Amit Schandillia Profile picture
Aug 14, 2023 13 tweets 5 min read Read on X
A PAKISTAN THAT DIDN’T HAPPEN
That Bose met Hitler and sought his help is common knowledge. What isn’t as much, is that 4 years before him a Punjabi Muslim did the same to curry support for his vision of an independent Muslim homeland. This was the year of Kristallnacht. Image
Chaudhry Rehmat Ali wanted to be known as and openly called himself the “founder of the Pakistan National Movement.” In 1933, he published “Now or Never,” a leaflet announcing his call for a separate Muslim nation. This was 2 years before Lahore Resolution. Image
“Now or Never” is where the name Pakistan was first coined and the entity it envisioned included all of Kashmir and all of Punjab.

In 1947, he published another leaflet titled “The Greatest Betrayal: How to Redeem the Millat?”
In this leaflet, he laid out a slightly modified map of his version of the Indian subcontinent where he renamed the subcontinent to Dinia (a corruption of India) and imagined a number of sovereign Muslim entities besides Pakistan that included even Sri Lanka and Bhutan! Image
In this scheme, Pakistan included all of Kashmir, Punjab, Haryana, and HP leaving only a tiny enclave within Pakistan as sovereign Sikh territory. Kerala was to be Maplistan and almost the entire NE, Bangistan.

Even the seas were given Muslim names. Image
Even before he met Hitler, his ideas had reached Germany, and the December 12, 1937 edition of Völkischer Beobachter, a Nazi mouthpiece, carried a whole article on the Pakistan National Movement, Ali’s brainchild.

That, however, is where his relationship with Germany stops.
There’s no evidence of Hitler doing anything to support Ali’s position besides this newspaper article.

Ali’s ideals of Pakistan, thankfully, never came to fruition and the country went independent without Kashmir, HP, or Haryana, and India didn’t become Dinia.
This, however, didn’t go down well with Ali who had envisioned a much larger Pakistan. Consequently, while fellow countrymen celebrated independence, Ali spent his days bitterly resenting Jinnah for settling for a smaller nation.
Pakistan’s Qaid-e-Azam became Ali’s Quisling-e-Azam. Interestingly, Ali also called Pakistan his “Fatherland,” in line with Hitler’s appellation for Germany. The derogation of Jinnah doesn’t seem to have gone down too well with the government as he was exiled the very next year.
Image
Image
Ali would spend the rest of his life in England, finally dying in Cambridge 4 years later. Upon exile, all his communications with relatives back home were subjected to severe censorship and only one letter to his brother seems to have survived to this day.
Image
Image
Ironically, the man who coined Pakistan’s very name, died dreaming of a Pakistani passport. He applied, but never received a response. His possessions in Pakistan were all confiscated and life in England was basically a start from the absolute scratch.
Image
Image
A contemporary named Mian Abdul Haq noted the strong influence of Hitler’s ideology on Ali’s own. Apparently, the latter had memorized several Nazi writings by heart. Which sits well with his meeting with Hitler back in 1938.
Image
Image
Ultimately the man who dreamed of an Islamic subcontinent with barely anything for non-Muslims, sought Hitler’s help realizing it, and resented his own men for settling for too little died in penury, without even an address.

Uncelebrated.

Unattended.

Happy Birthday, Pakistan.

Image
Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Amit Schandillia

Amit Schandillia Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Schandillia

Dec 31, 2025
[SHARIABOLSHEVISM]
1/20
About 50 years ago, campus commies and career Marxists helped Khomeini turn Iran into a Shariʿa hellscape.

But this was neither an anomaly, nor the first. Islam and communism have always been ideological bedmates, but first let’s talk Sudan.
2/20
Sudan under Ibrahim Abbud had a secular constitution. Abbud had a tight leash on all Islamic outfits in his realm and crushed any attempt to legitimize them with a dictatorial hand. It was no fairytale, but it was secular.

Then came a student uprising.
3/20
In 1964, the regime banned a student seminar at the Uni. of Khartoum for being antinational. Protests followed, then came police action, a dead student, and finally, the Sudanese Communist Party.

On its rolls? Students, professors, teachers, lawyers, the usual suspects.
Read 20 tweets
Nov 16, 2025
Dear Anuja. With no malice and no sense of superiority, I would like to counter you in behalf of the author. My only intent is to enlighten both you and our readers because ignorance serves none.

From the confidence of your critique, I am assuming you have read the Baburnama firsthand. I have. Not in Persian like Aabhas, but in English, a language us non-scholars are familiar with.

We will take this up one critique at a time. I will be quoting you verbatim, and then offering the rebuttal for that specific claim, and so on. Hope you take it in the right spirit.
“Babur is harshly criticised for being too much of a religious fanatic committed to rooting out the kafirs and infidels.”

This is what Babur says in his journal (Baburnama):

For Islam’s sake, I wandered in the wilds,
Prepared for war with pagans and Hindus,
Resolved myself to meet the martyr’s death.
Thanks be to God! A ghazi became.

Do you sense any ambiguity here? No, right? So Babur’s intent seems mighty indisputable. What’s your critique then? That Aabhas tells us about this? Don’t you think Babur would have wanted this told?Image
Image
“Yet, in nearly every other page amidst the tediously trotted-out information dump, the reader is told that Babur, in direct violation of Islamic principles, indulged in inebriants and intoxicants at interminable wine and arak parties, and was a drunken sot who also exhibited homosexual tendencies.”

Before we even touch upon his drinking and sexuality, I want to understand the critique here, admitting both allegations, of alcohol and homosexuality. How is it the author’s fault?

If Babur wanted to spread Islam by the sword while also violating two most fundamentals of the faith, doesn’t it make him the hypocrite? What are you expecting the author to do here? Gloss over it?

