Thread by @goddek

🧵THREAD: In 2009, a whistleblower released emails showing how climate academia was manipulating data and blocking articles that didn’t support their global warming agenda.

Be prepared to delve into the murky depths of one of the biggest scandals of our time? #ClimateGate

#1 The term #ClimateGate was first coined in a critical article by @JamesDeling for the @Telegraph. Unsurprisingly, the piece has since been removed ten years ago. However, the article can still be accessed via the archive (). https://t.co/fp8KM9C2Fharchive.is/wcHp

#2 The leak gives us a glimpse into why these 'scientists' might have preferred to keep them confidential.

One of the most circulated e-mails from the hack is the following from Phil Jones to the original hockey stick authors – @MichaelEMann, @raybradleyUMass and Malcolm Hughes.

#3 Additional emails revealed that they also tried to exclude dissenting scientists from the peer review process. This is deeply unscientific and demonstrates that members of the climate cult are not concerned with the truth.

#4 ClimateGate unveiled an unsettling reality: climate 'experts' can't be trusted. Their integrity is marred by accusations of deceit, data manipulation, and ulterior motives. Worryingly, it appears funding and politics might supersede their dedication to objective science.

#5 The reasons why climate alarmism is a cult can be seen in this graphic. Climate models have been anything but accurate. But instead of validating their own models, these very scientists persist in haphazardly generating more, thereby amplifying the existing state of panic.

#6 The architect of the Hockey Stick Model, @MichaelEMann, and the other 'scientists' escaped repercussions.

Be warned: you may risk your job by tweeting about Vitamin D and Covid measures, as I did. Yet, manipulating climate data and sparking global fear carries no consequence.

#7 These emails were leaked 14 years ago. However, the #ClimateScam is still in full swing today as this clip reveals, and those who were involved in the scandal back then are still portrayed as experts by the media. The parallels with the Covid pseudo-experts are undeniable.

#8 Therefore, it is not surprising that the media (@Masonboyowen) engages in a victim-offender reversal. Instead of thoroughly investigating the scandal, they appeal to emotions and portray the offenders as upright scientists who are trying to uphold the reputation of science.

#9 However, science without dialogue is not science, but dogma. Critics of the theory that CO2 is the main driver of 'global warming' have been censored and publicly ridiculed by the media and pseudo-experts for nearly 20 years. This needs to stop, and I am ready to do my share.