How Ange Postecoglou should lineup vs. Manchester United, the one crucial factor which will decide the entire match, and the weaknesses that can be exploited.
Pre-Match Analysis.
THREAD
You know, it’s always fun to look back on my predictions, especially now I have them physically written. It’s like a diary. And I can say my Brentford one was spot on, not sounding arrogant, but it makes me feel better about myself and my tactical understanding of the game. I predicted a draw or loss, the match was drawn. I said Brentford will play a back 5, even though they lined up with a back 4 for the entirety of the preseason, they played a back 5. I said they will exploit the lack of width in-possession, they exploited the lack of possession, and is how they got that very good chance Mbeumo missed towards the end of the 2nd half.
So now, I will attempt to break down the Manchester United game. And as a note, this not how I think Postecoglou will line, albeit I will touch on that, but rather how he should to maximise his odds of a result.
In my opinion, Manchester United have the best midfield in the league. They play primarily counter attacking football, and their midfield is setup perfectly for such. Casemiro, one of the best ball winners in the Premier League, Mason Mount one of the best pressers in the Premier League, and Bruno Fernandes, one of the best creators in the Premier League. Ultimately, these 3 cogs are the cogs you need for counter attacking football to be pure flowing.
There is a common misconception with a player like Mason Mount, a player that is largely misprofiled. He should not be recognised for his attacking contribution (which is just a bonus), but rather his defensive contribution. He excels as an 8, or in a double pivot, something which he can perform with Casemiro.
The dynamic is very simple, Mount’s immense pressing abilities will look to suffocate Tottenham in possession, and attempt to force an error, with Casemiro looking to win the ball, releasing it to Bruno Fernandes who will then likely play through to Rashford who has blistering place and can exploit Tottenham’s players being out of possession.
Obviously, this is a very simplified version of what will happen, but the dynamic is not very different. That is how Manchester United will primarily look to score goals. This is the crux of how United will look to generate their attacks, and obviously, this is what Postecoglou needs to focus on countering, so how will he achieve that?
Well, the idea is actually very, very simple. Keep possession. Postecoglou does not need to change his tactics significantly in such a game, but rather instruct his squad to be a lot safer, and less direct. I am a huge fan of Lo Celso, but he is a player who is simply more “attacking”, and is a player that should look to open tight defenses, whilst also providing defensive contribution.
Although Manchester United also enjoy playing off the counter, their defense isn’t played too tightly, rather the crux of their counter attacking prowess comes frmo winning the midfield duels.
As a result, you need to focus on maximizing ball retention. You need players who will be press resistant, and for that reason, I Ange should choose the midfield pairing of Sarr-Bissouma. I would argue they are easily your best midfielders in terms of retaining possession.
When it comes to inverting, as Ange likes, versus this Manchester United setup it becomes a difficult dilemma. Emerson in midfield essentially offers an extra man, providing an extra pathway for a pass when pressed, easing the pressure.
However, as I mentioned in my pre match Brentford thread, the inverting leads to a big defensive vulnerability in the wide areas. And for a team like Manchester United that plays off the counter, if the ball is won in the middle, it is very likely a goal.
So the question is, do you take this risk? And I would say yes.
But I have to emphasize, there is a lot of pressure on your midfield keeping possession in these congested areas. And ultimately, that is really what I think this whole result will come down to. How well you can keep possession. Because for a team like Manchester United and how they set up tactically, if you lose possession in such an area, they will catch your full back out of possession and target the left flank.
The key player to watch is Bruno Fernandes. He will play with complete freedom, and thus, be a big pain to mark. Out of possession, it is very likely Bruno will drop deep, he will look to be in an area where he can receive the ball if possession is won. But on top of this, Bruno will also look to aid Casemiro and Mount by pressing himself.
However, in possession and when United are not looking to play off the counter, Bruno can drift anywhere. He’ll drift towards the right flank, he’ll make runs into the box, he’ll stay deep, you don’t know where he’s going to go. And basically every attack generated by Manchester United that isn’t off the counter all starts with Bruno as the centrepiece.
