Thank you for the influx of followers, Tottenham fans.
As a result, I want to do another thread discussing the season, and what setup you could use to challenge for the title.
The title? Yes, the title. Your manager is that good. You are dark horses in my eyes.
THREAD
I think Ange is an amazing coach. Top 3 in the league, alongside Guardiola and Arteta. I remember when Manchester City played Yokohama in a friendly a few years ago, guess who had more possession? Yokohama managed by Ange Postecogolou. One of the only 4 managers in history to outposess Pep. On top of that, the manager to start using the 4 Inverted Fullback formation also much before Guardiola.
Now let's start.
To put it frankly, Tottenham have THE best attack in the league. They have the best striker in the league, the best left winger in the league, and one of the best creative wingers in the league - Kulusevski. A good attack alone is enough to challenge for a Top 4 spot, which we've seen for many years despite Tottenham's mediocrity in other positions.
And one thing Tottenham have always lacked since the departure of Eriksen and decline of Dele Alli is a centrally creative player to help bolster this attack even further. That was until they made one of the best signings of the past decade - James Maddison.
Before, all attacks relied on a Perisic cross, or Kane having to drop deep. But Maddison adds a whole new dynamic. Obviously, a manager like Ange would not want to waste Kane's creativity. And that's why he would play Maddison as a 2nd striker.
We saw in 21/22 when Tottenham played Manchester City. There were reports saying Manchester City player's in the dressing room had no idea how to handle Kane dropping deep. Now, add Maddison to this. Whilst Kane drops deep, Maddison has the license to advance. Whilst Maddison drops deep, Kane has the license to advance.
This is similar to what we saw with the Kane-Dele dynamic, and look how well that worked. With Kulusevski acting as essentially a right sided 8 with license to drive forward. Again, similar to Eriksen under Pochettino.
And this dynamic of Kane-Maddison-Kulusevski is honestly something I think is able to replicate the system of the Tottenham "glory days". And Ange is the perfect manager to utilise it.
Let's not forget about Son, a player that can either stay wide, drag out players, or drift more centrally. Similarly, the alternating roles of Kane and Maddison can create space, allowing Son to make his lethal runs in behind or find gaps in the defense to place his shots.
The main issue with Tottenham's set up right now is the lack of good full backs. The players you have are catered towards a wingback system, and simply are too attacking to succeed right off the bat for Ange. And as a result, I think Ange is forced to play a 3-4-3, similar to Guardiola.
I think when fit, Bentancur should be that man who drifts from a 6/8 in possession to the right back position out of possession. On the ball, he's elite. Off the ball, he's elite. And until he recovers - I think this position should be played by Skipp. He is the only one who has the defensive capabilities as well as the on the ball quality to play such a role.
As for the rest of midfield, I do think Ange has a big arsenal to choose from, but it's tough to say what's the best. Ndombele, Lo Celso, Bissouma, Bentancur, even Hojbjerg in a double 6 would be very good.
For balance sake: I would say Lo Celso-Bissouma is the way to go. Lo Celso is a very elegant player. There's a key reason why some people call him one of most Argentina's important players, look at the reaction when he was injured in the world cup.
Lo Celso is a great ball carrier, and also has a very good knick for threading through delicate passes through tight gaps. I very much see him being able to play a similar role to what David Silva did to Manchester City, and Maddison-Lo Celso could create a similar dynamic to that of De Bruyne-Silva.
So my second dilemma was picking between Hojbjerg and Bissouma. The former, elite ball winner, and I think without fatigue and exhaustion, he would excel in this setup. But I think he is on his way out.
Bissouma, however, also elite. His on the ball tendencies are much better than Hojbjerg's, so I think he will fit in well to this system.
And I think the centre half pairing really picks itself. Van De Van with his insane ability to track back and his recovery pace will allow Ange to play a lot more aggressively, whilst Romero is there to progress play with his elite ball playing.
The final issue is left back - I would honestly choose Ben Davies, but after some thought, I think Udogie provides good width on that left flank. It allows Son to cut inside, allowing him to get good angles for shots, whilst also providing another attacking outlet.
Ben Davies can be utilised for teams you maybe don't want to be so attacking against, like your Manchester United's who aim to play off the counter.
Tottenham have the best attack in the league. After Manchester City, Arsenal, and Manchester United, probably have the best midfield in the league. And also have a Top 3 manager in the league, alongside Arteta and Guardiola. The only issue is the fullback situation, which is unfortunate, but we will see how it works out. If they suffer this season - it's largely due to the lack of competent fullbacks for such a system.
Final Lineup:
I cannot respond to everyone, but I do want to say I am very grateful for the positive feedback. From the bottom of my heart, thank you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ryan Mason has potential to become one of the greatest English coaches of all time.
He has the tactical foundations required to transform West Bromwich Albion into one of the best teams in The Championship, and have them back in The Premier League.
THREAD.
Ryan Mason has learned from Pochettino, Conte, Mourinho, and Postecoglou.
3 all time greats, and another brilliant manager.
This knowledge alone is what most players DREAM of. He's been exposed to multiple styles of football, both attacking (Pochettino, Postecoglou), and more defensive (Conte, Mourinho).
And both these styles are very apparent in what we have seen from him so far.
It is quite clear that Mason's biggest inspiration is not from Mourinho or Conte, but Pochettino. Right now, it is difficult to know how much Ange Postecoglou has inspired him, due to limited postmortem knowledge.
