Read on Twitter
Framing, as always, is in the details.
Look which word is in quotes ["we're keeping our distance from this"] in the subhead: Lies.
Look which term is presented straight ["no need to question or caveat this"]: Free speech.
This can only come from decades of working-the-refs.
Look which word is in quotes ["we're keeping our distance from this"] in the subhead: Lies.
Look which term is presented straight ["no need to question or caveat this"]: Free speech.
This can only come from decades of working-the-refs.
2/2
And they absolutely went with it on the inside page.
Essay question: How does this differ from the way Fox would have framed the news? Or Trump's own team?
And they absolutely went with it on the inside page.
Essay question: How does this differ from the way Fox would have framed the news? Or Trump's own team?
3/
And while I am at it, on framing:
Lead story on front page of NYT one week ago.
Essay question: Compare with
"Old OJ Habit Is Seen at Heart of New Charges."
"Old KKK Habit Is Seen at Heart of New Charges."
And while I am at it, on framing:
Lead story on front page of NYT one week ago.
Essay question: Compare with
"Old OJ Habit Is Seen at Heart of New Charges."
"Old KKK Habit Is Seen at Heart of New Charges."
4/
To underscore a point well known in journalism but not so much in civilian world:
99% of the time, the issue w NYT framing is headlines, subheds, "social sells"—presentation on Xitter et al.
Rather than stories themselves.
Alas, 99x more people just see the headlines.
To underscore a point well known in journalism but not so much in civilian world:
99% of the time, the issue w NYT framing is headlines, subheds, "social sells"—presentation on Xitter et al.
Rather than stories themselves.
Alas, 99x more people just see the headlines.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
