Under Georgia law, special purpose grand juries aren’t authorized to indict. They can only issue a report recommending indictments.
While much of that report remains under seal, the SPGJ foreperson has indicated that it recommended multiple indictments. nytimes.com/2023/02/21/us/…
All of which is why Willis must present her case to yet another grand jury—a regular grand jury.
She must convince 12 out of at least 16 grand jurors that there is “probable cause” to believe that the accused committed the crime(s).
Probable cause is an extraordinarily low standard of proof.
It doesn’t even require a showing that criminal conduct “more likely than not” occurred.
In order to secure an indictment, prosecutors just need to show that there is a “fair probability” of criminal activity.
The usual rules of evidence—e.g. hearsay—don’t apply in grand jury proceedings.
And there’s all kinds of evidence the DA could use: documents, transcripts, audio or video recordings, the special grand jury report.
Some witnesses have been summonsed to appear in person.
The evidence will be tailored to showing probable cause for the elements of the alleged crimes.
As I put it yesterday: think of it as a highlight reel of the strongest evidence.
In the past, similarly complex cases have been heard in about 2 days. That’s what we expect here.
If and when an indictment is handed up by the grand jurors, the bailiff will walk the indictment down to the courtroom of the presiding judge.
Scheduled to preside this week is Judge Robert McBurney, who supervised the special grand jury’s probe into 2020 election interference.
McBurney, you might recall, is the judge whom Trump sought to disqualify from the case earlier this year.
But if Trump is criminally charged on in Georgia on Tuesday, it will be McBurney who receives the indictment from the bailiff in open court, as required by state law.
Presentment of the indictment is usually a no-frills affair.
The judge is not required to announce the names listed on the indictment.
We don’t know what McBurney will do here. But given public interest in the case, he might choose to announce the names or charges in court.
In Georgia, indictments aren’t filed under seal as they sometimes are in the federal system.
After the indictment is handed up to the judge, it will be brought to the clerk’s office to be stamped, filed, and made available to the public.
So, this won’t be like the NY case or classified docs case, both which involved a significant delay between return of the indictment & public access to the document.
Here, there could be a slight delay as the clerks copy the indictment, but i expect it will be just that—slight.
In the coming days, I’ll be at the courthouse to report as it all goes down.
We @lawfare will bring you detailed coverage and analysis as events unfold.
I hope you’ll follow along!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New: As Judge Aileen Cannon made her debut at a hearing in the classified documents case, she appeared disinclined to grant the Special Counsel’s request for a December trial date…but also seemed skeptical of Trump & Nauta’s bid to delay the trial until after the 2024 election.
During a nearly 2 hour hearing, Cannon peppered both defense counsel and prosecutors with questions about the anticipated discovery & motion practice timeline.
But she put off setting a trial date from the bench, indicating instead that she will enter a written order “soon.”
Cannon expressed skepticism toward DOJ’s claim that Trump & Nauta’s case could realistically proceed to trial by Dec. 11 because it is not unusually “complex.” She repeatedly noted that she is unaware of any case involving classified info that proceeded to trial within 6 months.