But he large giveaway his style reflects more of Pochettino is his pressing patterns, and more positive philosophy of football in general.
Thomas Frank is one of the best managers not only in The Premier League, but also the WORLD.
Here is how he can create a dynasty at Tottenham, and build off of the glory in Bilbao.
A tactical breakdown on Thomas Frank, and how his ideas will translate to Tottenham.
THREAD.
Thomas Frank much before any sort of Tottenham link is someone who I called a Top 5 manager in the league, and one of the best in the world.
So no, before you try insinuate that I am a Tottenham fan, I spoke of him highly much before Tottenham links.
It just happens that he is now employed by Tottenham. Perfect!
What Thomas Frank did was take a midtable Championship side into a Premier League side challenging for EUROPE.
All in just under 7 years. On a shoestring budget.
And do you know how a manager is TRULY great? They got it out of the mud. They didn't need any nepotism. Any handouts. The reason they're at the top is because of the brilliance of their tactical brain, nothing more.
Much like Postecoglou, Frank was not a recognised footballer with established connections in the industry. He had to work his way up.
Bayern Munich today face their biggest task yet. Their most difficult task yet.
Simone Inzaghi's Inter Milan.
A chance to get one step closer to The Champions League Final in Munchen. At home.
Here is a tactical insight into how they should lineup, and predictions.
THREAD
Simone Inzaghi is one of the best coaches in Europe. His combination of compact football, and emphasis on defensive structure, without being afraid to control tempo, and also push forward to attack is hard.
Especially in a European setting, this style and shape matches up incredibly well against "modern" teams.
However, his system fundamentally relies on the quality of the fullbacks to be able to stretch oppositions in attack.
The issue for Inzaghi? Both Denzel Dumfries and now, after writing this, Federico Dimarco are out.
Huge.
Inzaghi's system revolves around the wingbacks being able to stretch the pitch. Otherwise very fluid, with a lot of positional rotation amongst the central players, it at times can become very rigid and claustraphobic.
That is why the wingbacks are so, so crucial. Because even though these rotations can disrupt opposition central structure, that's not possible without the use of quality, dynamic wingbacks to stretch the pitch and discourage opponents from playing narrow and counteracting this.
In 2025, 3 talents that have the potential to be the sport's biggest superstars for the next decade will be joining Chelsea.
Estevao Willian, Kendry Paez, and Aaron Anselmino.
— An analysis on each player. Strengths, weaknesses.
— Their best role in Maresca's system. Maximising said strengths, minimising weaknesses.
— Future development plans.
THREAD
2025 will be a terrifying year for the league.
Guardiola's potentially last season, Phase 3 Postecoglou, and the most terrifying of them all?
Maresca's Chelsea with 3 generational talents in the midst.
Can you imagine if Chelsea do go all the way this season, and compete for the title until the very end - how TERRIFYING Phase 2 Maresca would be?
Making an already strong squad with versatile profiles even stronger.
And the most important thing is none of these players are "luxury", they are either signings in the areas Chelsea desperately need, or at the very least unique profiles that Chelsea appreciate.
That is what makes them especially terrifying. This is not like Real Madrid signing Mbappe.
This is like if Manchester City had signed Mohamed Salah after winning the treble.
— Estevao provides Chelsea an immense player in their weakest 2 attacking areas (RW/Right 8).
— Paez provides the same.
— Anselmino also addresses Chelsea's weakest area, centre back depth.
It is the biggest game of the Maresca era. One that could cement Chelsea as title challengers.
It is also the biggest game of the Arteta era. One that could put his job at risk, if lost.
How will this game play out? How can MAresca win? tactical analysis and deep dive.
THREAD
The quality of football that Arsenal play has significanty diminished over the past year. They are not that free flowing, high pressing, high pressure sustaining team they were a year ago.
Around February, things went downhill. And recent results are a sign of that.
Arteta's system has shifted to a hybrid of a mid/lowblock, and he has began putting excess emphasis on duels/duel proficiency. He has garnered an obsession with strong defensive prowess.
And this is great in practice, but not so much on paper.
Whilst Bukayo Saka is a brilliant talent, and has shown unreal consistency throughout the past few years - he simply does not compare to Cole Palmer (nor does any other active English talent).
Here are 5 areas Palmer excels at in comparison to Saka.
MINITHREAD.
1. Movement.
Cole Palmer has the movement and instinct of a world class 9. Dare I say, after Erling Haaland - he has the 2nd best movement/positioning in the entire world.
Bukayo Saka is rather static, he doesn't find himself in these goal scoring positions as often. Feel like Bukayo Saka's game stems from muscle memory more than initiative - and when a player lacks this element of positional sense/movement, I think it is quite indicative.
Cole Palmer has this fearlessness, takes up responsibility of being the team's primary creator and goal scorer. Movement either finds space for himself, or creates space for others. Large reason why Jackson has been so productive is that movement combination with Cole Palmer.
2. Creativity.
Bukayo Saka is one of the most creators players in the world, I agree. But Cole Palmer is the best.
Like I said - a lot of Saka's game feels more like muscle memory than iniative. It is like he is precoded. And that is why he is so good at what he does, but as a a result, he suffers in comparison to someone like Cole Palmer who is much more inventive than Saka.
Saka's creativity usually comes from elite crossing/cutbacks - Palmer is much more varied. Lobs into the box, through balls/line breakers, crosses, clever 1-2s. Expansive. Harder to contain - you can't force him onto his weak foot to generate a weaker cross, because he will just find another way to create.