I’m rereading the superseding indictment, and details that have been there since the start are still gobsmacking. Among them? That between Jan. 2021 and Aug. 2022, when the FBI conducted its court-authorized search of Mar a Lago, MAL hosted 150 social events. 1/
Those events included “weddings, movie premieres, & fundraisers that together drew tens of thousands of guests.” Safe to say DOJ/Smith’s team obtained the event staff’s records to illustrate why Trump’s keeping hundreds of classified documents at MAL was reckless & dangerous. 2/
Another thing I only appreciated on a closer, slower reading: The Special Counsel has a list of those federal agencies/departments with a stake in the classified documents at issue. They include the Department of Energy. Why? 3/
Because, as the indictment states, DOE is “responsible for maintaining a safe, secure and effective nuclear deterrent to protect national security, including ensuring the effectiveness of the United States nuclear weapons stockpile without nuclear explosive testing.” 4/
In other words, it’s not just that one or more of the documents addressed *other countries’* nuclear capabilities (see Count 5 on page 33); it’s that at least one of those in Counts 1-32 implicates our own. 5/
And indeed, the document at issue in Count 19 is described as “concerning nuclear weaponry of the United States.” 6/
Less inflammatory, but still significant are signs of the breadth of the evidence the Special Counsel’s team has. While the indictment has long been chock full of Nauta’s texts, it is easier to overlook direct quotes from texts only involving other folks. 7/
Take the text exchange in paragraph 28, for example, where Trump Employees 1 & 2 discuss in April 2021 where to move Trump’s boxes to make room for a staff office. Whose phone did that come from? Employee 2, thought to be former exec assistant Molly Michael? Or Employee 1? 8/
Similarly, in paragraph 80 — part of the new allegations — there is a text between DeOliveira and Trump Employee 4, thought to be Yuscil Taveras, an IT staffer at Mar-a-Lago. Has Taveras’s phone been turned over, via subpoena or voluntarily, or do the feds have DeOliveira’s? 9/
There are also indicia that while Trump may not have texted or emailed on his own devices, he used his staff’s phones. The employee believed to be Michael tells Nauta via text in Dec. 2021, “I’m sorry potus had my phone.” 10/
Let’s assume Trump used staff phones during his WH years to circumvent WH record keeping and/or avoid certain bureaucratic steps, which are not exactly kosher to begin with. But what reasons could he have for doing so in his post-White House life? 11/
(Addendum: Thanks to my colleague @LauraAJarrett, I learned that the feds seized DeOliveira's phone: ). /9.5washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
The superseding indictment reflects the Special Counsel's securing and digesting a host of other data, including phone records & surveillance footage of even outdoor areas around MAL. But what stands out on a fresh read are the unnamed actors & their potential cooperation. 12/
Paragraphs 39-47 show Trump Employee 2 knew Trump retained dozens of boxes of records & was reviewing some in Nov.-Dec. 2021 for return to NARA. She helped Nauta move boxes for Trump's review & texted with Nauta & one of Trump's representatives with NARA about his progress. 13/
And she even helped Nauta load the first 15 boxes returned to NARA into his car and then a commercial truck on 1/17/22. Shortly after the Aug. 2022 search, news broke that the feds had already been in contact with Michael. 14/
Yet nowhere in the indictment is she accused of any false representations to the feds about "the location and movement of boxes before the production to NARA," as Nauta has been. In fact, that's the gist of the false representations charge against him in Count 38. 15/
But what's more interesting is *how* the Special Counsel's office determined Nauta lied to the FBI in May 2022. Because although DOJ sought surveillance footage going back to 1/10/22, it only got footage as of Apr. '22, after boxes were moved around for Trump's NARA review. 16/
Sure, they quote texts between Employee 2 & Nauta. But some of the allegations could only have come from a witness. How else would they know Employee 2 gave Trump a photo of the storage room boxes "by taping it to one of the boxes [she] had placed in [his] residence?" 17/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I want to live in a world where we do not talk about judges as if they owe their allegiance, or their very existence, to a particular president. Based on my experience as both a litigator and a journalist, that describes the vast majority of the federal judiciary. 1/
And yet, Judge Aileen Cannon, for all of her credentials and pre-judicial experience, has consistently staged the hearing of motions in a way that favors Trump and his co-defendants, handpicked a theory of dismissal at the invitation-by-concurrence of Justice Thomas, and even exercised jurisdiction she did not have. 2/
Her actions concerning the Special Counsel’s report, for example, were premised on authority she had stripped herself of by dismissing the case and an eventuality she refused to acknowledge: that the indictment against the two people who would supposedly be prejudiced by the report’s release not only had been dismissed but that DOJ’s pending appeal of her ruling will soon disappear too.
