David Veevers Profile picture
Aug 1 21 tweets 7 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Superb work, especially by Ghanaian archeologists. Forts were key components of formal and organised European regimes of the trade in enslaved people. But it's also important to recognise that Anglo-British participation had a much longer history /1
bbc.co.uk/news/world-afr…
Even before Fort Kormantine (above) was built in 1630s, English captains and merchants had trafficked thousands of ppl from West & Central Africa across the Atlantic. Most were sold to Iberian colonies in Greater Antilles & South America. Many were captured from Iberian ships /2 Image
The English ships Treasurer and White Lion captured the Portuguese slaver San Juan Bautista in 1619, along with its human cargo of traumatised Ndongo ppl. The main investor in the White Lion was Samuel Argall, who had captured Matoaka, aka the Powhatan 'Pocahontas'. /3 Image
He'd also recently been governor of Jamestown, so the Ndongo were sent to Virginia to work the booming tobacco plantations - the first recorded transporting of enslaved ppl from Africa to North America. England's emerging empire was bound up with slavery from the get-go. /4 Image
But it was the Caribbean which became the hub of England's unorganised trade in enslaved ppl before the formal trafficking monopolies of companies such as the Royal African Company in the later C17th. By 1641, the English had trafficked 4,000 West Africans into the Caribbean. /5 Image
When we think of slavery in English Caribbean colonies, we think Barbados. But it was the island of Liamáiga - renamed St Christopher or 'St Kitts' by Europeans - which was the epicentre. After massacring 2,000 Indigenous Kalinago, English & French partitioned island in 1627. /6 Image
Tobacco was the chief crop of England's first Caribbean colony. But tobacco cultivation was labour intensive work, 'ffor in sowing, plantinge, weedinge, worminge, gatheringe, Curinge, and making up, it Consumes ten monthes [of the year] at least, yf not elevent.' /7 Image
To produce at scale with profitable margins, the small European population of St Kitts turned both to indentured labour from England and recently conquered Ireland, but also at the same time enslaved labour from Indigenous Kalinago and Americans. /8 Image
Attacks & occupation of other Kalinago islands, as well as the brutal Pequot War in New England, opened up sources of Indigenous enslaved labour for the English on St Kitts. These poured into the burgeoning English settlement of Old Town & its plantations on the leeward coast. /9 Image
The English colony became both a consumer of enslaved Indigenous labour, and an exporter. A thriving slave market was established at Old Road in Kalinago as well as 'the Cannibal Negroes from New England', with European merchants purchasing slaves for across the Atlantic. /10 Image
In 1627 when an English slave ship from St Kitts docked at Jamestown, the enslaved Kalinago escaped, fled into the forests, and waged war on the colony, raiding plantations, killing colonists, and then joined with the Indigenous Powhatans in their war against Jamestown. /11
Enslaved Indigenous people were increasingly joined by enslaved people from West Africa One typical 100 acre plantation on neighbouring Nevis in 1650s was worked by 4 indentured Irish servants but '33 negroes and Indians, great and small.' /12
In fact enslaved ppl from Africa were present from the foundation of the colony: 60 had been trafficked there by its leader Thomas Warner in 1626, chiefly to clear vegetation to make way for tobacco plantations. Within 10 years, their number ballooned to 600. /13 158
Recognising their increasing numbers, in 1636 a law was passed formally allowing enslaved ppl from Africa to be trafficked onto St Kitts. This was mirrored by the island's French settlements. But the growing numbers of enslaved were determined to resist. In 1637 they rose up. /14
In the first non-Spanish slave rebellion in the Caribbean, 500 mostly Senegalese people fled to the mountains and built a stronghold, harassing English & French plantations. A large French force eventually captured the fort, executed the leaders, and re-enslaved the rest. /15
When sugar cultivation reached St Kitts in late 1640s, decline of Kalinago population & need for greater pools of coerced labour to cultivate sugar led to explosion in the demographic of enslaved ppl from Africa. By end of C17th, enslaved Africans outnumbered colonists 2:1. /16 Image
But Africans in English colonies not just enslaved: successfully resisted & even took war to English. When English arrive in 1620s, already 1,000 'maroons' living amongst Kalinago - self-liberated slaves who fled Spanish colonies. Kalinago integrate them into their villages /17 Image
African maroons 'allied with the Caribs and live together' with Indigenous Kalinago communities. When English trafficked thousands more into Caribbean, swelled maroon numbers. On St Vincent, Kalinago numbers boomed due to 'a very large number of fugitive slaves from Barbados.'/18 Image
With a force of 1,500 Afro-Kalingo and 80 ships, unleashed war on English colonies. They burned plantations, freed enslaved ppl & took English captives. Unlike European chattel slavery, Kalinago adopted their captives into society, some of whom rose to prominent positions. /19 Image
Afro-Kalinago attacks were so effective that arc of English colonies, from Montserrat to Antigua, begged for help from London. The colonists complained that the Afro-Kalinago began 'lookinge on us as their tributaries'. By 1660 Europeans desperate for peace. /20
Anglo-French delegation signed treaty partitioning the Eastern Caribbean with Kalinago & promising to respect independence of Kalinago heartland. Another 100 years before this was destroyed, and by then millions of enslaved Africans had arrived and died in the Caribbean. Finis. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Veevers