That’s why, you need Bissouma to man mark him. If he drifts to the right, Bissouma has to follow him. Left, Bissouma has to follow. Runs into the box, Bissouma has to follow him. But doesn’t that leave the midfield exploited? Yes. That’s why when Bissouma is dragged out of possession, Sarr has to drop deeper, Maddison has to track back and help out defensively, whilst Kulusevski also has to drift centrally in aim to cover the potentially lost man.
And another thing that makes this whole thing a headache is the fact I think Martial will start, so it is very likely that throughout the game we can see Bruno-Martial alternating throughout, so again, good marking from Bissouma and co will be absolutely key to not let United generate any attacks off the counter.
The final way United are able to generate threat is through Luke Shaw’s phenomenal delivery. Admittedly, United are not strong aerially, but this is still something that you should watch out for.
Now, as for Tottenham, how should they set up?
I have already touched on Emerson, and why he should be the starting right back, and the centre-back pairing speaks for itself, however, let me talk about the Left Back situation.
Will Ange start Ben Davies on Saturday? Probably not. Should he? Yes. I thought Udogie had a great game vs. Brentford on the weekend, and he should be starting nearly every game. But I have touched on this several times, retaining possession is key. Davies is simply better at that.
He will match up vs Antony and Wan Bissaka, both of who have absolutely 0 attacking threat. Whoever starts in that left back spot won’t struggle defensively. However, we know Udogie is more creative going forward, which could pose a threat, especially vs. someone like Wan Bissaka. Hence, my preference for Davies, as he is just less naturally direct, which is something that would suit such a game.
Midfield, I have already touched on, Bissouma-Sarr-Maddison.
Now, let’s talk about the attack. What I want is Perisic-Son-Kulusevski, but what we’ll get is Son-Richarlison-Kulusevski. And frankly, this cannot keep happening. The way Postecoglou is instructing Son to play does not play to his strengths, and Richarlison simply is not good. I’m not going to sugarcoat it, and I know you love my optimism, but I think under no circumstance, Richarlison should start. Even if he scores today, it won’t change my mind. He’s an average player, and impact sub at best.
But the reality is, this is a dilemma for Postecoglou. You cannot bench a player of Richarlison’s interclub stature. If you lose a strong dressing room presence into the season by benching him after 1 game, then it will set a terrible atmosphere already. He was bought for 50 Million, he joined expecting to be the starting striker after Harry Kane left. Harry Kane left, and you bench him after 1 game? That is a recipe for disaster.
I don't’ blame Ange for starting him, and obviously when Richarlison drops bad performance after bad performance, he will have a justification to drop him, so the impact on the dressing room will not be as significant. But what’s best for all parties is just to sell him, and buy a replacement.
So, let’s talk about how I would lineup and why.
Son should start as the 9. I have spoken about this before, but a lot of wingers go through the transformation to a 9 arc. I think this is Son’s time. There is no reason I would start him here in particular tactically, but rather his competition is terrible. That doesn’t change how I feel about Son in a 9 role, he would absolutely excel and put up the best numbers in his career. He would play a similar role to Furuhashi did at Celtic, just upgraded in every attribute. Lightning pace, the best finishing in the world, and good with both feet.
Perisic on the wing would match up well vs. Wan Bissaka. Wan Bissaka is the best 1v1 defender in the world, no one else comes close, but Perisic is incredibly versatile. If needed he can attempt a take on, but the thing that is most crucial about Perisic is his pinpoint delivery on his crosses. He doesn’t have to rely on beating his man to be a threat down that left hand side.
And this is what I’d like to touch on a bit more, Manchester United are as bad as Tottenham aerially. Their attack is not aerially good, their defense is aerially mediocre, and don’t even get me started on their midfield. And whilst, yes, Tottenham are also very poor aerially, Manchester United’s lack of aerial dominance is still something you should attempt to take advantage of if need be. Perisic helps with this.
