Analysing the Role of Inverted Fullbacks in the EPL this Weekend: [Thread]
Manchester United:
- Shaw - ineffective when inverted: 4/10
- Wan Bissaka - offered verticality from underlaps and created chances (plus the goal): 8/10
Spurs:
- Udogie - inversion left Son isolated at times: 5/10
- Emerson Royal - scored, and gave rise to Skipp and Kulusevski's balance on the right wing: 6/10
Chelsea:
- Chilwell - Attacked depth with threatening runs: 9/10*
- James - progressed through combinations and created chances through vertical runs: 9/10*
*note: wingbacks, so not a level comparison to effectiveness of regular FBs as system is significantly different.
Manchester City:
- Lewis - regular inversion and Bernardo's rotations kept build-up fluid: 6/10
- Walker - accentuated City's more vertical approach with genuine overlaps and bursts from deep, and created a goal: 8/10
Summary graphic:
Please note these numbers aren't a strict comparison (as it is rather pointless to directly compare across tactical systems and opposition) - the ratings are merely to provide a number representing my subjective findings in a simple manner.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Erik Ten Hag is revolutionising the way Manchester United play football. This isn’t without difficulty however – Ten Hag’s approach is risky and requires substantial change. This thread explores the topic of personnel and risk vs reward when considering ETH's principles. [Thread]
There are three key facets to consider in this discussion:
- The risky nature of Ten Hag’s principles
- The quality and implementation of coaching
- The players: in terms of individual profiles and team make-up
Further, some parameters to consider when evaluating the relative success/failure of Ten Hag’s approach:
- Time it takes to implement principles
- Limiting factors (player quality & profiles, execution of principles, luck)
- What is to be considered a success
📌 How Erik ten Hag's Manchester United struggled against West Ham's mid-block - and what this means for the players and Ten Hag's principles of play [thread].
Manchester United and West Ham lined up as such:
West Ham sat in a 442 mid-block and looked to attack United in transitions - building attacks through hold up play and direct dribbling, before subsequent set-pieces.
United were matched player for player in build-up and progression, and struggled for inspiration.
📌 Using Data to Identify Areas Where Erik ten Hag Can Improve Manchester United [thread]:
Before looking at areas at United that Erik ten Hag can improve at United, it could be worth reviewing the principles of play Ten Hag has implemented as a coach at Ajax recently:
This is 100% true. Players who doubt, don’t have confidence or clarity. They’re susceptible to possession loss, they slow down play, they’re less likely to execute actions well.
For me, there are three main aspects to achieving clarity:
1) understanding of system and principles
2) understanding of what you’re going to do
3) coaching/instructions from teammates
Ultimately, a system or coaching in that vein (#1) alleviates the prerogative of a player to make a decision in each given circumstance (#2).
To achieve absolute clarity and confidence in your actions, in any given state of the game (with time on the ball or under pressure, when you have multiple options or when you have no options), you need that overarching set of principles.
📌 The Titanic Battle Between Pep Guardiola and Diego Simeone [mini-thread]:
Atleti began in a 532 block, with City implementing their usual build-up strategies. Advantage City; over 90 minutes they would most likely have broken this block down; the progression angles are favourable and they had ultimate control in build-up.
City were able to build in their regular manner. They had an advantage over the front two, and could access most of the players in the progression chain easily, accessing their wingers.
📌 Erik ten Hag to Manchester United [thread]:
- ten Hag's Principles of Play at Ajax
- Strengths and Complexities of the System
- Suitability for the Premier League and United's Squad
Erik ten Hag has been strongly linked with the Manchester United managerial position, commencing this summer, so this thread will aim to analyse Ten Hag’s principles of play to date, and how these will fare in line with United’s squad and expectations.
Erik ten Hag has typically lined his Ajax side up with a 433 nominal formation. This is quite straightforward; there’s nothing too notable to discuss yet, but that’s fine. Both Klopp and Pep use a nominal 433 too – it’s the most conventional 4atb nominal set-up in possession.