Jingna Zhang Profile picture
Aug 2 11 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Indies using AI will impact more jobs than you think. Let’s discuss 3 scenarios:

In illustration, many junior-mid lvl artists make a living freelancing w/ indie authors, publishers, tabletop games, musicians. The pay is limited, but it’s a living. And AI is taking that away: 1/
To simplify, say a picture book pays $100/page x 12pgs. Artist takes 3 days per page, project takes 1.5-2mths. They earn $1.2k & pay some rent. If all indie author/creator decide to generate images, gigs dry up. Tens of thousands of artists in this market go out of work. 2/
You might say, then get new job training for these tens of thousands of ppl—ok, sure, but these aren’t the only people affected.

Let’s look at scenario 2, where even more people are impacted in a project that gets automated—photography. 3/
I’ll talk about higher end photo productions, cuz that’s what will replace smaller creators. You’ll see why in a moment.

In these productions, smaller photoshoots can hire between 10-15 people, bigger projects can be 40+. My projects fall between 15-40. 4/
I spend a lot of my time producing, and I know regardless of commercial or personal work, I spend the same amount of time working. So I don’t take private commissions cuz I don’t have more time, bandwidth, or want to work at a discount. But AI can change that, IF I wanted. 4/
IF I wanted to, I could build an AI photography pipeline. People who wanted my name on their pictures and couldn’t before, can now start purchasing AI photoshoots “from the studio of Jingna Zhang”. 5/
Let’s say 1k AI shoots are sold a year. This means removing 1k gigs from other portrait photographers. But not only them. It also means -1k makeup artists, -1k hair stylists, -1k stylists, -2~3k assistants, -1k producers, set designers, food biz you get lunch at, per year. 6/
It might create jobs for 3-5 part timers who will help run these programs & reply to emails to keep up with demand. But the price of this one indie creator using gen AI has the power to eliminate 6-10k gigs from the market. Just one person. 7/
So in a limited scenario of just these 2 small industries, people are going to bleed jobs en masse. And they can’t get job training for something else, cuz it’s going to be the same everywhere—every industry will shed more jobs than what will be created. 8/
Like illustration, the impact of AI in photo will land on young & mid-career workers most.

So many established artists are not doing the example I gave above but are instead speaking up because we don’t want to see our craft go extinct, or the next gen have nowhere to go. 9/
So when I see people say “gen AI will benefit indies”, I call bullshit. It’s really just saying to me, “I don’t want to pay workers & I only care about myself.”

You CAN just care about yourself if you want! But don’t pretend it’s a benefit when it has real power to cause harm.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jingna Zhang

Jingna Zhang Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @zemotion

Aug 1
Gen AI will remove jobs at a higher rate than it can create. One of few ways forward is for gvnts to tax those that use AI. So if much of workforce is eliminated, there can be social support for most of society who’ll have no jobs. If not taxed, AI only benefit corporations. 1/
Eroding the protection of hiring people is often the first step. I was at an event recently where someone is developing AI to replace a job protected by trade org or union (not my field, so not 100% sure), and they’re counting on government to soften regulations with lobbying. 2/
The plan is that company will sell AI as tool to assist users, train an AI based on how users carry out their jobs in negotiating & what they look for, and “When regulations are AI-friendly in a few years, and the AI is well trained, we can eliminate this job from existence.” 3/
Read 11 tweets
Dec 23, 2022
I want to be transparent about why I'm building @Cara_HQ, and why it's more than just an ArtStation alternative.

The future and impact of AI art. A thread 👇 1/
First off, the unethical issues with AI art need to be resolved by law and legislation. But once it has, AI art will become a fixture in production in multiple industries and significantly change the way art is created and consumed. 2/
This is going to be bleak but sit with me.

My estimates for the near future:

If nothing changes, I expect 60-80% of the artist workforce to lose their jobs in the next 2-5 years—not to prompters—just to company bottom lines. 3/
Read 16 tweets
Dec 23, 2022
I don’t know how our society managed to evolve to a point where so many can feel entitled to rob others' hard work and feel justified doing so.
All the AI bros cheering that artists will lose their jobs—how can they not realize that many of them too, will lose theirs?

Very few jobs will be safe from automation.
I've anticipated losing my job to AI for 6yrs now. I anticipated style-replication to be accessible by 2021. I'm only a year off.

It just never once crossed my mind that I should be... happy? That other people are going to lose their jobs??!
Read 5 tweets
Dec 7, 2022
I am devastated by the copyright ruling in Luxembourg today, which stated that my work lacks originality and therefore will not receive copyright protection in Luxembourg.

The basis of the ruling being that the model’s pose in my photo is not unique. 1/ Image
But how can a photo’s copyright be based on a pose alone?

If having a unique pose is the premise for copyright protection of an image, then nearly all portrait works in the world will not have copyright protection. 2/
The fact that my work has been copied by others countless times is a testament to its originality and style—including in this particular case, where it’s been exploited by the violator for a painting that won an award, exhibited, and was offered for sale for €6,500. 3/ ImageImage
Read 18 tweets
Jun 1, 2022
Some guy really ripped off my photo, won a €1,500 prize, exhibited in a biennale supported by the Luxembourg government, then tried to mansplain copyright infringement to me. Where can I find a Luxembourgish speaker to help? Unbelievable. instagram.com/p/CeQGjPru65e/ Image
@gouv_lu @kult_min @CityLuxembourg Strassen Commune, the organizer, has deleted the IG post announcing the winners instead of contacting me directly.

They were cc'ed in this guy's email to me explaining how this work wasn't copyright infringement. I'm not sure if that means they basically plan to do nothing.
@gouv_lu @kult_min @CityLuxembourg People spotted more copies this guy made of other people's photos. My situation wasn't the only time:
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(