First of all, Babur was a Central Asian Turkic. In that part of the world at least in those days, wine and jihad going hand-in-hand was no anomaly. Even today, Central Asia is the most alcohol-friendly part of the Muslim world. Having said that, Babur did give up wine. This is what he writes:

And I made public the resolution to abstain from wine, which had been hidden in the treasury of my breast. The victorious servants, in accordance with the illustrious order, dashed upon the earth of contempt and destruction the flagons and the cups, and the other utensils in gold and silver, which in their number and their brilliance were like the stars of the firmament.

And guess what, this happened BEFORE he crowned himself “ghazi” to fight the “pagans and Hindus.”

Now coming to his homosexuality, this is what he wrote for a slave boy in Ferghana:

May none be as I, humbled and wretched and lovesick;
No beloved as thou art to me, cruel and careless.

Would you not call this romantic? Is there a more “platonic” interpretation that we’re unable to see through our saffron-tinted lens? Is it evil, bigoted, or Islamophobic to repeat what Babur has in no ambiguous terms stated himself? Please be intellectually honest here. Am sure you’re capable of that.

To reiterate, both these episodes—his renunciation of alcohol and his homosexuality—predate the inauguration of his anti-Hindu crusade.Image
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Aug 18, 2025
The whole idea that Savarkar called himself “veer” goes back to a single source—The Life of Barrister Savarkar, an autobiographical work by the man himself under the pseudonym Chitragupta.

So Savarkar basically wrote a whole book under a fake name just to make himself look cool. Pretty vain, if you ask me. But there’s a catch...

The word “veer” does not appear even once in the entire original edition! Yes, Savarkar wrote under a pseudonym but he did NOT award himself any fancy title, much less “veer.” Then where did the canard even originate?

A later edition from 1986.

A good 20 years after Savarkar’s death.

And the only place it appears is in the preface. Who wrote the preface? A man named Dr. Ravindra Vaman Ramdas.

Also, in case you missed it, this is also the fist time “Barrister Savarkar” of the original title becomes “Swatantra Veer Savarkar.”

In sum, someone called Savarkar “veer” in a preface to a much later edition of the original. We’ll come to the absurd leap from THIS to Savarkar calling himself veer, but first let’s find out why Dr. Ramdas did it in the first place.Image
Image
Image
Turns out, the title was first accorded to him as early as 1917 in a Ghadar Party publication calling for his release from Cellular. Of course, I can’t read Urdu, nor is this my own finding. These are the two sources should you feel like a deeper dive:

x.com/sameer_kasture…
x.com/keshavadevarao…

And now we come to the absurd leap.Image
Image
This absurd leap happened in 2017 when a man named Ziya Us Salam (of course) made the claim in
a 2018 book titled Of Saffron Flags and Skullcaps: Hindutva, Muslim Identity and the Idea of India. where he writes,

“Incidentally, he is said to have added the prefix ‘Veer’ to his name himself through a biography he himself authored.”

Interestingly, Salam leaves a clever wiggle room for himself with “said to have added” instead of a more assertive “added.” Why would be be so unsure? Perhaps because he knew he was lying? Do note that he himself notes the title of the autobiography as the original “Life of Barrister Savarkar” and not “Life of Swatantra Veer Savarkar” where the epithet actually appears.

Our next exhibit doesn’t bother even with that ambiguity.Image
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 22, 2024
THREAD: 8200

1/50
In January 2010, officials of the International Atomic Energy Agency or IAEA noticed strange goings-on at the uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, about 200 miles south of Tehran. The centrifuges at the facility were being decommissioned at an unusual rate.
2/50
Centrifuges are fragile and tend to break down, with an estimated 10% annual failure rate. In November 2009, there were 8,700 at this facility, so around 800 were expected to fail by the end of 2010. But this was still January, and the inspectors had already counted 2,000.
3/50
Before we go on, it’s important to understand some elementary concepts here. There are two uranium isotopes, U235 and U238. While both are radioactive, U235 is far preferred than its heavier sibling in nuclear applications, both civilian and military.
Read 97 tweets
Sep 18, 2024
[THE FORGOTTEN MASTERSTROKE]
1/25
Wires, electronics, explosives, and other wares were smuggled into Iran over the course of a year. Covertly. One small piece at a time. All meant for in situ assembly. When finally put together, the contraption weighed nearly a ton. At its heart was a Belgian-made FN MAG machine gun.Image
2/25
As should be an easy guess, this was in preparation for an assassination. The year was 2020. Target? A high-profile IRGC asset, big enough to enjoy the highest levels of State protection. You likely guessed Qasem Soleimani, the commander of the Quds Force, but you’re wrong.
3/25
This was someone else, just as important to the Islamic regime, if not more, but remarkably under popular radar. Soleimani was taken in January, on foreign soil. This one would meet his fate in November.

And barely 60 miles from Tehran.
Read 25 tweets
Aug 7, 2024
This is Sajit Chandra Debnath, a 42-year-old Bangladeshi with two business degrees and a doctorate from Japan’s Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University. Born in an influential Hindu family not far from Dhaka, Sajit coauthored over two dozen papers on business studies and taught at his Japanese alma mater for over five years. Even took a Japanese wife.Image
This is him now. I mean as of 2014. Or 2008, who knows. What happened?

Sometime before 2008, Sajit converted to Islam. Sometime before 2008 because we don’t know for sure. 2008 is when he was first noticed sporting a beard by his family. Which he tried hiding behind a surgical mask then.Image
In this avatar, he’d gone from Sajit Chandra Debnath to Mohammad Saifullah Ozaki, the name he’s still known by.

In 2014, he joined the ISIS-affiliated Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh or JMB and came in contact with one Gazi Sohan at a Dhaka mosque.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(