The Nazi regime did not nationalize industries and in fact mass privatized industries wherever possible.
The word “privatization” was coined by The Economist to describe Hitler’s economic policies in Germany.
The Nazi party had a wing called the Strasserite wing, which was led by Otto Strasser and Gregor Strasser. They differed from Hitler's wing in that they supported industrial nationalisation.
Gregor Strasser was assassinated by Hitler in the Night of the Long
Knives, whereas Otto fled the country.
Here's a passage from one of Otto Strasser's books in which he describes a conversation he had with Hitler in which he
tried to convince Hitler to nationalise industries:
Hitler started killing off communists, socialists and trade unionists before he came after Jewish people.
Niemöller was a prominent Lutheran pastor in Germany. He sympathized with many Nazi ideas and supported radically right-wing political movements.
But after Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933, Niemöller became an outspoken critic of Hitler’s interference in the Protestant Church. He spent the last eight years of Nazi rule, from 1937 to 1945, in Nazi prisons and concentration camps.
Hitler really disliked the introduction of the word "socialist" to the party's name.
Because socialism was popular at the time, it was included only to appeal to working people.
Later, as he got stuck with the name, Hitler accepted it while insisting that his socialism was simply identical with nationalism. He explains this in an interview with George Sylvester Viereck, where he was asked this very question;
People who say the Nazis were socialists do so only for political purposes, because they hate socialists and want to disdain them.
The claim is unrelated to historical reality in any way, and their only argument is "it's in the name!" despite Hitler himself objecting to it being in the name, as well as killing socialists and implementing the exact opposite policies that a socialist would.
Xi Jinping: On the final death of Capitalism and the Victory of Socialism.
Thread 🧵
Facts have repeatedly told us that Marx and Engels' analysis of the basic contradictions in capitalist society is not outdated, nor is the historical materialist view that capitalism is bound to die out and socialism is bound to win.
This is an inevitable trend in social and historical development. But the road is tortuous. The eventual demise of capitalism and the ultimate victory of socialism will require a long historical process to reach completion.
From the beginning , there was the corporate backing for Hitler. The extent of this camp's support during the rise of the Nazi Party between 1928 and 1932 is a major topic of discussion.
It is certain that this pre-existing, solid backing increased dramatically in the months leading up to the transfer of power. For a long time, many industrialists were more sceptical of the Nazi Party's putative "socialism" than of its overt anti-Semitism.
In November 1932, the support hit the saturation point. The Nazi Party's vote fell by more than 4% in the Reichstag elections on November 6, while the KPD made significant gains.
A research study was conducted by the University of Barcelona which analyzed German newspapers, media outlets and government documents from 1933 when the Nazis took power all the way to 1941.
The University found that the Nazis engaged in heavy privatization of the economy and removed a lot of the public utilities and ownership that was seen under the Weimar Republic prior to the Nazis taking power.
Some examples of Nazi privatization can be seen with these different economic sectors and utilities.
In an article published in the Der Deutsche Volkswirt in February 1934, Heinz Marschner proposed:
'കേവലം നൂറ്റമ്പത് കൊല്ലം മുമ്പ് ഉൾത്തിരിഞ്ഞ തത്വശാസ്ത്രം' എന്ന് പറഞ്ഞു മാർക്സിസത്തെ പരിഹസിക്കുന്നത് വെറും പ്രഹസനം തന്നെയാണ്. ചില ചരിത്ര വസ്തുതകൾ പരിശോധിക്കുമ്പോൾ മാർക്സിൻ്റെ ചിന്തകളുടെ പ്രസക്തിയും ശക്തിയും നമുക്ക് മനസ്സിലാക്കാവുന്നതാണ്.
2008ലെ സാമ്പത്തിക മാന്ദ്യം ആരംഭിച്ചശേഷം 2009 ജൂലൈയില് , ഇക്കണോമിസ്റ്റ് വാരിക, സാമ്പത്തിക ശാസ്ത്രം നേരിടുന്ന പ്രശ്നങ്ങളെ സംബന്ധിച്ച് ചര്ച്ച ചെയ്യാന് ഒരു സെമിനാര് നടത്തുകയുണ്ടായി.
മുഖ്യധാരാ സാമ്പത്തിക സിദ്ധാന്തങ്ങളുടെ, ബൂര്ഷ്വാ സാമ്പത്തിക ശാസ്ത്രത്തിന്റെ, പ്രസക്തി തന്നെ നഷ്ടപ്പെട്ടുവരുന്നതായാണ് ആ സെമിനാറിലെ ചര്ച്ചകള് വെളിപ്പെടുത്തിയത്.
You must know the statistical theory of random numbers before doing guesswork.
A random number is a number chosen by chance, that is, randomly, from a set of numbers. All the numbers in a specified distribution have equal probability of being chosen randomly.
Several standard tables of random numbers are available, among which the following may be specially mentioned, as they have been tested extensively for randomness:
1. Tippett’s (1927) random number tables. 2. Fisher and Yates (1938) table of random numbers. 3. Kendall and Babington Smith (1939) table of random numbers. 4. Rand Corporation (1955) table of random numbers. 5. C.R. Rao, Mitra and Mathai (1966) table of random numbers.
Women did indeed play a huge role in the Vietnam War in fighting American Imperialism. Women in the Global South have always been on the forefront of fighting imperialism and colonialism.
America's intervention in the Vietnam War was an act of horrific imperialism. America violently intervened in Vietnam to prevent the spread of communism because maintaining its capitalist hegemony has always been America's #1 geopolitical priority.
American violence in Vietnam was characterized by both anti-communism and racism; anti-communism was their motive, and racism was what allowed them to totally disregard Vietnamese lives and slaughter them brutally.