This book was the BIBLE in Grad School. It’s incredibly in depth and dense, but not so much that you can’t get through it. It’s comprehensive, well written, and is my go to reference to understand a ML algo more deeply😍
📗Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R
A gentler cousin of ESL, ISLR (and now ISLP!) is an great intro to ML algos. This book can be appreciated by undergrads, grads, and industry workers alike. The code examples are incredibly useful, and text is clear
(I dont currently assign a required textbook in my course, but if I ever do, it’s ISLP 100%)
📘Deep Learning
Not for the faint of 🫀! Like ESL, DL is a DENSE BOOK. There are chapters I’ve read half a dozen times and I’m still learning more each time. This book saved my 🍑 in grad school over and over. And I go to it often when prepping my deep learning course.
📙Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
This book DIGS INTO the math, and yet remains clear and has a great flow. ML Math can be intimidating but this book takes you by the hand and says “look, you have to learn this but I’m going to help”
📕Generative Deep Learning
Unlike the previous entries, this book isn’t a comprehensive reference book, it’s a gentle and clear intro to generative deep learning models. I read it to recommend to my undergrads and it’s perfect for them. It’s clear and has great figures.
📗Tidy Modeling With R
Julia Silge and @topepos have DONE IT AGAIN. I had the honor of tech reviewing this book and it is gold cover to cover. If you’re doing ML in R, you must read this book. They explain things so well, and their graph game is unmatched. Just, gorgeous content
@topepos 📘Statistical Rethinking
My emotional support textbook 🥹 @rlmcelreath has a way of writing that makes you EXCITED about what he’s saying. From basic causality to Bayesian stuff, he makes you go “i can’t wait to use this tool”. Bayesians and non-Bayesians alike will enjoy.
@topepos @rlmcelreath 📙Regression and Other Stories
This book is such a joy to read. You want to deeply understand regression? This is the book. I often go to this when consulting because it helps me explain models to my clients😍 these are the ideas and models that social scientists NEED to know
@f2harrell is the G.O.A.T. This book is like an encyclopedia for all the regression models you’re dying to use in your work. From ordinal models, to survival analysis…this book has it all. And endless case studies to see them in action.
@topepos @rlmcelreath @f2harrell 📕How to Ace Calculus: the Streetwise Guide
This book saved me in college calculs *mumbles* years ago. It’s silly, it’s clear, it makes learning calculus few FUN. This type of book really molded my scicomm style🥹
@topepos @rlmcelreath @f2harrell 📗Bayesian Data Analysis
This book is Jam packed with Bayesian goodness. It’s not the first book I’d give to a newbie, but it’s the book I think every practitioner should have on their desk if they’re going to use Bayesian Models. It has everything you want to know and 10% more
@topepos @rlmcelreath @f2harrell 📘Think Like a Progammer
If you’re learning C++ but are already familiar with a higher level language like python or R, this will help you wrap your brain around some lower level concepts (wtf is a pointer and how does it relate to an asterisk?!?)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We want a confidence interval for a two-sample z test! We're interested in the difference between replication rates for projects with and without open data.
This question has answer choices, so let's talk about my FAVORITE WAY to save time on these Qs!
FIRST: take a look at what's different between the answer choices. Here, the differences are:
- the critical z value
- the formula for calculating the standard error
so we don't even need to look at the other parts, they're all the same!
Let's start with the critical z value. The question asks for a 95% confidence interval. Either using our memory, or the z table given to us on the AP test, we can figure out that the *correct* critical z value is: 1.96.
United healthcare’s student health insurance was a HUGE stressor during grad school🙃
I had to float large sums of money waiting for reimbursement (which they messed up ~40% of the time at first), spend hours on the phone with them, and had a hard time finding a therapist😤
Healthcare is a right, and shouldn’t be tied to school/employment. It should be accessible, largely free, and it should focus on helping people NOT MAKING PROFITS.
This stuff pisses me off.
And while I’m on the subject, MAKE MENTAL HEALTHCARE MORE ACCESSIBLE.
Therapists deserve to make a living wage, AND clients who can’t afford it should have to spend $100s of dollars a month for therapy/meds.
First, PRIORS. In Bayesian Statistics, we use probability distributions (like a normal, Cauchy, beta...) to represent uncertainty about the value of parameters.
Instead of choosing ONE number for a param, a distribution describes how likely a range of values are
Bayesian Stats works by taking previously known, PRIOR information (this can be from prior data, domain expertise, regularization...) about the parameter
and combining it with data to make the POSTERIOR (the distribution of parameter values AFTER including data)
1. Does the model ACTUALLY answer a question you have?
If you don’t have a question THEN THE BEST INFERENTIAL/PREDICTIVE MODEL IS NO MODEL. Do some EDA first!
Stop doing hypothesis testing if you don’t have a hypothesis to test. ✋
2. Is the model realistic?
We love prior predictive checks bc they allow u to generate data based on ur priors😻 but also ask whether ur leaving out important effects, whether the variable u use actually measures what you want, or if linear relationships are realistic…
SINCE @kierisi has threatened to sarcastically/chaotically say incorrect things about p-values during #sliced tonight 😱 just to annoy people 😉,
I thought I’d do a quick thread on what a 🚨p-value🚨actually is.
🧵
(1/n)
Computationally, a p-value is p(data as extreme as ours | null). Imagine a 🌎 where the null hypothesis is true (e.g. there is no difference in cat fur shininess for cats eating food A vs. food B for 2 weeks), and see how extreme your observed data would be in that 🌎 (2/n)
So, you can think of the p-value as representing our data’s compatibility with the null hypothesis. Low p-values mean our data is not very likely in a world where the null is true. High p-values mean it is relatively likely. (3/n)