treated as purgatorial and corrective. Realising the true dignity of our nature through humility.
/fin
@Wired73813850 @piff_jack @driftlesscath
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The term, "Church Militant" is one we are all too familiar with and often complacent in its true meaning. A thread on St. Bonaventure's understanding of what it truly means to be a militant ecclesia:
Let's begin with an analogy from the Seraphic Doctor illustrating the unity of the sacramentsーBaptism, Confirmation, the Holy Eucharist, Confession, Extreme Unction, Orders and Matrimony as they concern this military theological thematic:
"Baptism is designed for those just entering the fight, Confirmation for those engaged in combat, the Eucharist for those refreshing their strength, Penance for those rising from their sickbeds, Extreme Unction for those who are departingー
i) Just as Latria (the worship due to God alone) is due to the whole Human Nature of Christ, so is it due to the individual parts of His hypostatically united nature.
ii) Jesus's Sacred Heart is an individual part of His human nature.
∴ Latria is due to Jesus's Sacred Heart.
This also extends to:
- The Holy Face
- Five Holy Wounds and the members associated with them
- The Most Precious Blood
- The Head of the Suffering Redeemer
The mysteries of His life, His suffering, His death, His conception, birth, etc., are all analogically objects of the worship of Latria. To reject the worship of the Sacred Heart would implicitly imperil the honour due to all the other facets of the Latria given to His humanity.
One of the key points that every Neoplatonist differed from Aristotle was in rejecting "thought thinking itself" as the First principle. God, the One, in His simplicity so they argued, must transcend this:
So why do they reject this? Why reject "thought" being attributed to the First Principle? Is God not Wise, or Omniscient?
The first thing to consider is how the Neoplatonists thought of thinking. What does "thinking" mean to the Platonists?
In one of the previous Neoplatonism ramble threads I wrote, we explored the general suspicion of discursive thinking that the Platonists held to:
1) A proof in the converse from the truth of hylomorphism 2) An argument from soteriology 3) St. Maximus the Confessor 4) Contra Buddhism qua the operation & nature of consciousness 5) Contra Vedanta qua absolute monism
1) Hylomorphism
======
We are going to proceed as follows:
a) outline of doctrine
b) proof of the doctrine
c) argument
1.a) Outline
----------
The doctrine of hylomorphism runs as such: that an individual is a substantial unity of form specified through matter. Matter takes its determination through form. Form takes some kind of designated matter as the site of its activity.
Ah yes thank you for the reminder that the common rabble is braindead much appreciated martin ー shiki had to wait 20 years before he was remade to be anywhere near as much of a chad as Shirou always was
Sed contra: God created the human substance such that it is equal in all persons.
He did not create them such that they were all equal across all kinds of excellence. Proof of this: in the pre-lapsarian state there would've been civil subjection and thus hierarchy/inequality.
God created everyone equally in His image. He did not create them identical in their capacities for excellence. Such is evident from the manifest difference in kind and degree of skills and attributes that make given individuals unique in the first place.