The Battle of Carchemish, the battle which secured the Neo-Babylonian Empire's hold on the Ancient Near East under Nebuchadnezzar II.
The Battle of Carchemish was fought in Carchemish on the Euphrates River about 605 BC between the armies of Egypt, led by Pharaoh Neco II, and Babylon, led by soon-to-be king Nebuchadnezzar.
Carchemish was on the west bank of the Euphrates in what is now southern Turkey, along the Syrian border. It was located at a strategic crossing of the Euphrates used for trade between Syria, Mesopotamia, and Anatolia.
The Hittites lost control of the city to the “Sea Peoples” during the Late Bronze Age Collapse.
When the Assyrians rose to power several centuries later, they were forced to pay tribute to Assyrian kings Shalmaneser III and Tiglath-pileser IV during the second half of the 800s BC before finally being taken by Sargon II in 717 BC.
Carchemish was excavated by David G. Hogarth and later by Sir Leonard Woolley between 1911 and 1920.
In the decade before the battle, the Assyrians had been driven out of their capital, Nineveh, in 612BC by an allied army of Medes, Scythians, Babylonians, along with other minor allies.
The Assyrians were forced out of their second capital, Haran, in 609BC and fled to Carchemish, which was under Egyptian rule under Pharaoh Neco II.
Pharaoh Neco had already tried to conquer Assyria’s western provinces while Babylon was conquering Assyria from the east.
Neco was ambitious. Herodotus records (4.42) that Neco sent out an expedition of Phoenicians that spent three years sailing from the Red Sea around Africa to the Strait of Gibraltar and back to Egypt.
Josephus (Antiquities 10.5.1) said that Neco’s support of Assyria stemmed from his desire to take advantage of the power vacuum left after the defeat of the Assyrian empire.
Neco allied with the remnants of Assyria its king Ashuruballit II but planned to assume control of the western half of the ANE upon his victory.
Neco was held up on his way to the battle by King Josiah of Judah. Neco defeated Josiah at the Battle of Megiddo, which is recorded in the Bible in 2 Kings 23:29-30 and 2 Chronicles 35:20-23.
The Chronicler (2 Chron. 35:21) records Neco claiming that God had commanded him to make haste to Carchemish and that God was with him.
The Babylonian Chronicle is our best source for the battle. It is also called the Nebuchadnezzar Chronicle or the Jerusalem Chronicle, because it also details the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians in 586BC.
The Babylonian Chronicle records that Babylonian king Nabopolassar while his eldest son, crown prince Nebuchadnezzar took command of the army marched toward Carchemish.
Nebuchadnezzar crossed the river and engaged the Egyptian army which “withdrew before him.”
The Babylonian Chronicle has a pithy and punchy account of the resolution of the battle:
“He accomplished their defeat and beat them to non-existence. As for the rest of the Egyptian army which had escaped from the defeat so quickly that no weapon had reached them…”
“…in the district of Hamath the Babylonian troops overtook and defeated them so that not a single man escaped to his own country.”
Nabopolassar died and Nebuchadnezzar assumed the throne. The next year he returned to the region and collected tribute, defeated Ashkelon, and secured his holdings almost to the border of Egypt.
Ashkelon repeatedly begged Egypt for help against Nebuchadnezzar, but Neco refused to respond. He just barely was able to repel a Babylonian attack against his eastern border in 601.
Neco died in 595BC never having recovered any of the land lost to Nebuchadnezzar.
Nebuchadnezzar went on to turn Babylon (the Neo-Babylonian Empire) into the largest and most powerful empire of the ANE.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A brief thread: The ancient Greeks did not call themselves "Greek." The word "greek" comes from the Latin "Graeci," the name given to them by the Romans.
The inhabitants of ancient Greece and other Greeks dwelling in the islands and on the coasts of the Mediterranean referred to themsevles as Hellenes (Ἕλληνες). Their country was Hellas (Ἑλλάς), and their language the Hellenic tongue (ἡ Ἑλληνικὴ γλῶττα).
Homer had no collective name for "all Greece." To Homer, the Hellenes are the inhabitants of Hellas, a district forming part of the kingdom of Peleus and situated in the S. E. of the country later called Thessaly.
Thread on Hittite Religion Pt. 3: The Role of the King
The Hittite king was not considered divine, however, but he was considered the favorite among the gods and they believed he was elected to power by the gods themselves.
The king was the head of the clergy who enacted the cult on behalf of the gods and was responsible for proper execution of cultic practices.
A Thread on Hittite Religion Pt. 2: The Hittites and Their Gods
Some terms to know: “ANE” = Ancient Near East;
“cultic” = religion characterized by prescribed rituals, usually centered around a place (eg a temple) or an object (eg an altar); most ANE religions were cultic. Ancient Israelite worship is the most well-known example of this.
First, let’s look at the contractual nature of the Hittite and their gods, which centered around cultic ritual.
Hittite religion has three main traits: a contractual nature of the relationship between the Hittites and their gods, importance of cultic rituals, and the role played by the king in their religion. These explain the intersection of the human and divine realms in Hittite thought.
But first, how do we know anything about the religious practices of an empire that died out 3200 years ago?
Thread on the Hittite Empire. For a good intro and overview, I recommend O. R. Guerny’s _The Hittites_ which can be found here: https://t.co/zaxym1lH7Sarchive.org/details/hittit…
The Hittites were an Indo-European people group who migrated into east-central Asia Minor (Anatolia) from the northeast during the Early Bronze Age ca 2000BC.
These invaders took over the land of the native peoples known as “Hattians.” It was the native Hattians who gave these invaders the name “Hittite.” They almost certainly did not call themselves that.
Thread on Roman names, specifically Caius Julius Caesar’s name
(some of this info is general knowledge and some is from Goldsworthy’s Caesar, which I highly recommend)
Roman names usually had three parts: praenomen, nomen, and cognomen, in that order. (A few, even among the aristocracy, only had two, a praenomen and nomen, such as Cnaeus Pompey and Mark Antony, but three was the usual pattern.) 2/
A man’s name showed his place in Roman society by revealing his family connections and heritage. 3/