It's as close to official as we'll probably get: LK-99 is likely simply a ferromagnetic material, which explains its levitating properties, according to new research from Peking University.
The room temperature superconductivity revolution will have to wait another day.
Guo et. al synthesized #LK99 with the published methodology and matched the material composition to the original using X-Ray Diffraction. They observed levitation in the sample and conducted a litany of other tests.
Their findings conclusively prove that their sample (which seems similar in many respects to LK-99) is NOT a superconductor. In fact, it's one of the least encouraging (and cleanest) resistivity plots we've seen so far.
So why does it (half) float? The authors describe it simply: "We therefore conclude that the half levitation is caused
by a magnetic torque, rather than by a net lifting force exerted on the sample."
Congratulations on a likely conclusive piece of research to Kaizhen Guo, Yuan Li, and Shuang Jia at Peking University. This is how science works!
I encourage you to read their excellent paper for yourself and see if you come to the same conclusion. arxiv.org/abs/2308.03110
For me, it's on to coffee! I have a great story coming up about the hardest test I've ever taken - the Q Coffee Grader. I hope you enjoy, and we'll still get to discuss interesting new topics in science and physics regularly!
WE'RE BACK:
* Diamagnetism is pretty rare and the Meissner effect is a key way to measure SC in a bulk heterogenous material
* We've seen multiple ~confirmations of diamagnetism
* DFT calculations are good (small update)
IT'S OVER:
* Still no good resistivity data; HUST and Lee et. al are extremely inconclusive
* The hypothesized crystal structure may be extremely unstable/impossible
* Diamagnetism is totally possible without SC and in fact we've seen it before in USOs (unidentified SC objcts)
For an interesting opinion on why floating is a valuable signal:
Well, here we have it! The first claimed replication of zero resistance in LK-99. As with the original pre-prints, the results are presented unconventionally (in a livestream on bilibili, a Chinese video sharing site). A few important caveats and notes in the thread
1. The Tc is not room temperature! It's 100 K, approx -279 ºF. 2. The shape of this resistivity graph is pretty weird. You'd expect a discontinuous drop straight down, rather than a curve down. 3. 1E-5 ≠ 0! Although it may be within measurement error.
4. The authors did not observe levitation or other strong diamagnetic properties, which they attribute to impurities in the samples. 5. All the usual caveats: these results are nowhere near published (literally just a youtube video), nor reviewed, and could be unreliable.
1. Twitter anon @iris_IGB claims to have made the floating rock, people are getting excited 2. @eirifu has a great tracker of replication efforts (linked below) 3. The replication probability on @ManifoldMarkets is up to 28%
@iris_IGB floats rock (still could be diamagnetism, but would be 10x stronger diamagnetism than graphite)