David Veevers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidVeevers1

Jul 18
What did three chests of Italian pasta and an Ashanti drinking cup made out of the skull of a British general have in common? The defeat of the British Empire in West Africa, of course. Not familiar? Here's a short 🧵/1
In West Africa, the Ashanti had been expanding out from Kumasi in all directions since the late C17th. By the later C18th century, the Ashanti had emerged as the dominant polity in the region and began to consolidate its control over the Atlantic Coast./2 Image
This brought the Ashanti into conflict with the Fante, a confederation of kingdoms and communities whose power was augmented by its relationship with European traders, especially the British, whose forts dotted the 'Gold Coast' and principally dealt with the Fante./3 Image
Read 22 tweets
Jul 11
One of the key aims of my book is to challenge teleological narratives of the British Empire: yes, ultimately by the C19th, it managed to become hegemonic in many of the regions that had been a focus of its interests. But, if we write its history from that perspective.../1
...we strip those who encountered the British Empire of their agency and reduce them to passive and inevitable victims of colonialism. That was never the case in the early modern period, and that was certainly never the case once they became colonised by the modern period. /2
Some of my delightful critics have sneered at the book's conceptualisation as flawed because ultimately the British Empire did 'win'. First of all: how do we understand relationships of power if it often took decades or in some cases centuries to colonise states and societies? /3
Read 21 tweets
Jun 5
Empire apologists excuse away colonialism by arguing that we can’t judge the past by modern values - never mind that ppl have always condemned murder, slavery, and war. In fact there were plenty of contemporaries that did condemn colonialism then. /1
In Virginia in 1620, as a growing English colonial population waged war against the Indigenous Powhatans, displaced them from their land, and converted their children to Christianity, the chaplain George Thorpe confessed that they were doing wrong. He admitted that…/2
…his countrymen hurled ‘maledictions and bitter execrations’ at the Powhatans for no reason. The latter, he states, were of a ‘peaceable and virtuous disposition’, and ‘if there bee wrong on any side it is on ours’. When the Powhatans fought back, some colonists wrote…/3
Read 17 tweets
Apr 18
‘WhAt AbOuT tHe ArAb SlAvE tRaDeRs?!’ is another trope often deployed by those wishing to deflect from Europe’s role in the transatlantic trade in enslaved Africans, hoping to prioritise a narrative of European victimhood.

Let’s put this one under the microscope, shall we? 🧵
In the 250 yrs between 1530 to 1780, more than 1 million people fell victim to the corso slave trade. The corso was the maritime raiding war between Christian and Muslim powers that emerged in response to Ottoman expansion across the Mediterranean in this period. 1/
By mid-C16th, Maghreb in North Africa was assailed by Portuguese & Spanish attempts to seize coastal cities. Kingdoms of Tunis, Tlemcen, Marrakech and Fez buckled under attacks. Ottomans also coveted Muslim kingdoms there, but as 2000 miles from Constantinople 2/
Read 25 tweets
Apr 12
I see ‘well the English and Irish were also slaves in the Caribbean’ discourse has reared its head. Often trotted out as rebuttal to the horrors of the transatlantic trade in enslaved people from Africa in order to promote a false white victimhood, let’s demolish this myth: 🧵1/
Ireland was the first overseas English colony, and became the laboratory for the formation of colonial strategies of violence and atrocity against colonised people that would be deployed elsewhere in its nascent empire in the C16th & C17th 2/
In order to break Irish resistance against expansion of English political authority and territorial rule, brutal wars against Kildares in Leinster, Desmonds in Munster, and O’Neills in Ulster decimated those regions. As Irish forces were often hard to defeat, especially 3/
Read 24 tweets
Apr 10
'BuT wHaT aBoUt ThE aFriCaN sLaVeRs?!' - is the immediate response of those uneducated on the transatlantic trade in enslaved people from Africa (see, also: racists & imperial apologists). So let's do a bit of an examination on the relationship between Britain and Africans🧵 1/
When we want to discuss Britain's role, we are predominantly talking about West Africa & so-called 'Slave Coast'', 250 mile stretch of coast along the Bight of Benin. Here, peoples like the Fon and states like Allada, Ouida, Benin, & Dahomey engaged in international trade. 2/
From C16th, kingdoms & communities here exported fine woven cloth & manufactures, palm oil, food, even gold. Thriving markets & prosperous towns & cities attracted merchants from across Africa & Europe. Early European visits recorded 'its Commerce was in a Flourishing state'. 3/
Read 38 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(