Little to NO public education is offered on the founding of communism or its inseparable bond to Zionism. Time to fix that in a purely historical, emotionless fashion. No animosity is intended.
We must begin with Moses Hess, the father of Zionism
In the late 1800’s Hess sought to develop, through war & banking, an ethnocentric, racist state in Palestine (Israel) from which its people would homogeneously exist & rule over Aryans (non Jewish whites). This is the “moral” & spiritual grounding for Zionism. It lives on today
With the framework for the spiritual war in place, Hess connects with his friend; a descendent of rabbis, extended family to the Rothschild dynasty, & economic intellectual Moses Mordecai Levy (AKA Karl Marx).
Marx goes on to pen the framework of communism as a means to Zionism
Marx builds an economic framework in which the working class only exist to funnel wages to the elites ensuring taxes, confiscation of property, & end of inheritance keep them impoverished. They also aim to end religion, traditional families, & national pride
Another key point is a central bank which forever ensures people & NATIONS are indebted to this system. Ironically, people of the same heritage would later go to develop the Federal Reserve on Jekyll Island & with that, wealthy bankers indebted the world- even our leaders knew it
Marx openly celebrates the death of “racial trash” that were non-Jews across Europe. He states mass extermination was required to wipe out opposition. To level entire civilizations in pursuit of their end. MARX IS THE FIRST KNOWN PERSON TO CALL FOR A HOLOCAUST.
In a 1920 article, Winston Churchill stated international jews aimed to advance Zionism & Bolshevism for the development of a nationalist state. This wasn’t a “conspiracy”. It was the commonly held belief of world leaders across the globe.
Oddly, the Rothschild family, of which Marx was a relative, had BOUGHT Palestine in the early 1800s. Then in the late 1800s, Hertzel, and other intellectuals, said a world war would be needed to enrich this group, & to justify the “giving” of Palestine to the Jews.
It’s CRITICAL to understand this as the foundation of the communist ideology that would ultimately revolt, murder the czar & his family, rule Russia, & COMMIT GENOCIDE AGAINST 60-100 MILLION OF THEIR OWN PEOPLE.
This is the legacy of the Bolsheviks. This is its origin story.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
WHAT IF… a tiny group of people had disproportionate control of culture, mainstream news, social media, politicians, banking, tech, finance, & your nations international policy?
Would it concern if a tiny group enslaved your people?#bantheadl
WHAT IF.. as a result of their control over politics, elections became meaningless? After all, if both your liberal and conservative options had their allegiances purchased by this outside force, does it even matter who wins an election? If both sides are compromised… #bantheadl
WHAT IF.. that group owned the media so thoroughly that this control was never pointed out? That other “villains”, like white supremacy, were merely propagandized to deflect from that ownership. To keep people fighting one another rather than recognizing truly hateful oppressors
As stated here, Jews have a “massive role” in the “fundamental transformation” of Europe via ENDLESS #immigration to ensue the end of heritage white Europe. Opposition to this is labeled antisemitism. #racism
H/Y @doyouhaveapen1
Now what’s curious is:
1. Isn’t group identity dangerous & bad? Why do Jews get to push THEIR agenda when whites pushing back is “#racism”?
2. Is there any other description for this than #genocide?
3. Is pushing back on genocide bad?
4. Is it ONLY applicable to #Europe?
1. Jews are open about their in group preference. In fact, endless studies show they have one of the highest “in group preferences” of ANY group: meaning they hire, promote, & support “their people” endlessly & without shame. Isn’t that “racism”?
@marcowenjones , with 70k followers, just attempted to dismantle the recent @EndWokeness graphic on interracial violence. I’ll now utterly embarrass his cope of a take as it’s laughable.
The first comedy is his take that @elonmusk is using celebrity to push a perspective. 🧵 1
2. Now the obvious irony here is that, with the exception of Elon, almost ALL pop culture icons are rabidly left leaning. So to whine about the amplification from one man, is weak as it gets. But Marc then whines about “the data bias” & manipulation via “selective coverage”
3. What makes this comical is that ALL MAINSTREAM MEDIA DOES THIS & USE SELECTIVE DATA. The difference here is that 90% of mainstream news does it IN THEIR FAVOR. @nytimes@CNN etc..they ALL play cover for black violence by barely mentioning the race or failing to cover it at all