The United States has several military bases in the country, and built the massive $110 million drone base in Agadez which was the biggest base-building effort ever undertaken in the history of the U.S. Air Force.
They use it as a chief operating center for AFRICOM whose influence has expanded greatly across the Sahel— conducting military, drone and surveillance operations as part of their *War on Terror* in the continent, as they shift focus away from the MENA and Afghanistan/ Pakistan.
There are currently over 1000 US military and Air Force personnel in Niger. The US often maintains troops/ bases by offering lucrative incentives to local elites— weapons contracts, access to American companies, material aid, etc. as a trade off to conduct operations from there.
Yet these bases themselves become targets for militant attacks. And as US bases have sprawled across the Sahel, *terrorism* has grown in frequency. Again, necessitating American presence furthermore.
Foreign military presence in Niger has everything to do with accessing + controlling its uranium which powers their country's electricity. Recently, the now disposed government of Mohamed Bazoum gave French company Orano exclusive access to the country's uranium mines until 2040.
The military has said they undertook this decision to overthrow the government because of economic and security mismanagement. Remember, Niger is one of 14 African states who since 1961 have been required by France to pay a yearly colonial tax to the French state as compensation.
These countries also have to keep 85% of their foreign reserves in the French central bank; which to access they have to get their permission. France leverages this to gain infrastructural project contracts and exclusive rights on accessing resources for French companies.
It's no surprise then that in the last few days it's the US and France who have expressed grave concern, calling for an urgent need to restore *constitutional order* and *uphold democracy* in the country— aka restore the Pro-western state apparatus.
This is further complicated by the fact that coup supporters have been waving Russian flags and burning French flags; Putin meanwhile held a summit in St.Petersburg for strengthening economic ties with the African continent— forgiving $23 billion in debt owed by African states.
Meanwhile the Wagner group who had been training military personnel in Niger for quite some time now and operating as security for mining operations in Niger and Mali as well, has also thrown their support behind the coup.
Then there's the fact that one of the chief architects in ousting the President, General Moussa Salaou Barmou, head of Niger’s Special Operations Forces, was trained at Fort Benning, Georgia and the National Defense University in Washington.
American trained officers have conducted six coups in nearby Burkina Faso + Mali. They have also been involved in recent coups in the Gambia (2014), Guinea (2021) and Mauritania (2008). That's 11 coups in West Africa since 2008 that have been led by US trained military officers.
The United States as of 2021 had provided Niger with more than $500 million in military assistance and training programs since 2012, while the European Union last year launched a $30 million military training mission in Niger as well.
European investment in Niger's military apparatus is important to note since Niger is central in the migrant crisis as it houses markets that are often the epicenters of human trafficking to Europe, coming from the rest of Africa and from Western, Central and Southern Asia.
The various French, American and Italian bases/ troops present in the country use drones to surveill the areas for migrant vessels and caravans, while their ships guard and patrol the coastal straits to assure migrants don't make it to mainland Europe.
Another factor in this coup is the potential role of the UAE who have been growing in terms of exerting varying forms of neocolonial influence over the region— attempts at installing puppet regimes to consolidate their interests, as seen recently in Sudan or Libya beforehand.
It's assumed at this point that they may be behind instigating this coup in Niger as part of their aspirations in recent years to exercise a soft control over the Sahel and its vast reserves of vital resources, mainly through the use of mercenaries and monetary channels.
Their strategy seeks to gain popular support amongst local factions by exploiting the anti-western sentiment prevalent; allowing them leverage when competing with the Chinese and Russian interests who they've thus far usually facilitated with business and geopolitical endeavors.
They've been active in influencing events in Sudan recently and have strong ties to Wagner and sponsoring other PMCs operating under the guise of security related activities. It's something to keep an eye on as this plays out over the coming weeks.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The closer your physical proximity to the west or your likeness to whiteness, the more sympathy and attention you're afforded. We figure so little in their psyches as opposed to how prevalent they are in ours. Yet I see the lengths they go to care for some, just not for us.
There's a hierarchical approach to how human life is perceived mainly because of how capitalism has historically indoctrinated us with a value-based means of understanding reality; and race intercedes heavily in determining one's place within that structure and how they're seen.
Meanwhile our homelands are suspended in a ceaseless spiral of constant grief and calamity. One thing after another. It's hard for us to quantify or express the grief from this trauma; the toll it takes or the anxieties we carry. That isn't how life is supposed to be for anyone.
Stop calling them sanctions and start calling it what it actually is; economic terrorism. From Afghanistan to Cuba, Syria to Iran and Yemen the US punishes people everyday for not aligning with its interests yet claims moral righteousness and that it values human life.
This has long been their imperialist ploy; where they stifle a country through embargoes and sanctions then point to the resulting suffering and devastation it causes as a reason to justify regime change- towards installing one that's more accommodating to their own agenda.
In instances where America targets a country for regime change, the narrative they run always makes it seem like sanctions or bombing them is solely about targeting/ harming a singular *evil* individual; Saddam or Castro or Assad, hence legitimizing it as a means.
People are watching that Kanye interview and saying stuff like "this isn't welcome in my America" or "my grandfather didn't fight the Nazis for this". America only saw it necessary to challenge Hitler after he was deemed to pose a threat to their own hegemonic ambitions + power.
Months before Hitler invaded Poland, when Nazi violence and state policies targeting Jews and minorities was already widely reported and known of in the West; over 20,000 Americans flooded Madison Square Garden to celebrate Nazism on February 20th, 1939.
They heralded it as a demonstration of *true Americanism* with the opening speaker remarking that if George Washington was alive then he'd have been friends with Adolf Hitler. The Star Spangled Banner opened the ceremony and the arena was decorated with Nazi and American symbols.
Just because Kanye's romanticizing and propagating Nazism, it doesn't absolve America of anything. Elements of the American elite openly funded and supported Hitler and his vision precisely because it happened to align with the white supremacism that America was built upon.
Fascism and imperialism are two sides of the same coin. The very idea of America was made possible through genociding and ethnically cleansing the land of its indigenous inhabitants in order to assure the dominance of whiteness and the continuation of the settler state.
America was the blueprint for fascist Germany. Hitler was so fascinated with how America institutionalized and codified racism in the Jim Crow South that he sought to replicate it. He sent lawyers to study the discriminatory American legal framework and its social application.
Andrew Tate and Jordan Peterson absolutely are two faces of the same coin. We're seeing how young men are particularly susceptible to their misogynistic ideologies for a reason and much of that has to do with the conceived notion they push forth that masculinity is in crisis.
We live in a time where there's a overwhelming collective feeling of constant dread and disillusionment bought about by late stage capitalism that for many has rendered life meaningless if not just devoid of purpose in much of what we're conditioned to find contentment in.
It's easy to latch onto these two individuals especially because they offer a scope and direction amidst confusion, insecurity that are rampant in the western collective psyche- where overstimulation and systemic trauma has opened up a glaring void for many men.