kyle alex brett Profile picture
Aug 7, 2023 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Alright.

Last thread.

This one is on the basics of “shot-reverse-shot”, “single shots” and “over-the-shoulder shots”.

If you’re filming a shot of a person and a shot of who they’re engaged with.

That’s called “shot”/“reverse shot”.


Image
Image
Image
Image
When you’re covering dialogue through shot-reverse-shot, you can do it in “single shots”.

Which is what it sounds like.

A single actor in frame at a time.

To me, that can cause some distance between the characters, in part, because we can’t see how close they are.
Image
Image
But, that makes sense here.

Hitchcock uses “single shots” in shot-reverse-shot as Marion and Sam talk about the impossibility of their love affair.

There’s a distance between them.

Almost like a border.

Then, watch how Hitchcock smashes that border with a “two-shot”.
But, single shots aren’t the only way to cover dialogue through shot-reverse-shot.

You can cover dialogue through shot-reverse-shot. But, instead of single shots, you use over-the-shoulder shots.

That just refers to camera placement.

To me, it accentuates their “closeness”.
Image
Image
So, here.

Hitchcock wants to emphasize how invasive this guy is because he wants us to not feel bad that Marion steals his money.

So, he positions them close, and shoots over-the-shoulder.

Think how different “single shots” might feel here.

Think low and high angles too.
Brief aside.

An over-the-shoulder shot invites us to think we’re right there, spying on what’s happening.

That’s why it feels “close”.

But, single shots invite us to wonder what the reverse shot looks like.

That wonder gets felt as a border between the images.
But.

Just because “over-the-shoulder shots” make actors feel close.

That doesn’t mean “single shots” can’t as well.

Here, the actors are as close as the last and it’s covered (not in over-the-shoulder-shots but) in singles.

Yet, we still feel that border.
Now watch.

Norman talked about his taxidermy hobby and is now telling Marion a creepy belief.

Hitchcock covers it in “singles”.

That border.

But, as soon Marion questions Norman’s “mother” (spoiler: Norman)

watch Hitchcock move Norman across that border like a chess piece.
Hitchcock covers the dialogue between Norman and Marion through shot-reverse-shot and in single shots.

Then, switches to a “low angle” side profile of Norman to suggest (1) he’s somehow suddenly become more powerful, and (2) without moving, he’s somehow crossed that border. Image
In these three threads, we’ve said.

CAMERA LOW, POINTED HIGH: actor looks powerful.
CAMERA HIGH, POINTED LOW: actor look powerless.

DUTCH ANGLE: makes us feel disoriented.

DOLLIES: can increase intensity.
ZOOM: can give more information.

SINGLES: can create distance. Image
And now here it is.

All of those techniques coming together in maybe the most iconic scene in cinema history.

If you stuck around for all three threads and found them interesting, I hope this scene feels new for you.

And that you’ve found a new way to consider film.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with kyle alex brett

kyle alex brett Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kyalbr

Jun 20
If I owned a chain of movie theaters like AMC, I'd spend a lot of time trying to figure out how I could do live screenings of NBA and NFL games and episodes of shows like Love Island with happy hour prices on drinks and snacks.
The complaint that people don't go to the movie theaters and support great, original movies is too much of a victim mindset.

The first question should be: how do we get audiences to remember and feel that watching movies in a crowd is a fun behavior they should do more often.
I would also try hard to figure out how to replace the television commercials with movie trailers.

Am I saying that I would play the trailer of Bring Her Back to a rowdy and drunk crowd of people who came to see the latest Love Island episode?

Yes.

Yes, I am saying that.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 12
It’s a shame the Civil Rights Era is always discussed like talking point and not like brilliant psychological warfare.

No one has waged a more effective internal insurgency against a global superpower without using material force than African-Americans did from 1950 to 1970.
The Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act are such insane accomplishments that will never be duplicated again in scale or scope and will remain unmatched.

Obama's election transferred a lot of power to one person.

The Acts transferred a lot of power to millions.
The Acts formally banned discrimination and segregation in public places, schools, employment, funding, voting and enforced the 15th amendment.

I genuinely do not think we could convince Congress to buy every American a sandwich.
Read 10 tweets
Apr 21
The psychoanalysis of Sinners is that there's twins inside Coogler and both want to entertain his community.

But, after success and pleasing his ancestors, he fears that vampires have now come to exploit him.

The problem is that his community are entertained by the vampires.
It's a big Hollywood film that's currently entertaining his community and the racist, previous owner of the juke joint is named "Hogwood."

I feel like Sinners is a personal, exploration of his uncertainty with becoming an event filmmaker.

What does success invite in?
Spoiler.

But, you realize the entire fiasco really started because Stack allowed Mary to go outside and try to get some of the vampire money.

If he had just been content with the plantation money, maybe none of this happens?

What does greed invite in?
Read 6 tweets
Dec 24, 2024
The thing that keeps fascinating me about Wicked (2024) is that it’s obviously an extremely racial story but many people don’t think it is.

It’s fascinating to see this scale of cognitive dissonance and shows why it’s near impossible to have a meaningful discourse on race.
It’s like there’s some great divide between people who understand symbolism, allusions, metaphors, subtext and those who just don’t.

And what’s even stranger is that when you tell people there’s hidden meaning, they almost seem to get mad at you.

This applies everywhere.
At a very granular level.

I think this boils down to your instinctive reaction when someone tells you that you’re wrong.

Do you immediately think they’re wrong?

Or, do you genuinely want to learn if they’re right?

That divide determines everything.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 26, 2024
Re-watched The Invitation (2015).

It probably should be considered one of the greatest horror movies ever.

A man and his girlfriend are invited to a dinner party hosted by his ex-wife and and attended by their old friends. Image
That movie is such a tense exploration of an extremely important social question:

What is the exact line in polite company which will cause you to become impolite?

It’s easy to say it’s a bright line.

But, most people will let their bright lines get crossed. Image
I think everyone is always trying to calculate the amount of discomfort for being impolite

vs.

the pain of just suffering until it’s over.

Usually the latter (suffering) is cheaper than the former (discomfort).

But, the threat of death makes discomfort extremely cheap. Image
Read 7 tweets
Oct 18, 2024
One of the more surreal parts of reality is how many people have deeply held beliefs that would completely collapse under minor questioning in a courtroom.
I really do think the point of no return for America was when we decided that the opinion of an average person and the opinion of an expert were equally valid.
In hindsight.

WebMD and the idea that you could diagnose a situation by quickly looking online might’ve been the beginning of the end.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(