And that’s why I think holding onto the ball is just a crucial aspect in this game, no need to be impatient. Either you keep possession, or you play for the foul in an area where you can float a dangerous Maddison free kick or Perisic corner into the box. Perisic and Maddison have some of the best set piece delivery in the world, so utilising this by playing for corners and free kicks versus an aerially weak Manchester United side will be a surefire way to maximise your odds of winning.
And finally, Kulusevski, admittedly, will have a hard time matching up vs. Shaw going forward. However, just like Perisic, he also has the ability to fire that lethal cross into the box. But despite how I feel about him offensively in such a matchup, I think his ability to retain possession is something that will absolutely be crucial in this game. He doesn’t need to attempt to beat his man like he already does, rather just look to progress the ball, make simple passes, and work the balls into dangerous areas, simultaneously whilst resisting the press.
So what is my prediction? I think it simply comes down to how well Tottenham are able to retain possession, and the midfield battle. Out of sheer individual quality, I will expect Tottenham to pull through, especially being at home, but a draw wouldn’t be a surprising result. This game is a game Postecoglou cannot win on his own without significantly changing his tactics, formations, and personnel, but rather a game that will need his players to keep calm under pressure in possession. Even if the players follow Postecoglou’s tactics word for word, it will still depend on how well they are able to resist the press of the Manchester United midfield.
Bayern Munich today face their biggest task yet. Their most difficult task yet.
Simone Inzaghi's Inter Milan.
A chance to get one step closer to The Champions League Final in Munchen. At home.
Here is a tactical insight into how they should lineup, and predictions.
THREAD
Simone Inzaghi is one of the best coaches in Europe. His combination of compact football, and emphasis on defensive structure, without being afraid to control tempo, and also push forward to attack is hard.
Especially in a European setting, this style and shape matches up incredibly well against "modern" teams.
However, his system fundamentally relies on the quality of the fullbacks to be able to stretch oppositions in attack.
The issue for Inzaghi? Both Denzel Dumfries and now, after writing this, Federico Dimarco are out.
Huge.
Inzaghi's system revolves around the wingbacks being able to stretch the pitch. Otherwise very fluid, with a lot of positional rotation amongst the central players, it at times can become very rigid and claustraphobic.
That is why the wingbacks are so, so crucial. Because even though these rotations can disrupt opposition central structure, that's not possible without the use of quality, dynamic wingbacks to stretch the pitch and discourage opponents from playing narrow and counteracting this.
In 2025, 3 talents that have the potential to be the sport's biggest superstars for the next decade will be joining Chelsea.
Estevao Willian, Kendry Paez, and Aaron Anselmino.
— An analysis on each player. Strengths, weaknesses.
— Their best role in Maresca's system. Maximising said strengths, minimising weaknesses.
— Future development plans.
THREAD
2025 will be a terrifying year for the league.
Guardiola's potentially last season, Phase 3 Postecoglou, and the most terrifying of them all?
Maresca's Chelsea with 3 generational talents in the midst.
Can you imagine if Chelsea do go all the way this season, and compete for the title until the very end - how TERRIFYING Phase 2 Maresca would be?
Making an already strong squad with versatile profiles even stronger.
And the most important thing is none of these players are "luxury", they are either signings in the areas Chelsea desperately need, or at the very least unique profiles that Chelsea appreciate.
That is what makes them especially terrifying. This is not like Real Madrid signing Mbappe.
This is like if Manchester City had signed Mohamed Salah after winning the treble.
— Estevao provides Chelsea an immense player in their weakest 2 attacking areas (RW/Right 8).
— Paez provides the same.
— Anselmino also addresses Chelsea's weakest area, centre back depth.
It is the biggest game of the Maresca era. One that could cement Chelsea as title challengers.
It is also the biggest game of the Arteta era. One that could put his job at risk, if lost.
How will this game play out? How can MAresca win? tactical analysis and deep dive.
THREAD
The quality of football that Arsenal play has significanty diminished over the past year. They are not that free flowing, high pressing, high pressure sustaining team they were a year ago.
Around February, things went downhill. And recent results are a sign of that.
