🧵on the Cattar or Cathiar. The Cathiar were Brahmin war bands found throughout Kerala and Tamil Nadu as well as the rest of Southern India, where they were referred to as ghatam/kalam.
The Cathiar would take up arms for their respective kings. However upon defeat of their liege lord, they could be incorporated into the new kingdom. At times, they entered into political disputes, choosing the kings of the Cheras and Pallavas, or even founded kingdoms
in the case of the Kadambas. To join the Cathiar, one had to be proficient in the Vedas and had to be certified by 5 current members that the candidate was proficient in Vaiyakarna, Mimamsa and Purohita.
They were prohibited from bringing arms into gatherings, playing dice within the temple and from keeping concubines within the Matha. In the Kuvalayamala, the Cathiar are described as large men with upturned mustaches and undressed hair.
The Cathiar were also characters in contemporary literature, always depicted armed and engaging in courtly and religious festivals. Even attempting to impress courtesans with their bloody weapons, martial prowess and scholarship.
The headquarters of the respective Cathiar band included a temple, residences for the men and lands farmed by tenants, who passed up parts of their produce and resources to the Cathiar. If the peasants failed to provide the correct amount, the Cathiar had the right
to restrain their property and cultivation.
Did such a practice exist within Northern India as well? Perhaps…the Nagas of the Dasnami Sampradayas, Ramanandis and Dadupanthis operated in very similar ways. Additionally we have evidence of similar activities in Madhya Pradesh. So some form of this institution
This thread will be the first amongst many that document the regularized violence in the feudal Gangetic plain from the late Middle Ages to early modern period.
Zamindari power was virtually unchanged from 1595 to the annexation of Oudh by Johnny Company in 1858. The establishment and maintenance of it depended heavily upon armed power, as violence is the
ultimate denominator of power, especially in a place as unstable as the North Indian plain.
An archetypical example of the establishment of such fiefdoms. The Dom tribals of Gorakhpore and its
environs were subjugated by migratory Rajpoots, who then held the lands, until they too were similarly conquered by Rajputs of Kacchar.
As an aside, it was common for feudatories in the Eastern Gangetic Basin being established via the
overthrowal of local kingdoms ruled by tribals, which often functioned in a similar manner to those
ruled by caste Hindus. These conquests usually took the form of a band of itinerant warriors setting
out and conquering new fiefs from the tribals, then inviting more of their clansmen to settle. Many
modern Dalit castes of this region such as Doms, Pasis, Bhars, Musahars, and others are descended
from these erstwhile ruling tribes. The Cheros remained the last great tribal kingdom until its final
overthrowal by the Ujjainiya Rajputs of western Bihar. The Bhars ruled a large tract from
Gorakhpore to Bundelkhand, but were overthrown by various warbands of Rajputs.
An overview on Warrior Ascetics in Early Modern India…. Part 1
The Indian subcontinent has long been the home of many orders of ascetics, known as sadhus or Sannyasis. Among the most famous of these orders were the Dasnamis, and by the 17th century, its sadhus had become a militarized group, with various bands of armed monks, or Nagas (lit. naked) attached to these sects.
This occurred with many different sects of Sadhus in addition to the Dasnamis, and there are thus different kinds of Nagas as well.
The Dasnami Nagas were organized into 6 broad akharas or regiments, the date of foundation for these regiments is unknown save for a testament from a document by one monastery from the 19th century, though it cannot be corroborated. There were also numerous akharas that formed via fission of extant akharas under the leadership of former chelas, or acolytes, of Mahants (gosain leaders) who split away and formed their own regiments after the deaths of their mahants. These usually lasted as long as their founders.
Among the earliest accounts of fighting ascetics in India is from romantic courtly literature, in this case the Harścarita of Banabhatta from the 7th century, where a group of tantric yogis with “warlike temperaments” enter the service of the King Pushpabhuti as warriors. Later on, we find accounts and inscriptions from Śaiva Siddhanta monasteries in 12th century southern India detailing how these monasteries had arsenals of weapons, and that its luminaries were skilled in arms and carried out such martial vocations as to win them wide acclaim.
Indian civilization has always been more decentralized comparatively than say Chinese civilization, which always had a stronger autocratic element and a philosophical inclination towards unification. The strong aristocratic culture of India, girded on by notions of Indo-European
tripartite societal organization, led to a weakening of central authority even prior to the decentralization and parcellization of power in the Gupta and post Gupta age, when feudalism properly began in India. The endemic warfare and notions of freedom of this rural aristocracy
which itself shifted in composition and identity as new warrior groups carved out fiefdoms for themselves, lasted into the early modern era. Even at the height of the Moghul empire, there was no way to properly impose imperial authority beyond city centers, as the country side
lifestyles from our grandfathers. Even belonging to the leisure class at the time required considerable walking…so life was more physical in general. My grandfathers belonged to such a class. They would walk/ride everywhere and play Kabaddi for fun…most
people who are posting on X do not live a similar lifestyle. For the people of the past, health wasn’t much of a concern because their lifestyle had an in built “tolerance” for unhealthy food…you’d just burn it off.
In India, hero cults mainly focus on local heroes engaging in or repulsing a cattle raid. This is because cattle raiding in pre modern India was the most conspicuous way to become a hero on the local rural level.
A cattle raid brought wealth to your community, but also, more importantly, humiliated your rivals. In India, the title of a “cow protector” was an important title with deep significance that did not just relate to protecting cattle from slaughter, but also from raids.
A man who died, repulsing a cattle raid would often be deified by his local community and worshipped through various rites. These rites could include anything from standard worship rituals to forms of trances, and varied from region to region.
There’s a new controversy on Twitter today about the physiques of Ancient Greek soldiers. My take is that they obviously weren’t unfit, but at the same time they wouldn’t have looked like bodybuilders. They probably had physiques similar to old school athletes.
Most might have looked like these guys from the Harvard Wrestling team from 1938.