NEW: Per @adamreisstv, Rudy Giuliani is now almost 90 minutes late for a one-day trial on whether his Palm Beach, FL condo can be taken to satisfy his $146 million debt to former GA election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss. 1/
Rudy owes the women that money because his failure to participate in their defamation lawsuit was so complete that they won a default judgment on liability. And when they tried the issue of damages to a jury last December, that $146 million was the jury’s award. 2/
Since then, he has been playing games with several courts in an attempt to conceal or even exclude his assets from being seized to pay them. He first filed for bankruptcy, only to have his case kicked out of court for his obfuscation and withholding of information. 3/
🧵: In October 2024, @SenWhitehouse released a report about the FBI's supplemental investigation of Brett Kavanaugh after allegations that he sexually assaulted Christine Blasey Ford surfaced. 1/
And that report caused Whitehouse to find that the FBI's supplemental investigation was deeply flawed and manipulated by the Trump White House despite public attestations that the FBI had carte blanche to pursue all investigative leads. 2/
In his conclusion, Whitehouse noted, "Reliable background investigations of judicial nominees are crucial to the Senate’s constitutional duty to provide advice and consent," a statement with which I imagine most senators would concur, at least in a general sense. 3/
If Samantha Hegseth, Pete Hegseth’s second (and now ex-)wife, proactively sought to speak with the FBI about her ex-husband, why was she not interviewed? The Senate’s decades-long failure to develop a responsible background check system to exercise its “advise and consent” powers is baffling.
Instead, however, some senators have decided that anonymity automatically discredits sexual misconduct and assault accusations—even though there are multiple ways the Armed Services Committee, the FBI, or both could have vetted her story without revealing her name publicly.
For example, Lindsey Graham was once a reliable and prominent voice for survivors of sexual assault. But lately, he’s been singing a different tune:
NEW: Rudy Giuliani’s back in his old stomping grounds — Manhattan federal district court — this morning. And today, he’s facing the prospect of a contempt ruling for failing to turn over a host of property to two former GA election workers to whom he owes nearly $150 million. 1/
In a filing earlier this week, the women’s attorneys note that despite a clear Oct. 2024 order, Giuliani has not given them the title or deed for his vintage Mercedes convertible or his NY condo, both of which he was ordered to turn over. 2/
They also accuse Giuliani of playing games with respect to the whereabouts of his framed DiMaggio jersey, which a friend testified he had seen in Rudy’s Palm Beach condo within the last two years; cash held in a known Citibank account; and even watches and costume jewelry. 3/
Based on the comments in my last thread, it seems like a lot of folks are misinformed or simply willing to drink the red Kool Aid about the law that allowed E. Jean Carroll to make a sexual assault claim in her second, 2022 lawsuit against him. 1/
First and foremost, E. Jean needed no change in law to bring her second defamation claim against Trump. What begat that was his October 2022 tweet basically repeating the same statements about her that he had made in 2019. 2/
But more fundamentally, the Adult Survivors Act was no “get Trump” cabal. It was an effort, years in the making, to extend statutes of limitations for those who alleged they were sexually abused as adults, not minors, as this @nytimes story illustrates: nytimes.com/2019/10/25/nyr…