Arteta's system has shifted to a hybrid of a mid/lowblock, and he has began putting excess emphasis on duels/duel proficiency. He has garnered an obsession with strong defensive prowess.
And this is great in practice, but not so much on paper.
Whilst Bukayo Saka is a brilliant talent, and has shown unreal consistency throughout the past few years - he simply does not compare to Cole Palmer (nor does any other active English talent).
Here are 5 areas Palmer excels at in comparison to Saka.
MINITHREAD.
1. Movement.
Cole Palmer has the movement and instinct of a world class 9. Dare I say, after Erling Haaland - he has the 2nd best movement/positioning in the entire world.
Bukayo Saka is rather static, he doesn't find himself in these goal scoring positions as often. Feel like Bukayo Saka's game stems from muscle memory more than initiative - and when a player lacks this element of positional sense/movement, I think it is quite indicative.
Cole Palmer has this fearlessness, takes up responsibility of being the team's primary creator and goal scorer. Movement either finds space for himself, or creates space for others. Large reason why Jackson has been so productive is that movement combination with Cole Palmer.
2. Creativity.
Bukayo Saka is one of the most creators players in the world, I agree. But Cole Palmer is the best.
Like I said - a lot of Saka's game feels more like muscle memory than iniative. It is like he is precoded. And that is why he is so good at what he does, but as a a result, he suffers in comparison to someone like Cole Palmer who is much more inventive than Saka.
Saka's creativity usually comes from elite crossing/cutbacks - Palmer is much more varied. Lobs into the box, through balls/line breakers, crosses, clever 1-2s. Expansive. Harder to contain - you can't force him onto his weak foot to generate a weaker cross, because he will just find another way to create.
Olise-Kane-Musiala is the deadliest attacking triangle in Europe currently.
Here is how Kompany has transformed them and Bayern Munich back into the lethal attacking unit they once were, and why they can become one of the best trios we have ever seen.
THREAD
When I spoke about Vincent Kompany when he was first appointed, and about the tactical ideas he could bring - I put a big emphasis on his desire for fluidity.
He is someone who likes versatile personnel to execute his game plans, in all phases of the game - it gives him the freedom to tweak his tactical ideas.
The big emphasis from fluidity stems primarily from the fullbacks, who Kompany likes to be able to play in different areas of the pitch - whether it be as a traditional, overlapping fullback, one that likes to come inside, or more rarely one that forms a Back 3.
But how does this relate to the attack? What do fullbacks have to do with Olise-Kane-Musiala?
Analysing every Cole Palmer action vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers.
- Every touch.
- Every decision.
- Out of possession movements.
- Why he excels in a central role under Maresca.
- Why he isn't a one season wonder.
MEGATHREAD
Cole Palmer had a quite anonymous game against Manchester City. His haters, his doubters were immediately resorting to calling him a 1 season wonder.
And their claims did not last long, with him getting 4 goal contributions the very next. This is anything but a one season wonder.
If you are still a Cole Palmer doubter, this will be a very long season for you, and I am sorry in advance.
Immediately after kick off, Cole Palmer is involved. The ball is played long to Madueke, and Palmer immediately anticipates Madueke's header back, and attacks the half space around Lemina.
This is quite basic, and it's not what I want to highlight (since it was unrealistic Palmer would have actually gotten that ball).
What I want you to pay attention is his starting position by the halfway line. And then look at his position he assumes in the final screenshot. He is all the way by the Final 3rd, not even 7 seconds after his initial position.
This highlights Palmer's relentless press, but also the freedom he's been given by an otherwise controlling manager in Maresca.
He's aware that Palmer can be effective anywhere on the pitch (hence why we saw him frequently on the left hand side as well against Manchester City), so instead of having Palmer drop back and Madueke press, he had license to press himself.
This allowed Chelsea to keep some more attacking intensity, with Caicedo and Gusto both able to take higher up positions on the pitch.
This press actually ends up forcing a throw-in by Wolves, with Chelsea having time to regroup.